WHITESBURG, Ky. -- Eastern Kentuckians soon may see their monthly utility bills go up by more than twenty dollars, if a proposed rate increase by Kentucky Power is approved by the state Public Service Commission.

Critics say the move would hurt already struggling residents and put energy-efficient options such as rooftop solar out of reach for communities.

This would be the third rate increase the company has proposed in five years.

Amber Bailey, a Letcher County resident who works as a server, said when COVID-19 began spreading in March, she pocketed $350 a week.

Since the pandemic, business has dried up and her income has been cut in half and she struggles to pay her bills.

"Why is the utility company asking for more money when we're not able to do basic bill pay right now?" Bailey inquired. "A lot of it has to do with COVID. I mean, we were already so hard hit by the closing of all the mines, and now it's gotten even worse."

Kentucky Power said it needs the rate hike to help pay for a $36 million dollar investment in smart meters.

The proposal does include bill forgiveness on accounts that were more than 30 days late as of May 28.

Anyone can comment on the issue at one of the virtual public hearings the Public Service Commission is hosting on Friday Nov. 13 and Monday Nov. 16, or they can email the commission at psc.info@ky.gov.

Along with a 25% rate increase, the new proposal calls for gutting net-metering, the one-for-one kilowatt credit on electric bills for solar customers.

Chris Woolery, residential energy coordinator for the Mountain Association, said the move would discourage businesses and local governments in the region from investing in rooftop solar, and make it harder for residential customers to reduce their energy bills.

"Rooftop solar is one of the few things that eastern Kentuckians have left accessible to respond to these increasing bills and consistent rate changes," Woolery contended.

Woolery believes the utility's proposal is unfair to the more than 165,000 eastern Kentucky residents who rely on Kentucky Power, especially as households try to stay afloat amid the economic depression from the pandemic.

"This is not the time to put the burden that should be on the investors of utilities, on the backs of eastern Kentuckians," Woolery asserted.

Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron's office recently submitted a testimony on the issue. In a written statement, a spokesperson for the Attorney General said the Attorney General's Office of Rate Intervention continues to represent Kentuckians in matters related to utility rates, and said the testimony strongly opposes Kentucky Power's proposed rate increases and argues that Kentucky's non-solar utility rate payers should not have to subsidize the operational utility costs of solar participants.

Critics disagree with the Attorney General's position that non-solar customers subsidize solar customers, and argue the Attorney General's opposition to the rate hike isn't strong enough.



get more stories like this via email

The Department of Energy is taking a close look at the economic and environmental impacts of liquefied natural gas exports, which some experts argue are driving up household energy costs and worsening climate challenges.

The report comes as LNG export projects rapidly expand, with U.S. demand at record levels and expected to grow as new facilities open.

In Virginia, household natural-gas bills have increased 50% since 2016, far outpacing inflation, said Jeremy Symons, principal at Symons Public Affairs. He attributed the increase to growing LNG exports, which limit domestic supply and drive energy costs.

"A single LNG plant - the controversial CP2 facility that's being proposed for Louisiana - would export twice as much gas every day than Virginia consumes," he said. "That means that, even though it's happening on the other side of the country, it drives up energy prices across the country."

The Chesapeake Climate Action Network Action Fund has gathered more than 5,000 signatures urging the Biden administration to pause LNG export licenses until a full review is completed.

Supporters of these exports argue that expanding infrastructure bolsters U.S. energy independence and strengthens global energy markets.

Symons encouraged the public to use the 60-day comment period to ensure that affected communities are heard.

Quentin Scott, federal policy director for the Chesapeake Climate Action Network Action Fund, emphasized the environmental risks and called on the Biden administration to act decisively.

"Secretary [Jennifer] Granholm said it in her own words," he said, "that continuing to export LNG at the scale and the trajectory in which the United States has been exporting LNG over the last few years is unsustainable and not good for consumers, not good for businesses, not good for our environmental and climate goals."

As Virginia faces rising costs and environmental pressures, the debate over LNG exports has become more urgent. Scott said he hopes the Department of Energy's findings and public comment period will bring attention to the local and national implications of America's growing liquefied natural-gas industry.

One of New York State's first energy storage deadlines is fast approaching.

A roadmap established earlier this year sets a state goal of developing 6 gigawatts of energy storage but the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act calls for 1,500 megawatts of energy storage by next year. So far, the state has more than 387 megawatts.

Kyle Rabin, large-scale renewables policy analyst at the Alliance for Clean Energy New York, said attitudes about the projects prevent more from moving ahead.

"While we see communities in other states embracing energy storage, we see that some communities across New York State have opposed these projects due to the lack of information about how this technology works, or disinformation that has spread online," Rabin observed.

Some misinformation equates energy storage with fires involving e-bike batteries, though Rabin pointed out energy storage has stricter safety regulations. He added people do not always understand the benefits of energy storage, like redistributing captured renewable energy back to the grid when it is needed. It can also aid public health and increase grid stability.

This year saw the lowest energy storage capacity installed, which could be a setback for New York's many goals. However, capacity is still increasing, and Rabin emphasized bringing more of the projects online increases regional economic benefits.

"Communities across the nation are building the batteries that are powering our electric grid, and we could do the same here in New York State," Rabin contended. "That's part of the reason New York State is pursuing this technology is, it's about complementing renewables and helping to bolster renewable energy."

Earlier this year, Governor Kathy Hochul invested more than $11.5 million in the state's clean energy workforce. The state's Energy Research and Development Authority is also putting resources into developing an energy storage workforce. As of 2023, close to 3,000 people work in energy storage and grid modernization.

Minnesota's clean energy goals are among the more ambitious in the U.S. But industry experts say it can't slow down on the innovation side to see what works and what doesn't.

The future of a program for start-ups hangs in the balance. In 2023, the state Legislature approved $3 million for the Energy Alley initiative.

It's a public-private partnership that connects clean energy entrepreneurs to industry giants and research institutions looking for innovative approaches to decarbonizing the region.

Nina Axelson is the founder of Grid Catalyst, one of the key partners for this effort. She said they're seeing promising returns so far, providing this example.

"NeoCharge, which is a company out of California," said Axelson, "they have software for optimizing your electric vehicle charging, and they're doing a pilot with the University of St. Thomas."

By successfully demonstrating their technology through Minnesota's program, NeoCharge was recognized by the U.S. Energy Department in a separate prize-money pool.

However, funding for Minnesota's Energy Alley was just a one-time expense, and advocates hope for another round this coming session.

But with the state facing projected deficits in a couple years, they're expecting a cautious spending approach.

Clean Energy Economy Minnesota also helps guide Energy Alley.

The organization's Executive Director Gregg Mast said keeping this program alive means the state will continue to be a testing ground for emerging technologies to aid the transition away from fossil fuels.

"We don't want game changing energy talent and ideas leaving our state," said Mast, "and investing in Minnesota Energy Alley is an important signal to our startups that they're supported, welcomed, and encouraged to grow right here in Minnesota."

Grid Catalyst says without that state support, there's a slower process in seeing ideas come to life.

Program backers point to Minnesota's longstanding Medical Alley - and its role in putting the state on the map for healthcare innovation - as proof these investments will pay off.

Initially, some lawmakers questioned whether the energy projects will lead to local manufacturing.

One of the program's participants, Flow Environmental Systems, plans to start producing its specialized heat pumps in Minnesota in 2026.