The Volunteer State ranks poorly in the U.S. for its overall lack of voter participation.
Over the last decade, critics say the poor turnout is partly a result of regular purges of the voter rolls, new registration requirements, and the state's restrictive voting laws that create unnecessary barriers.
Ballots are already being cast for the upcoming August 4 primary - and Debby Gould, president of the League of Women Voters of Tennessee, said so far, the early voting turnout is low.
"Almost nobody is doing early voting, which is really unusual," said Gould. "We're a state that likes to 'early vote.' But we have less than 1% of the voters who've done early voting the first three days."
Tennessee's early voting period for this primary ends July 30. Gould pointed out that voting early offers the flexibility of evening and Saturday hours, and allows Tennesseans to avoid Election Day crowds and shorten their wait times at the polls.
The August 4 election ballot is the longest in Tennessee history, with 20 pages of information to digest. Gould said the League has worked to make it easier for people to vote by posting a sample ballot online at 'Vote411.org' that anyone can study before they head to the polls.
"It allows you to go ahead and it says, 'Explore your personalized ballot and candidate information,'" said Gould. "And it allows you to actually look at every single race and see who's on the ballot and to make your selections in advance. It actually even has a printout, if you want to take a printout with you."
She explained that the ballot is lengthy because it encompasses two elections - the primary for state and federal races, and the General Election for local races.
The ballot includes candidates for more than 65 elected offices, 26 judicial positions, and in some counties, proposed charter amendments.
Gould says with such a long ballot, a few important issues haven't gotten much attention.
"Legislative races, state legislative races, are not," said Gould. "We're having some significant congressional redistricting coming up. And finally, this is the first year that school boards can be partisan positions as opposed to nonpartisan positions."
She said these results will all have significant impacts on entire communities.
Support for this reporting was provided by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.
get more stories like this via email
Abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, gun-violence and democracy itself are some of the issues Democrats said are at stake ahead of November's election.
Sen. Priya Sundareshan, D-Tucson, took part in the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee's "Summer of the States" event where the power and role of state legislatures was discussed.
She said within the Arizona legislature, Democrats are currently only two seats away from potentially flipping both chambers, which would deliver what she called a "Democratic trifecta" for the Grand Canyon State. Sundareshan has been an advocate for protecting contraception and reproductive rights in Arizona.
"It was Democrats who led the effort, successfully, to repeal our 1864 abortion ban," Sundareshan pointed out. "We got one or two Republicans to join with us but that was not an effort that the Republican majority led."
Sundareshan and other Democrats are banking on abortion to drive voters to the polls this November in Arizona, where President Joe Biden won by just 10,000 votes in 2020. Recent polls show Biden is currently behind former President Donald Trump in their likely rematch.
Meanwhile, the coalition Arizona for Abortion Access recently submitted 800,000 signatures to get a measure on the ballot to enact a constitutional protection for abortion.
Sundareshan noted Republican lawmakers have been able to bypass Gov. Katie Hobbs' veto pen by placing several ballot referrals to voters she argued are anti-democracy, anti-immigrant and anti-worker. House House Concurrent Resolution 2060 will be on the November ballot. It could expand regulations for businesses to verify the status of independent subcontractors and make it more difficult for migrants to access public benefits.
While backers said it will achieve what the federal government has failed to do, Sundareshan countered the proposal will only hurt Arizona.
"We are the backstop against attacks on our democracy and Arizona is at the forefront of these attacks," Sundareshan emphasized.
Sundareshan added all eyes will be on Arizona as a key battleground state. She reminded voters while the presidential race does garner lots of buzz, state lawmakers are vitally important in safeguarding the everyday freedoms and protections citizens reap.
get more stories like this via email
A U.S. Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity from prosecution is raising concerns about the power of the executive branch - and the future of democracy. In one of its final decisions of the term, the majority of justices ruled in Trump versus United States that presidents are immune from criminal prosecution when performing "official acts."
Adrienne Evans, executive director of United Vision for Idaho, said this means the president can break the law and not worry about being investigated.
"Do we trust whomever is elected next not to use that power? Because right now," she explained, "everything hinges not that the power has been granted but will there be a president that we have who will not use that power to their favor?"
In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the ruling makes the president a "king above the law."
Evans noted this issue has been compounded by the politicization of the courts, and added that the courts have been weaponized to serve the party in power.
"We have always lived in a system where we had relatively stable systems of checks and balances. What this latest decision by the Supreme Court did was it put all of the power in the hands of the executive and, in subsequent rulings, also undermined the administration of the state," she continued.
Evans said Congress could take steps to rein in the Supreme Court by instituting term limits, creating an enforceable code of ethics and expanding the number of justices on the court, but added that Congress will have to act soon to prevent a worst-case scenario in which democracy erodes completely.
"It's going to take the will of the people demanding that their congressional representatives vote for those measures, that we take this moment as a dire warning that we have to reset course if we still believe that democracy is our best path forward," she said.
Disclosure: United Vision for Idaho contributes to our fund for reporting on Civic Engagement, Civil Rights, Community Issues and Volunteering. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
In a significant turnaround, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has reversed its stance on ballot dropboxes - making them legal again in a 4-3 ruling.
Two years ago, when conservatives controlled the court, the justices restricted the use of dropboxes. The ruling said they could only be placed in local election clerks' offices, and a voter had to return their own ballot in person. However, when Justice Janet Protasiewicz was elected last April, control shifted on the high court.
Nick Ramos, executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, is pleased with the decision and said his organization has known all along dropboxes are safe and improve voting access.
"They are a way that the electorate can access our democracy when it isn't necessarily so convenient," Ramos argued. "For our health care workers, the rural community, single parents out there."
Conservative members of the Wisconsin Supreme Court were against reviewing the case, stressing the significance of upholding and respecting legal precedent.
Luke Berg, deputy counsel at the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, condemned the ruling, calling it "one of the worst decisions from the court in recent memory." He is convinced it was political and not what he thinks a court should be doing.
"I think it's deeply ironic that the court announced, by judicial fiat, its policy preference on a voting issue on the same day that it issued an opinion praising separation of powers, and then violated those very principles in the other opinion it issued," Berg asserted.
Ramos maintained the decision to make ballot boxes more widely available sends a clear message not only to the people of Wisconsin but the entire country.
"Especially after the year we've had, with bringing new maps, after living under the extreme partisan gerrymander that we've lived under for over a decade," Ramos emphasized. "It's a message of hope."
Ramos added he is proud of the volunteers, activists and key organizations who worked to bring about the change.
Support for this reporting was provided by The Carnegie Corporation of New York.
get more stories like this via email