FRANKFORT, Ky. -- An independent panel of scientists convenes this week to review rule changes proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency. Critics say the changes could weaken protections of waterways across the country, restrict the use of scientific studies needed to create environmental regulations, and lower fuel-economy standards, among other changes.
Retired EPA scientist Chris Zarba said the panel is tasked with helping the agency make scientifically sound decisions.
"So, the Science Advisory Board is an independent panel of scientists," Zarba said. "Typically, the Science Advisory Board will hire 200-300 in a year to do different projects, and they review the agency's science and make recommendations so that the agency can ensure its science is sound and they can make informed decisions."
The public can submit comments through the end of May, before the board issues its final report. Zarba added the EPA isn't legally required to follow the board's suggestions. But, he said if the agency ignores the independent review, that raises red flags.
Zarba sees one of the rule changes, called "Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science," as the most troubling. He explained when environmental accidents happen - like the water crisis in Flint, Michigan - scientists collect data from local residents.
"What typically happens is scientists and researchers will go to those communities, they'll measure the water concentrations, the drinking water concentrations, they'll measure the tissue and the blood samples from the residents," he said.
Zarba said people typically allow their data to be used in studies under certain conditions.
"When those people that were exposed give the scientists and the researchers permission to use their data, they typically signed a confidentiality agreement, saying that you can use my data, you can use my information, but you can't share my name and my address and my phone number," he explained.
The rule change would mandate the data could not be used to set federal standards unless these identifying details are made publicly available, raising privacy concerns.
Zarba argues names and addresses aren't necessary for analyzing how a chemical or compound affects the body. He believes the rule change was designed to scrub data from the standard-setting process.
"Which means that the vast majority of the most powerful data goes away," he said.
The EPA maintains if the public is likely to bear the cost of complying with the agency's regulations, it should have access to all data from the scientific studies pivotal to any action taken.
get more stories like this via email
A Michigan environmental group is addressing an appeal challenging the state's decision to approve the enclosure of the Enbridge Line 5 pipeline.
Built in 1953, this pipeline transports up to 540,000 barrels of petroleum daily through the Great Lakes.
Enbridge aims to build a protective tunnel around a four mile segment at the Straits of Mackinac, which connects Lake Michigan and Lake Huron.
Environmental groups and tribal leaders want the state to reverse Enbridge's permit, citing concerns about a potential catastrophic oil spill.
The nonprofit group Oil & Water Don't Mix is dedicated to preventing oil spills and promoting clean energy - and they support the appeal.
David Holtz, an international coordinator with the group, discussed the next steps.
"And the next big hurdle that the tunnel will have will be during the federal permitting process," said Holtz, "so we're going to be focusing on that in the coming days."
Enbridge spokesperson Ryan Duffy said in an email statement that Line 5's safety is exclusively regulated by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
Enbridge maintains that it also conducts internal inspections via an MRI-like tool known as a "pig" that travels the line, recording data on the pipe's thickness and looking for cracks, dents or signs of corrosion.
Holtz said his organization will continue its efforts to make the public and the federal government aware of what needs to be done regarding Line 5.
"The need for the Biden administration," said Holtz, "to take a stand in support of its own climate policy by rejecting the tunnel."
Holtz added that the permitting process, known as the Environmental Impact Study, will be open for public comment - and is set for early next year.
Disclosure: Oil and Water Don't Mix contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Environment, Environmental Justice, Water. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
A new report shows New York will have to delay its 2030 climate goals.
The report from the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority showed the state will be a few years off from its climate goals despite a fervent push toward renewables, due to pandemic-era inflation and growing clean energy demand.
Marguerite Wells, executive director of the Alliance for Clean Energy New York, said now is not the time to slow down clean energy development.
"It's very hard to get things built in New York," Wells pointed out. "In the past few years, state agencies and private developers have worked really hard to improve the processes by which projects have to go through and get approvals on all kinds of different fronts, and those processes are mostly prepared now."
The report outlined ways New York can get 70% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030. Part of the involves increasing Tier 1 renewable energy solicitation to 5,600 gigawatt-hours annually. It also calls for allowing flexibility in procuring offshore wind projects, with the chance to get more than 9 gigawatts connected to the grid by 2035.
New York has invested billions in renewable energy projects to accomplish 70% of its goal. But the state is still coming up short 6 years before the goals must be met. Wells believes state lawmakers have to do their part to help the state remain on track. Several climate bills failed during the past legislative session, which she said could have helped homeowners transition to clean energy.
"Things like tax abatements and clean energy financing components, all kinds of stuff; the New York HEAT Act, a number of things," Wells outlined. "Many of those would have had a positive impact on homeowners looking to go green. Almost none of those bills got passed."
Wells hopes the bills get passed and signed into law during the 2025 legislative session. Plenty of other legislation such as the Build Public Renewables Act, the RAPID Act, and the All Electric Building Act ensure the state moves closer to its goals.
Disclosure: The Alliance for Clean Energy New York contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Climate Change/Air Quality, Energy Policy, and the Environment. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
By Claire Carlson for The Daily Yonder.
Broadcast version by Trimmel Gomes for Florida News Connection for the Public News Service/Daily Yonder Collaboration
A newly updated wildfire risk map could help level the playing field for rural communities who don't have the resources to conduct their own wildfire risk assessments, according to the independent research group Headwaters Economics.
The map, first created by the U.S. Forest Service under the direction of Congress in 2018, shows wildfire risks at the county level and ways to mitigate those risks. Every U.S. county and tribal area is included in the map.
"With this tool, the data is available for everyone to use, no matter whether you have your own staffing and expertise to produce these kinds of resources or not," said Kelly Pohl, associate director of Headwaters Economics, in a Daily Yonder interview.
Headwaters Economics was brought on as a partner in the mapping project in 2020. The group made the map's new updates by incorporating the latest vegetation and climate data, advancements in wildfire hazard simulation modeling, and the most recent building and housing unit information from the Census Bureau.
Wildfire Risk Is Increasing
Better understanding local wildfire risk could be more important for communities than ever because of the map's recent findings, which shows that about one-third of all Americans live in counties with high wildfire risk.
"There are a lot of states in the East, especially in the Southeast, that have wildfire risk," Pohl said. "And we do see parts of the country have higher wildfire risk than we previously understood." Oregon and Washington are two such states, according to Pohl.
In many parts of the country, climate change has caused hotter temperatures and drier conditions. This exacerbates wildfire risk.
Grant Opportunities
The Biden administration has implemented several grant programs to better equip communities with wildfire resilience tools in light of this increasing risk.
In February 2024, the administration launched a $5 million pilot program for rural emergency response agencies to convert vehicles to wildland fire engines using slip-on water tank units.
In May 2024, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) allocated another $250 million to the Community Wildfire Defense Grant Program that supports communities to develop wildfire protection plans and remove vegetation.
The wildfire risk map's new data underscores the need for the federal government to "continue these efforts through Community Wildfire Defense Grants and our work to increase the pace and scale of hazardous fuels reduction on federal and non-federal lands," according to USDA's Forest Service Chief Randy Moore, who was quoted in a press release.
Information about the grant programs and other funding opportunities can be found on the wildfire risk map's website.
Claire Carlson wrote this article for The Daily Yonder.
get more stories like this via email