Idaho Power has commissioned a study which found the rate it pays for rooftop solar customers to send their power back to the grid should be lowered.
The monopoly energy company sent its study to the Idaho Public Utilities Commission for consideration, suggesting net metering rates be cut by roughly 60%.
Alex McKinley, owner of Empowered Solar in Boise, said the state has a great solar resource, but a cut in rates would likely hurt efforts to install panels on roofs.
"Their goal as an investor-owned utility is to make profits, and they see residential distributed generation as a threat to their profits," McKinley asserted. "I think that comes out pretty clearly in the way this study was conducted."
Idaho Power said a reduction in rates is a matter of fairness. It said infrastructure costs, for example, are pushed onto other customers at the current net-metering rate. The utilities commission is taking public comment on the study's results.
Mike Engle, chair of the Portneuf Resource Council, does not believe the suggested rates will kill the solar industry but noted it would take longer for customers to pay off their systems.
Engle argued it would be best to motivate people to move toward rooftop solar with the current rates because it will protect the environment and also supports local economies with jobs.
"Idaho Power and the Public Utilities Commission should ensure that all of Idaho's residents have the ability to participate in Idaho Power's goal of migrating to clean energy," Engle emphasized.
Idaho Power has committed to using 100% renewable energy by 2045. Engle is pushing for a third party to evaluate the numbers in Idaho Power's study.
McKinley noted Idaho and other states are feeling the pressure from a changing climate, putting strain on energy grids.
"Distributed generation makes the whole grid more resilient," McKinley stressed. "The public, whether they're someone who has rooftop solar or not, wants a more resilient grid."
get more stories like this via email
As Congress prepares to vote this week on a budget bill which would repeal solar energy tax credits, Florida solar advocates warned the move would jeopardize the state's economy.
According to industry data, the tax credits have funded more than $12 billion in clean energy projects and supported 175,000 jobs in Florida.
Caleb Quaid, founder of the Tampa-based environmental consulting firm Regenerative Shift, said his company's landmark solar project relies on the funding.
"This project would not have been possible without these clean energy tax credits," Quaid acknowledged. "They are currently in the process of installing what would be the largest rooftop solar project on a school in Florida history. In addition to providing lower cost of energy for Manatee Schools for the Arts, this project is also paying all of its laborers prevailing wages."
Opponents of the tax credits argue renewable energy should be able to compete without help from the government. Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., is facing mounting pressure to defend the solar tax credits because his district hosts many jobs related to clean energy.
Tim McMurray, chief financial officer at the Manatee School for the Arts, argued money saved by solar tax credits is often reinvested into local communities.
"The money saved goes back into the business," McMurray explained. "In our instance, it goes right back to the classrooms. It provides more deeper investments in STEM classes. It provides school counselors and faculty."
Ben Delman, senior director of communications for the advocacy group Solar United Neighbors, said all energy sectors receive some federal backing, so it should not come as a surprise solar energy also needs government support.
"Every source of energy we have is subsidized in some form," Delman pointed out. "What these investments that the tax credits and such, put solar on a level playing field to help families and small businesses save money."
With Florida ranking second nationally in solar installations, advocates said the stakes are high as they urged residents to contact lawmakers ahead of the vote this week.
get more stories like this via email
Indiana now classifies natural gas and propane as clean energy under a new state law.
Gov. Mike Braun signed Senate Bill 178, granting the fuels eligibility for tax credits and other incentives.
Sam Carpenter, executive director of the nonprofit Hoosier Environmental Council, opposed the measure, arguing the fuels significantly contribute to climate pollution.
"Methane is around 38 times more potent as a greenhouse gas," Carpenter pointed out. "What happens is there's a lot of leakage that happens in the drilling, in the extraction, the storage, the transportation, even the burning of methane."
Proponents of the bill argued it supports an "all of the above" approach to reduce energy costs for Hoosiers.
Carpenter cautioned investing in natural gas infrastructure could backfire. He noted the high costs and slow pace of building pipelines and transmission systems. He also emphasized Indiana's energy landscape is already shifting.
"Ninety percent of new generation coming online is renewable," Carpenter stressed. "It's wind, and it's solar, and it's battery storage, and that's really based on price, and it's based on the competitive factor, and it's based on timeliness."
Carpenter suggested the measure will likely have minimal immediate impact unless federal policies change. The bill passed with bipartisan support in the General Assembly.
get more stories like this via email
Lawmakers in the U.S. House will vote on a bill this week affecting Virginia's ability to create stronger emissions standards for vehicles and trucks.
The bill targets "California emissions standards," policies which call for 100% of cars sold to be electric or emissions-free by 2035. That policy has been partially or fully adopted by Virginia and 16 other states.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on his first day in office to repeal the standards, leading to the legislative effort.
Rob Sargent, program director of Coltura, an energy transition nonprofit, said the federal government should be increasing access to electric vehicles instead of going against policies that promote them.
"EV tax credits and any programs designed to make EVs available to the American people are key," he said, "and can unlock decades of savings for people for what has been a strain on their household finances."
A report by the independent Government Accountability Office stated that Congress does not have the authority to repeal the emissions standards. Supporters of the bill have said banning gas cars is an affront to consumer freedom.
More than a half million Virginians are considered "gas super users," meaning they use significantly more gasoline than the average driver.
Sargent said repealing strong emissions standards would make it harder for states to reduce their carbon footprint.
"If Congress acts to pull the rug out from under those states' ability to take action to make cars cleaner in their state," he said, "then it also will undercut the availability of electric vehicles for consumers that would save them money."
The Senate is considering a similar bill despite opposition from within the Legislature.
get more stories like this via email