Thousands of wireless transmitters could pop up across unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County in the next few years if the Board of Supervisors approves an ordinance at its meeting tomorrow.
The ordinance sets height standards and requires camouflage but also makes it possible to approve them without a public hearing.
Brenda Martinez, a volunteer with FiberFirstLA and a Los Angeles resident, said community members should have a say in where small-cell wireless boxes are placed.
"If you have a light post right in front of your house, they might place it there; you will have no say," Martinez noted. "The way they usually do it now is that you will be notified, they have to have a hearing, they have to give you a chance to appeal. None of that will happen. "
The county has not updated its rules for wireless in decades, so officials say the change is badly needed and is intended to help close the digital divide by ramping up faster internet to underserved communities. The Supervisors gave preliminary approval three weeks ago, so if it passes again, it would take effect next month.
Currently, the county requires a conditional-use permit with public input on each wireless transmitter.
Bruce Durbin, supervising regional planner in the county's Department of Regional Planning, said it has become problematic because the Federal Communications Commission requires government agencies to approve or deny them within two months.
"A conditional-use permit in California requires 30-days public notice, a public hearing in front of the commission," Durbin explained. "And to be able to approve that all within 60 days, it's impossible."
Martinez emphasized she worries about possible fire hazards from the wiring in the boxes, and about the health effects of radiofrequency radiation coming from the boxes. Durbin pointed out the county is not allowed to weigh in on the safety of the equipment.
"I'm respectful of those concerns about the RF output," Durbin acknowledged. "But the fact is, the FCC forbids local agencies from considering those impacts. The thinking is that FCC has tested this equipment, and it complies with federal standards, and it has no place in the land-use regulation."
The wireless industry's trade association, the CTIA, did not respond by deadline but has argued for years that inconsistent, time-consuming rules for siting small-cell boxes is slowing the spread of high-speed internet.
W. Scott McCollough, an attorney who consults on telecom issues and works with FiberFirstLA, noted the wireless industry has supported similar fast-track ordinances all across the country.
"They find public involvement in their facility placement decision to be bothersome, and they want to get rid of it," McCollough asserted. "The main point is to dispense with notice and hearing and any environmental review. That's what it's all about."
McCollough added fiber-optic cable is much more secure and reliable compared to wireless and already has been laid in wealthier areas. He stressed companies are balking at extending fiber to homes in underserved communities because it's less profitable.
get more stories like this via email
FBI data show North Dakotans lost nearly $6 million to cryptocurrency scams in 2023 and a bill advancing in the Legislature would try to limit those losses by adding safeguards to a financial trend with little oversight.
The measure, overwhelmingly approved by the House this week, would require operators of crypto kiosks to be licensed. Experts said the kiosks, which look similar to a traditional ATM, are used to convert real cash to virtual money like Bitcoin but they also can serve as a vehicle for fraud.
Rep. Ben Koppelman, R-West Fargo, said someone might pose as a law enforcement officer, warning a person about suspicious activity with the funds in their bank account.
"They suggest depositing it in this kiosk and, of course, it goes to the fraudster's account and it's tough to get that money back," Koppelman explained.
One of the other provisions stated receipts would need to be provided so law enforcement agencies have a paper trail to work with in the event of a scam. Koppelman pointed out compromises were added in response to concerns from cryptocurrency industry groups, including language dealing with daily transaction limits.
Jacob Rued, fraud investigator for First Western Bank in Minot, told lawmakers at a hearing earlier in the session, people who are taken advantage of often have little to no knowledge of how crypto transactions work.
"Their trust in the kiosk (is) often based on the false and manipulated idea that because this kiosk is real, and, 'I can physically interact with it in my community, that must mean that it has been vetted,'" Rued noted.
Experts said unlike mainstream banking, virtual currency is decentralized and regulation has been slow to catch up. Groups such as AARP also testified in support of the bill, noting the effect the activity has had on older adults at risk of losing their life savings. Watchdogs said younger generations, too, are targeted for this type of fraud.
The measure now heads to the Senate.
Disclosure: AARP North Dakota contributes to our fund for reporting on Civic Engagement, Community Issues and Volunteering, Health Issues, and Senior Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Some New York members of Congress are trying to repeal bank overdraft fee regulations.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau created a rule capping account overdraft fees at $5, which the agency estimates could save people nationwide $5 billion.
But a bill coming up for a vote in the U.S. House this week would repeal it, allowing banks to charge up to $35 for these fees.
Rebecca Garrard, interim co-executive director of Citizen Action of New York, said overdraft fees often harm those who can least afford them.
"It's devastating," said Garrard, "and it contributes to debt that people are unable to remove themselves from, and exacerbates a crisis of poverty and affordability that's already problematic."
Though some New York U.S. Representatives, like Rep. Dan Goldman, D-Manhattan, favor maintaining the overdraft fee limitations, others, like Rep. Mike Lawler, R-Pearl River, are under pressure to end these protections.
New York is among the states that have also addressed this issue. In 2022, the Department of Financial Services developed a rule reducing or eliminating some of the fees banks can charge.
The bill is seen as one of many moves to undermine the CFPB. The agency's acting director, Russell Vought, implemented a stop work order and numerous employees were laid off - until a federal judge blocked the layoffs.
Christine Chen Zinner, senior policy counsel for Americans for Financial Reform, said the stop work order is a green light for financial companies to defraud and gouge customers.
"I mean, every corporate bad actor in finance has a free pass from the Trump administration to make life more expensive and less fair for families all over the country," Zinner observed.
A CFPB report finds 81% of households that frequently incur overdraft fees had difficulty paying bills in the last year.
A 2024 Data for Progress poll finds voters across the political spectrum approve of the agency's mission, although most aren't fully aware of its role.
Disclosure: Americans for Financial Reform contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Campaign Finance Reform/Money in Pol, Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
This session, Minnesota lawmakers are expected to take a strong look at preventing more fraud attempts against state government. Meanwhile, consumer advocates hope they do not forget about separate scams increasingly targeting everyday citizens.
Organizations such as AARP said consumer fraud has reached a crisis point, with federal data showing U.S. consumers reported losing more than $10 billion to fraud in 2023, a record high.
Cathy McLeer, state director of AARP Minnesota, said in a digital world, it is getting harder for authorities to clamp down on the threats and give people an avenue to recoup what they lost.
"In many cases, these are bad actors who are overseas," McLeer explained. "You can't track them down. And it's very, very difficult for anyone who has been defrauded to get even some of those resources back."
McLeer pointed out such situations can be especially harder on older adults because their life savings can quickly evaporate.
A proposed bill would create a state-managed restitution fund, where proceeds from civil penalties would be redirected and awarded to fraud victims having trouble getting their money back. The bill is sponsored by lawmakers in both parties but it is unclear whether it will gain traction amid other priorities.
A key provision in the bill said Minnesota's attorney general has to bring a case against the scammers and obtain a court order. McLeer argued the extra tool might prompt more people falling prey to fraud to speak up.
"We also know that so much fraud is underreported," McLeer observed. "We believe that having a Consumer Fraud Restitution Fund would provide the incentive for more individuals to report financial crimes, frauds and scams when they happen."
A handful of other states have created similar funds, including North Dakota in 2023. Meanwhile, AARP Minnesota will host an online discussion on the topic Thursday at 10 a.m. CT. The public is invited to take part.
Disclosure: AARP Minnesota contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy and Priorities, Consumer Issues, Health Issues, and Senior Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email