New state and county data show among Michigan's youngest children, there are gaps and disparities in access to crucial health, nutritional and educational services.

For instance, 35% of children up to age five are eligible for childcare subsidy credits, but only 5% actually receive them. For the Food Assistance Program, 45% of Michigan children are eligible, but only 25% are enrolled.

Kelsey Perdue, Kids Count project director at the Michigan League for Public Policy, said it is important for families to access safety-net programs.

"They really were designed to help families with low incomes afford necessities," Perdue explained. "Oftentimes eligibility requirements impact program participation and reach. That's one of many reasons why access might not meet need."

In November, the state raised the threshold for child-care subsidies to 185% of the federal poverty level, but many Michiganders live in child-care deserts, where there are not enough spots in high-quality child-care for the population of children.

The 2022 School Aid budget, passed by the Legislature and signed by the governor, includes $168 million for the Great Start Readiness Program, the state-funded preschool program, and $1.4 billion for more affordable and available child care.

Perdue pointed out there are additional steps to take, such as permanently expanding eligibility, as well as removing unnecessary barriers.

"There's currently a requirement that families where the parents do not live in the same household, in order for the parent with custody of that child to be eligible for child-care subsidies, they have to initiate a child-support case against that noncustodial parent," Perdue noted.

New fact sheets noted a history of racial segregation and disinvestment in Michigan communities have led to racial disparities in poverty levels. Children who are Black, Indigenous, Latino and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander are more likely to live under the poverty line than white children.

Ahead of Tax Day, a national receipt shows where some Ohio tax dollars were spent in 2024.

War and weaponry remain top federal expenses, with the average tax filer paying more than $3,700 to maintain America's military arsenal.

Lindsay Koshgarian, program director of the Institute for Policy Studies, said that cost could increase for 2025, since President Donald Trump has said he wants a $1 trillion military budget.

"We've been expecting to see it hit a trillion dollars some time in the near future," said Koshgarian, "but I don't think we were expecting it quite so soon as this."

She said the military budget decreased slightly after the 2008 recession, but has been noticeably increasing the past few years. A $1 trillion military budget would be the largest on record.

The average tax filer paid under $18,000 in federal taxes last year, with the greatest share supporting Americans' health through Medicaid, Medicare, the National Institutes of Health, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Trump and billionaire Elon Musk have vowed to cut at least $1 trillion in spending.

But Koshgarian warned that eliminating smaller agencies - which work to alleviate homelessness, for example - won't reap much reward.

"And so, I think what we're likely to see next year is a lot less money for things like that," said Koshgarian, "without necessarily any appreciable savings for most of us."

Americans on average pay just one penny to help keep people off the streets. The average cost for deportations and border enforcement is just under $100.

Koshgarian said that cost could jump next year as well, as Trump continues to call for the deportation of millions of undocumented immigrants.

This story was produced in association with Media in the Public Interest and funded in part by the George Gund Foundation.





get more stories like this via email

Groups that fight for greater access to health care are criticizing the Republican budget blueprint currently before the
U.S. House of Representatives, claiming it could lead to huge cuts to Medicaid -- known as Medi-Cal in the Golden State. Republicans can only afford to lose a couple of votes in order to use reconciliation to pass the bill on a simple majority vote.

Kiran Savage-Sangwan, executive director of the California Pan-Ethnic Health Network, is asking voters to get in touch with their local members of Congress.

"Devastating health-care cuts can still be stopped," she said. "With the slimmest of a majority in the House of Representatives, it would take less than a handful of House Republicans to vote 'no' on this plan to save health care for 15 million Californians who count on Medi-Cal."

The House version of the budget blueprint calls for $880 billion in cuts to the part of the government that funds health care for low-income families, seniors and people with disabilities. House Speaker Mike Johnson has said the savings are necessary to fund President Donald Trump's other budget priorities.

Adriana Ramos-Yamamoto, a senior policy analyst with the California Budget & Policy Center, said the administration's priorities stand to hurt average Californians.

"Republicans want to cut funding for basic health care and nutrition programs that millions of people rely on, all in order to help pay for tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy and corporations," said Ramos-Yamamoto. "These cuts would be a major hit to California, where federal dollars make up about a third of the state budget."

Amanda McAllister-Wallner, interim executive director of the nonprofit Health Access, notes that Congress will soon adjourn for a two-week break, sending lawmakers back to their districts.

"When these members are home in their district, we want to make sure that they're hearing from constituents -- and that they are accountable when they go back to D.C. and they start talking about the details of this plan," she explained.

Details of the campaign to protect Medi-Cal are online at fightforourhealth.org

Plans to slash funding for the Institute of Museum and Library Services have drawn swift opposition from library and union leaders, as cuts threaten Michigan's nearly 400 libraries, as well as libraries across the nation, with rural areas expected to be hit hardest.

A lawsuit has been filed on behalf of the American Library Association and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees by Democracy Forward and co-counsel Gair Gallo.

The suit asks the court to block the dismantling of the Institute, as directed by presidential executive order.

Cindy Hohl, president of the American Library Association, said the institutions are critical.

"Libraries are a trusted anchor institution, providing Americans with access to the internet and technology - and especially in small and rural areas where people may not be able to afford those services or access in their homes," she said.

Around 125,000 libraries across the nation may be affected. Supporters of the cuts maintain that reducing federal spending is essential for budget efficiency. They believe local governments should take on more responsibility and that cuts will push libraries to find alternative funding and improve efficiency.

In Michigan, libraries provide vital community programs, including job training, literacy initiatives, and senior support services. Cuts to library funding could disrupt these services, which mainly assist underserved populations, such as those in rural communities. Hohl highlighted the consequences these communities could face from cuts.

"When we're looking at our small and rural communities, if we see a decrease in federal funding to the point of where it's a third or even a half of their budget, those libraries will have to make difficult decisions and they may have to close," she added.

The American Library Association recently sent a letter urging the acting director of the Institute of Museum and Library Services not to cut federally mandated library programs.


get more stories like this via email