Five of Six Nebraska Municipalities Vote in Favor of Banning Abortion
Thursday, November 10, 2022
Voters in five Nebraska towns approved local ordinances banning abortion care in this week's midterm elections, but reproductive health care advocates said more significant threats are likely to come in the new legislative session.
Scout Richters, senior legal and policy counsel for the ACLU of Nebraska, said measures that conflict with state law are not enforceable, and abortion remains legal at the state level, but she worries they will create a chilling effect.
"They harm Nebraskans by stigmatizing abortion care," Richters contended. "Really sowing a spirit of fear and confusion among those Nebraskans that live in these places."
Ordinances banning abortion within city limits were passed in Arnold, Brady, Hershey, Paxton and Wallace. A similar ordinance failed in Curtis. Blue Hill, Hayes Center -- which counts itself a member of the group "Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn" -- and Stapleton passed bans before the election.
Proponents argued towns have the power to regulate health and welfare, and believe the ordinances are necessary to protect the culture of communities and to send a message to state lawmakers.
Abortion-rights advocates are concerned about razor-thin margins when senators convene in January. Legislative Bill 933, a trigger-bill banning abortion after Roe v. Wade was overturned, was blocked in the last session through a filibuster, which requires 17 senators.
Richters stressed, while Nebraskans may have different views on abortion, it remains a deeply personal health care decision.
"So regardless of how any one individual feels about abortion, when someone makes that personal decision, they need to be able to access care without government interference," Richters asserted. "That decision needs to be between a patient and her doctor."
A poll conducted in March found 55% of Nebraskans oppose banning abortions, compared with 40% who support a ban.
Richters noted Nebraska's laws already impose significant barriers to abortion care, which disproportionately impact people of color, young people, low-wage workers and people living in rural areas.
"Forcing someone to carry a pregnancy against their will can have devastating and lasting consequences," Richters emphasized. "The bottom line is that a patient's health should drive medical decisions, not a politician's beliefs."
get more stories like this via email
Lawmakers in the Commonwealth are considering legislation to ensure police use of facial-recognition technology also protects people's privacy and civ…
Next week, Ohio farmers and their advocates head to Washington, D.C., to push for shifting federal programs toward growing nutritious food, as …
Social justice advocates have just launched a new public education campaign. It's called "Just Safe," and it's aimed at changing the conversation …
Reducing the number of wildlife-vehicle collisions is the goal of a bill before the New Mexico Legislature this session. Sen. Mimi Stewart, D-…
A Nevada nonprofit is celebrating a 94% graduation rate among its high school seniors for the 2021-2022 school year. Tami Hance-Lehr. CEO and state …
Super Bowl LVII is right around the corner, which means Arizona will see hefty spending and wide exposure because of the massive sporting event…
Health and Wellness
It is not a pandemic yet, but eye doctors worry the constant use of digital devices could eventually result in long-term health problems for many …
Maine's small farmers are encouraged to complete the latest U.S. Department of Agriculture census to ensure they have a voice in federal decisions …