As winter approaches and renters seek home repairs or apply for new housing, North Dakota assistance groups are reminding people about expanded protections to address the rights of the LGBTQ community.
In 2020, a U.S. Supreme Court decision affirmed the prohibiting of sex discrimination under the Civil Rights Act extends to sexual orientation and gender identity.
North Dakota and the Biden administration have taken steps to enforce protections, including in the area of housing.
Kelly Gorz, associate director of the High Plains Fair Housing Center, said discrimination is still a problem for people trying to find a place to live.
"If they would be touring with their sexual partner who is the same sex, they would be denied housing," Gorz explained. "So, told that nothing's available when it is, or just told that they 'don't want people like that living there.' "
Despite the protections, the Center worries too few people know about them as they apply for a rental unit or work with a landlord. The group does intake work for people who feel they've been discriminated against, and will advocate for them if they want to file a formal complaint.
When it comes to housing discrimination, Gorz acknowledged North Dakota has been fairly aggressive in establishing protections, especially as they align with federal policy.
"And they're really better, because we do have additional protections beyond those federal laws, age discrimination and marital status discrimination," Gorz pointed out.
While it gets high marks for housing anti-discrimination laws, national scorecards, looking at human rights issues, say North Dakota needs to do better in other areas, such as transgender health care and preventing hate crimes.
Anyone experiencing housing discrimination can also contact the North Dakota Department of Labor and Human Rights, or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Disclosure: The High Plains Fair Housing Center contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Civil Rights, Housing/Homelessness, and Human Rights/Racial Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Anyone who uses a cell phone or laptop shares hundreds of personal data points, and a New Mexico advocacy group wants that information better protected.
Nathan Saavedra, programs manager for Equality New Mexico, said personal information such as gender, marital status, household income and educational level are catalogued by tech organizations and data brokers.
"We see data privacy as the primary gap that exists, especially in New Mexico, for protecting all people," he said. "And this is especially true for LGBTQ folks, women or anyone who is seeking reproductive or gender-affirming health care, immigrants, political dissidents."
Two privacy bills introduced in New Mexico's legislative session this year - the Community Safety and Privacy Act and the Patient Records Privacy Act - failed to pass. Saavedra said he believes when it comes to sharing data, consumers should always have the ability to "opt-in" rather than "opt-out," which assumes consent for data gathering unless users actively decline.
Saavedra admitted that the term "data privacy" can be confusing, but he said the current political climate makes it important to understand because hostile agencies can use information to discriminate, harass and persecute people. He noted that at President Donald Trump's inauguration last year, the most exclusive seats were reserved for powerful tech CEOs, who also are among the world's richest men.
Saavedra said he sees it as a sign the Trump administration won't prioritize confidentiality.
"So, we see data privacy and the information that is viewable by these data brokers or any organization or even an individual who wishes to purchase or find this data is a main priority for protecting vulnerable New Mexicans," he said.
He added that Equality New Mexico will continue to push lawmakers to pass new data privacy laws.
A 2023 Pew Research Center survey found 71% of Americans were worried about government use of people's data. Additionally, 67% said they understand little to nothing about what companies are doing with their personal data.
Disclosure: Equality New Mexico contributes to our fund for reporting on Civil Rights, Human Rights/Racial Justice, LGBTQIA Issues, Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
By Vanessa Davidson / Broadcast version by Farah Siddiqi reporting for the Kent State NewsLab-Ohio News Connection Collaboration.
Ohio’s House Bill 8, known as the “Parents’ Bill of Rights,” will take effect April 9.
The bill was signed into law in January. It requires K-12 public schools to adopt a policy for parents to be notified by their child’s school if they have “any substantial change in the student's services, including counseling services,” or in their “mental, emotional, or physical health or well-being.”
This includes any request by the student to “identify as a gender that does not align with the student's biological sex,” meaning if they are not already out to their parents, schools will be required to do it for them.
Advocates for LGBTQ+ youth worry the bill will cause unnecessary anxiety for students.
“It’s part of such a long string of attacks against [queer and trans students’] identities and their very right to exist,” said Mallory Golski, civic engagement and advocacy manager at Kaleidoscope Youth Center. She says young people are considering leaving the state because, “while this legislation just targets K-12 schools right now, they know it’s only a matter of time until their lives are impacted beyond that.”
And educators worry that the bill will cause conflicts between district guidelines and state law.
“It really puts counselors and other people in this rock and a hard place position because it’s so absolutist,” said Carrie Frederick, a school counselor at East Columbus High School.
The bill says parents have “a fundamental right” to make decisions about their children in schools.
Ohio State Rep. D. J. Swearingen, one of the two primary sponsors of the bill, said in a press release, “I’m grateful to see the Parents’ Bill of Rights officially cross the finish line. This critical legislation will ensure parents have a voice when it comes to the health and wellbeing of their children.”
Swearingen, former State Rep. Sara Carruthers, the other primary sponsor of the bill, and others who testified for the bill did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
Educator concerned about supporting queer students
Frederick said he worries about how the bill will affect students’ coming out processes.
“I definitely know there are students out there that are going to have a lot of anxiety, even if maybe they don’t need to,” Frederick said. “They don’t know that.”
Frederick said school counselors help students navigate the uncertainty of how parents might react to their coming out. Counselors can walk students through the typical process, which starts with coming out to one or two people a child is close with, then a small friend group and, finally, adults they trust.
“The vast majority, they would like to come out to their parents as part of that process, but they’re not always going to be ready the first day,” Frederick said. “We miss that opportunity, if the immediate reaction is, ‘I have to tell your parents right now,’ then now, we’ve broken that student’s trust.”
Frederick said his district’s ethical standards say that part of supporting students is not outing them to anyone they do not want to be outed to. After H.B. 8 takes effect, those guidelines are now in direct conflict with state law, he said.
Scott DiMauro, president of the Ohio Education Association, said his organization is working in collaboration with the Ohio School Counselor Association to analyze the law and give their members the best guidance they can to adhere to the law and still fulfill their responsibilities as educators.
But, he said the definitions in the bill are vague, and a lot of it is open to interpretation.
“Does an offhanded comment by a student that’s made to another student but overheard by a teacher, does that rise to the level where a teacher needs to call the parent?” he said. “That’s one of the big concerns that we had about the bill is that the bill, in a lot of ways, creates more questions than answers.”
Ensuring students feel safe at school
DiMauro said the bill creates a sense of fear for both educators and students, as well as the concern that people are going to be looking over their shoulders, censoring themselves and limiting what they teach due to fear of a lawsuit or an adverse reaction from a parent.
A 2023 study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that an estimated 40% of transgender and questioning students were bullied at school, and 69% of questioning students and 72% of transgender students experienced “persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness, a marker for experiencing depressive symptoms.”
“Allowing somebody to be themselves takes away that one aspect of their focus that day,” said Golski of the Kaleidoscope Youth Center. “By removing that one factor and knowing that, ‘Okay, when I go into this classroom, at least my teacher is going to accept me,’ that opens up their ability to focus on what they actually need to be focusing on in schools.”
Frederick said his plan after April 9 is to be as transparent as possible with his students, making sure they are aware of what information he has to share with their guardians before they tell him confidential information. But, the younger the student, the harder it will be for them to understand.
Golski said districts can comply with the law in gentle ways, too. She suggested that if a student discloses information about their sexual orientation for the first time, teachers or counselors might report it to a family member who may be more supportive than another, for instance.
“Teachers shouldn’t just jump to not supporting their queer and trans students at all,” she said.
She also said districts should be cautious before jumping to immediately creating an overly harsh policy, and that adults in schools should make sure it is widely known that they are supportive of queer and trans students.
DiMauro suggested joining the LGBTQ+ caucus at the national and state level, and in schools, putting up ‘I’m here’ safe stickers on windows or places students will see so they know they can trust teachers to be on their side.
“At the end of the day, it’s these young people’s lives, and they’re the ones who have to wake up every day and get ready for school knowing that they’re going to have to face this as an actual reality,” Golski said. “Legislators, by targeting queer and trans students with this legislation, are bullying students, and that is the real detraction from students’ ability to receive a quality education.”
This collaboration is produced in association with Media in the Public Interest and funded in part by the George Gund Foundation.
get more stories like this via email
Today, Montanans will gather outside the Statehouse to observe International Transgender Day of Visibility, during a legislative session that has targeted that community.
More than 500 bills aimed at the LGBTQ+ community have been brought to legislatures across the U.S. this session. Montana lawmakers introduced more than 20 - the highest rate in the region.
Last week, Gov. Greg Gianforte signed two such bills - one prohibiting trans girls and women from playing school sports and another dictating access to public bathrooms, locker rooms, and changing rooms.
Julia Maxon, program director for Catalyst Montana, said the Day of Visibility is timely.
"While we should celebrate and uplift trans people every day," said Maxon, "it is especially important now because of all of the attempts to attack the trans community coming from our state Legislature."
In a video on X, Gianforte said the laws promote "fairness, privacy and security."
The American Civil Liberties Union, in support of a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against House Bill 121, argues that it violates the right to privacy guaranteed in the State Constitution.
Maxon said trans Montanans are "fellow Montanans" and that lawmakers' efforts to target that community come to the detriment of all residents.
"Like other Montanans," said Maxon, "we just want the Legislature to focus on issues facing all of us, including but not limited to affordable housing, access to health care, and child care."
The Day of Visibility observance will be at the Capitol's flag plaza at noon. Maxon said it will include speakers and activities meant to "build community and solidarity."
get more stories like this via email