NEW YORK - Workers' advocates say Gov. Andrew Cuomo had plenty of time to request changes to a bill to help victims of wage theft, but chose to veto the measure instead.

Senate Bill S-2488-B, also known as the Securing Wages Against Theft or "SWEAT" bill, has been introduced in the state Legislature several times in the past five years - but didn't pass both houses until last June.

Cuomo said he had problems with some of the legal provisions in the bill. But Mark Dunlea - chair of the Green Education and Legal Fund - helped introduce it, and says lawmakers have been open to making changes.

"The Assembly Judiciary Committee did take steps to deal with some of the legal issues and the bill was changed," says Dunlea. "And so, to literally wait until the day after New Year's Eve to veto the bill is just outrageous, and shameful."

In vetoing the bill, Cuomo said the state has collected $310 million in stolen wages since 2011, but its supporters say New York workers lose $1 billion a year to wage theft.

Some employers accused of wage theft avoid judgements by transferring their assets to family members and declaring bankruptcy. Dunlea points out that the SWEAT bill would freeze those assets while ensuring that the people accused are treated fairly.

"This would only deal with situations where a lien had already been approved by some type of judicial process," says Dunlea.

He adds that when assets aren't frozen, wage-theft victims who prove their cases often are unable to collect the money they are owed.

Dunlea, who served 30 years as executive director of the Hunger Action Network of New York State, notes that passing the SWEAT bill was an important step to fight wage theft and get justice for some of the state's most vulnerable workers.

"If they're getting a billion dollars stolen out of their paychecks," says Dunlea. "Putting that billion dollars back into their pocket would really help reduce hunger and homelessness in New York state."

The governor says he'll introduce his own version of the SWEAT bill in this year's budget.




get more stories like this via email

Massachusetts unions and worker-owned cooperatives are joining forces to help tackle the state's historic wealth gap.

Census data show just a handful of households now have average incomes nearly 14 times larger than the bottom 20%.

Kevin O'Brien is a worker-owner with the unionized Worx Printing Cooperative in Worcester. He said workers increasingly want a say in workplace conditions, greater job security, and a piece of the profits.

"The more they know and understand about cooperative ownership," said O'Brien, "I think the sky is kind of the limit on what they'll be able to do, to combat this wealth gap."

O'Brien said there's great potential for more worker-owned co-ops, due to the impending "silver tsunami" of retiring small business owners - who will need to sell or transfer their assets.

He said the co-op model is already in place for businesses to replicate, while unions can help provide the resources co-ops need - including access to capital.

The number of worker-owned cooperatives in Massachusetts has tripled over the past decade.

About 40% of these co-ops have a majority of worker-owners of color, who may lack other means to build generational wealth.

Soren Rose is a worker-owner at Circus Cooperative Café in Cambridge.

He said he's proud to be part of a wider movement toward worker empowerment and café unionization, including the recently formed Blue Bottle Independent Union.

"We have so much in common with the struggles of our union comrades," said Rose, "and we like to share resources, and make sure that we're all joining in a broader fight for good working and living conditions, in the Boston area and Northeast as well."

Rose said some café customers come for the coffee - others to support the co-op model, too.

State lawmakers have created a new state agency to develop that model further and a nearly $8-million technical assistance fund of small grants to help.




get more stories like this via email

When the calendar flips to January, a number of states will increase their minimum wage levels - but just like recent years, North Dakota won't be among them. Those pushing for changes plan to try again.

North Dakota's minimum wage hasn't gone up in 15 years, standing firm at $7.25 an hour - also the federal level.

Meanwhile, many other states in this part of the country have gradually boosted theirs above $10.

State Rep. LaurieBeth Hager - D-Fargo - said she made this a big priority while serving in North Dakota's Legislature.

She echoed what some in the research community have noted, about giving low-income populations the power to lift themselves out of poverty.

"If people are making more, and have more buying potential, more earning potential," said Hager, "their whole life and their whole dreams can be entirely different."

And while researchers say these moves might not lead to big job losses, there are lingering concerns about employers turning to automation.

Hager said she doesn't have a firm number for a forthcoming bill this session, but she said she plans to keep it around $9 to make it easier for small businesses to absorb.

Republicans still control both chambers, and Hager said she plans to seek approval in placing the issue before voters - as opposed to a simple Legislative vote like last session.

Citizen-led ballot questions also are options and have worked in other conservative-led states - but Hager said that can be a thorny issue in North Dakota, even if voters say yes.

Meanwhile, Landis Larson - president of the North Dakota AFL-CIO - said skeptics might argue about costs being passed along to consumers or other drawbacks.

But he added that not making adjustments for low-wage earners can be felt in other ways.

"You know, if you look at it another way," said Larson, "most of those people are on some kind of government programs that actually everyone pays for in the long run."

A 2021 report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that millions of American adults earning low wages rely on federal programs, like Medicaid, to meet basic needs.

Nationwide, more than 20 states and nearly 40 cities will increase their minimum wage rates when the new year begins.




get more stories like this via email

Many households across Arkansas are just above the federal poverty line, but earn less than they need to cover their basic needs.

These people, like Aida Borrero of Little Rock, are known to be a part of an ALICE household.

ALICE stands for asset limited, income constrained, employed - and describes the unique socio-economic status of workers and households.

Earlier this year, Borrero got treatment for colon cancer. She said because of that, and the rising cost of goods, her family has struggled to get by.

Borrero said they were living off her husband's salary while she recuperated. That was before he was diagnosed with the same cancer.

"My husband is limited to the work he can do," said Borrero. "He's currently working two days out of the week due to his various medical conditions, and I'm not currently working because of my own health conditions. What I get from Social Security isn't a lot. I can help, but it really isn't sufficient."

Between 2021 and 2022, the 'ALICE household survival budget' for a single adult in Arkansas increased from almost $24,000 to approximately $25,000 a year.

That is well above the federal poverty line of about $13,500 a year. Advocates want change.

In 2023, Hawaii Gov. Josh Green signed legislation to extend family tax credits to offer more assistance to ALICE families.

Borrero, who is Latina, said other communities of color also endure higher financial hardships.

In 2022, 51% of Hispanic households were below the ALICE threshold - compared to 43% of White and 33% of Asian households, according to United For ALICE.

The grassroots organization says systemic racism, discrimination, and geographic barriers can limit a family's financial stability.

Borrero said she wants policy makers to know households like hers have to make tough choices with risky trade offs.

"The economy is inflated," said Borrero. "One buys food at the grocery store, and many don't buy the healthy foods they want because they can't afford to buy healthy - because it is too expensive."

Like in all states, the cost of living varies across Arkansas.

ALICE budgets are determined at the county level. These budgets include housing, child care, food, transportation, health care, technology and taxes.


get more stories like this via email