A new study out this week reports Maryland could realize economic benefits from agricultural conservation efforts in the Chesapeake Bay region.

The Chesapeake Bay Foundation is helping to implement the Clean Water Blueprint established in 2010, which seeks to restore the bay's water quality along with rivers and streams feeding into the bay by 2025.

One of the approaches used is creating forest buffers along waterways to help capture runoff.

Carolyn Alkire, co-owner of Key-Log Economics and the report's co-author, describes how adding forest buffers would increase jobs in the region.

"The direct impact of an increase in investment in forest buffers would be more jobs for people who are planting the trees," Alkire pointed out. "An indirect impact would be more jobs for tree nursery workers, because the tree planters would buy the seedlings from the nursery, and an induced impact would be more jobs in the grocery stores, where tree planters and nursery workers buy their food."

The report stated implementing all the planned conservation practices in Maryland would translate into $41 million in economic output and support 423 jobs.

The Clean Water Blueprint targets include reducing pollutants which come as a byproduct of agricultural practices. The Chesapeake Bay Foundation reported in order to meet the 2025 pollution targets, more than 90% of the remaining reductions must come from agriculture.

Rob Schnabel, restoration scientist for the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, said farmers are changing their practices to improve resilience and reduce polluted runoff.

"Many of the farmers that we're working with are actually converting corn and soybean fields, monoculture fields, into permanent diverse cover pastures, which is really a critical practice for water quality," Schnabel explained. "Restoring the soil sponge, which makes farms more resilient during times of drought by helping to hold in water and also reducing flooding during big storm events."

Schnabel added diverse cover pastures also help farmers practice prescribed grazing where animal grazing is rotated, so pastures have time to recover.

The Port of New York and New Jersey is receiving funding to cut emissions. It's part of the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Ports Program.

Of the $3 billion national grant, the port will get more than $347 million to monitor emissions and transition equipment to zero-emission power.

Jordan Stutt, CALSTART's northeast region senior director, said zero-emission vehicles can help port operations in many ways.

"So, we're going to see everything from electric forklifts and drayage trucks," said Stutt, "to shore power systems - to help major ships use electricity at ports, instead of burning diesel while they idle there for days."

Particulate emissions have been steadily declining at the port, but carbon emissions are rising.

In 2019, the port of New York and New Jersey was one of the highest emitting ports nationwide, with one million tons of carbon being released from it.

Cutting port emissions will have widespread benefits for nearby communities. Research shows municipalities near ports often face poor air quality and the health impacts of it.

Stutt noted that this $3 billion is going to existing technologies for ports to reduce emissions. He said the money's other uses will help bolster ports' climate-friendly futures.

"Through these investments, we will gather really critical data to help us better understand the benefits of this transition," said Stutt. "It'll help build out the workforce to support deployment and maintenance of all this equipment, and it'll help encourage increased manufacturing of zero-emission equipment."

He added that these will help lower costs for the next generation of zero-emission vehicles.

By already having these vehicles and the equipment, it will ensure lower costs in the future - meaning the government funds won't be as necessary to make up the cost differential.

From cow waste to clean energy, Michigan will soon have a couple of new state-backed digesters to get the job done.

Last Tuesday, the Michigan Strategic Fund approved Freehold Energy RNG to pursue a tax-exempt bond for its project.

The company plans to build facilities in St. Joseph and Muskegon counties to produce renewable natural gas from dairy waste.

The estimated cost for the project is between $75 to $80 million of local investment. Freehold's Principal Project Developer CW Alexander shared the environmental benefits of the initiative.

"It equates to about 4.3 million gallons of gasoline equivalent per year, which equates to about 90,000 metric tons of CO2 reduction," said Alexander, "or about equivalent of 20,000 cars removed off the road."

Construction is expected to begin next year - with the facilities becoming operational in 2026.

Digesters can range from small systems for single farms to large facilities handling waste from thousands of cows - producing biogas and nutrient-rich fertilizers as byproducts.

Alexander highlighted additional benefits, such as odor reduction around farms. He also said his company plans to repurpose excess sand used by farmers for cow bedding.

"With the benefit of that is it improves agricultural land quality, because you're not moving sand onto the fields," said Alexander. "It's now just the manure as fertilizer, once processed, is going onto the fields. So that's a pretty significant benefit to the land quality over the long term."

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's MI Healthy Climate Plan aims for Michigan to achieve 100% clean energy by 2040, and carbon neutrality by 2050.






get more stories like this via email

Nationwide, 76% of Trump voters and 86% of all voters oppose attempts to weaken the Environmental Protection Agency, according to a new poll commissioned by the Environmental Protection Network.

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey recently asked a federal court to block a new EPA rule aimed at reducing emissions from power plants.

President-elect Donald Trump last month announced former New York Congressman Lee Zeldin as his pick to run the EPA.

Matt George, partner and head of research for the firm Seven Letter, said the data show the vast majority of voters want legislation such as the Clean Air Act to remain in place, and want strengthened regulations to curb pollution.

"The majority of voters really do recognize the value of regulations that keep our air and water clean and keep us healthy," George reported. "They want to maintain those regulations."

The poll also found opposition to weakening the EPA is higher among Latino, suburban and independent voters who shifted Republican in this year's presidential election. Critics of a second Trump administration said the president-elect wants to dismantle the EPA by significantly cutting staff and funding. According to the League of Conservation Voters, during his time in office, Zeldin repeatedly voted against clean-water and clean-air legislation.

A recent Environmental Protection Network report found widespread benefits from agency regulations, showing rules passed during the last four years will save more than 200,000 lives through 2050, prevent more than 100 million asthma attacks, and deliver more than $250 billion in net public health gains each year.

George added support for the EPA has increased since 2017.

"We see that those numbers have only gotten better in 2024, in this year where we have one percentage point gain in 'strengthened' or 'expanded,' but we see that the numbers for 'weakened' or 'eliminated' have been cut effectively in half," George explained.

Without knowing who Trump had named as EPA administrator, almost two-thirds of voters who supported Trump in the election expressed concern his EPA pick would put the interests of corporations ahead of protecting clean water, clean air and public health. Last week the agency announced it will likely allow the state of California permission to ban the sales of new gas-powered cars and trucks by 2035.


get more stories like this via email