A significant portion of Minnesota housing was built before 1980, and these homes just endured a long and cold winter. That's renewed calls for the state to use as many weatherization resources as possible.

These programs are aligned with energy-assistance funding for low-income households. Upgrades range from reducing air leakage to furnace repairs. Proposed legislation would allow Minnesota to cover matching federal weatherization funds, and there's pre-weatherization funding to help homes correct issues before the upgrades can move forward.

Mari Ojeda, senior policy associate for energy access and equity with the group Fresh Energy, said crews encounter that too often.

"Mold, asbestos - things like that, that really are problematic for coming into someone's house," she said, "and have to defer the services because they need to address the health and safety issues first."

That means many eligible households are left waiting to reduce their energy burden. It's a particular problem in several rural Minnesota counties, where at least 80% of the housing stock is more than 40 years old.

At the State Capitol, House lawmakers are pushing to expand weatherization funding but the House and Senate remain far apart on larger energy spending bills.

Jon Fabre, supervisor of marketing programs for Otter Tail Power, said his company is a big believer in weatherization, and that these programs have evolved into a more scientific approach. With higher gas-heating costs, he said, it's another way to prevent customers from falling behind on their monthly payments.

"Utilities do well when our customers do well," he said. "We recognize that, and we feel it's just the right thing to do. We're in the business of selling energy, and we want our customers to use that energy as economically as possible to their advantage."

Ojeda said it's important to remember weatherization also can help reduce energy burdens for marginalized residents living in multi-family rental units.

"The energy burden, which is a percentage of one's income that they are spending on energy bills, is four times higher for low-income customers than for the average statewide household," she said.

Half a century after the goal was first conceived, Indianapolis and Evansville are now officially connected via an interstate highway.

The I-69 and I-465 interchange is opening this week on the southwest side of Indianapolis, as the sixth and final section between the two cities. Crews broke ground on the I-69 extension in 2008 in southwest Indiana, but the dream of an interstate connecting Evansville to Indianapolis spanned decades.

Gov. Eric Holcomb said the project completes a major economic vision for Indiana.

"The cost of not doing this far exceeded the cost of doing it," Holcomb contended. "This was an investment in us, this was an investment in our future, this was an investment in realizing our potential."

According to the Indiana Department of Transportation, I-69 features more than 26 miles of new interstate, more than 35 new lane miles of local access roads, 39 new bridges and 35 rebuilt or replaced bridges and the elimination of 14 traffic signals. It also reduces travel time from Indianapolis to Martinsville by 11 minutes.

Former Vice President and Gov. Mike Pence spoke at the opening of the highway, telling those in attendance that the project has been dreamed about in Indiana since before the end of World War II.

"It required patience, determination, vision and unwavering commitment," Pence emphasized. "Since 1944, I'm told, citizens, transportation planners, elected officials always looked forward to this day."

Crews are working on the finishing touches. I-69 now runs continuously from the Canadian border to Evansville. It will eventually go all the way to the Mexican border.


get more stories like this via email

Concerns about environmental and economic disruption by the proposed "Corridor H" four-lane highway project have led dozens of small businesses in two West Virginia towns to call for an alternative route.

The towns of Thomas and Davis cradle Blackwater Falls State Park and are surrounded by state parks, a national forest, two wilderness areas and a national wildlife refuge.

Matt Marcus, manager of Blackwater Bikes in Davis, said he is worried the highway will decrease foot traffic and dollars to independent businesses that are the backbone of the local economy.

"People are coming here to get away from the city and the highways," Marcus contended. "These trails will be negatively affected with the proximity of the road, road noise, the light pollution at night."

Critics of the Corridor H plan said a northern route would avoid the towns and help reduce the effects of a highway. Supporters of the project argued it will open up remote areas in Grant, Hardy and Tucker counties to economic development and boost travel into West Virginia from other states.

Linda Reeves, owner of The Studio Gallery in Thomas, recently signed a letter along with other business owners, expressing deep concerns about the economic impact of the proposed 10-mile Corridor H route. She said she has watched the region blossom since she opened her business in 2010.

"Things were pretty depressed here," Reeves recounted. "Then people came in and saw the possibilities and the beauty of these two towns and the charm of them, and started to revitalize, rent out spaces and start businesses and did very well."

Marcus added the state's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the project has not been publicly released but he anticipates it will be under review by the Federal Highway Administration.

"Our letter to Pete Buttigieg, we have not received an answer from that yet," Marcus emphasized. "Although we are hopeful, because the Secretary of Transportation has stated that he does not want to see communities divided by the highways."

The towns are adjacent to the Blackwater River, flagged earlier this year by the group American Rivers as one of the country's most endangered waterways. It cited threats from the Corridor H project, including construction pollution, unearthing acid mine drainage into headwater streams and disrupting wildlife habitat.


get more stories like this via email

Massachusetts will receive close to $1 billion in federal funding to replace the Cape Cod bridges.

Lawmakers said it is the largest single bridge funding grant in U.S. history and the biggest federal grant ever awarded to the Commonwealth.

Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healy called it game-changing for the state's economy.

"It is a turning point truly in terms of sustained investments in an infrastructure whose benefits will be felt for generations," Healy emphasized. "It's a victory that we celebrate today."

The nearly 90-year-old Sagamore and Bourne bridges provide the only routes on and off the Cape and are considered "functionally obsolete" despite carrying more than 30 million vehicles each year. Healy explained plans are to focus first on replacing the Sagamore Bridge before turning to the Bourne.

The Biden Administration's Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which established the Bridge Investment Program, invests a total of $40 billion over five years to help ensure the nation's most important bridges remain safe and operational. Already, the law has funded more than 7,000 bridge projects nationwide.

Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass., said it feels like "Christmas in July," with the bridge project set to create some 9,000 construction jobs.

"We're going to do this with union labor," Markey pointed out. "It is going to be one of the largest union projects in Massachusetts history."

Markey noted an additional $700 million dollar state investment will allow construction on the Sagamore Bridge to begin. It is projected to be completed sometime in 2034 with the Bourne Bridge replacement completed more than a year later. The new bridges would be built next to the old ones to avoid traffic disruptions during construction.