Thousands of wireless transmitters could pop up across unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County in the next few years if the Board of Supervisors approves an ordinance at its meeting tomorrow.

The ordinance sets height standards and requires camouflage but also makes it possible to approve them without a public hearing.

Brenda Martinez, a volunteer with FiberFirstLA and a Los Angeles resident, said community members should have a say in where small-cell wireless boxes are placed.

"If you have a light post right in front of your house, they might place it there; you will have no say," Martinez noted. "The way they usually do it now is that you will be notified, they have to have a hearing, they have to give you a chance to appeal. None of that will happen. "

The county has not updated its rules for wireless in decades, so officials say the change is badly needed and is intended to help close the digital divide by ramping up faster internet to underserved communities. The Supervisors gave preliminary approval three weeks ago, so if it passes again, it would take effect next month.

Currently, the county requires a conditional-use permit with public input on each wireless transmitter.

Bruce Durbin, supervising regional planner in the county's Department of Regional Planning, said it has become problematic because the Federal Communications Commission requires government agencies to approve or deny them within two months.

"A conditional-use permit in California requires 30-days public notice, a public hearing in front of the commission," Durbin explained. "And to be able to approve that all within 60 days, it's impossible."

Martinez emphasized she worries about possible fire hazards from the wiring in the boxes, and about the health effects of radiofrequency radiation coming from the boxes. Durbin pointed out the county is not allowed to weigh in on the safety of the equipment.

"I'm respectful of those concerns about the RF output," Durbin acknowledged. "But the fact is, the FCC forbids local agencies from considering those impacts. The thinking is that FCC has tested this equipment, and it complies with federal standards, and it has no place in the land-use regulation."

The wireless industry's trade association, the CTIA, did not respond by deadline but has argued for years that inconsistent, time-consuming rules for siting small-cell boxes is slowing the spread of high-speed internet.

W. Scott McCollough, an attorney who consults on telecom issues and works with FiberFirstLA, noted the wireless industry has supported similar fast-track ordinances all across the country.

"They find public involvement in their facility placement decision to be bothersome, and they want to get rid of it," McCollough asserted. "The main point is to dispense with notice and hearing and any environmental review. That's what it's all about."

McCollough added fiber-optic cable is much more secure and reliable compared to wireless and already has been laid in wealthier areas. He stressed companies are balking at extending fiber to homes in underserved communities because it's less profitable.

Consumer groups are calling for the withdrawal of a bill that would change the way California's auto lemon law works - before the legislative session ends this week. Assembly Bill 1755's backers say it would reduce delays in getting reimbursed for a defective new car.

Rosemary Shahan, president of Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety, said it would also mean if a problem arises more than six years after the sale, the lemon law no longer applies.

"It would shorten the statute of limitations for filing a lemon-law case to just one year after the warranty expires. Right now it's four years after you find out you have a claim," she explained.

The bill would also require consumers to file a formal written complaint instead of simply calling the dealer. Bill co-author State Senator Tom Umberg said in a statement that the bill "is a necessary step towards streamlining and strengthening California's 'Lemon Law' to get drivers out of the judicial system and back on the road more quickly."

General Motors is the biggest backer of the bill. Shahan suggests car manufacturers are looking for ways to avoid paying to repair or replace vehicles.

"What they're trying to do is reduce their warranty compliance costs, like last year alone, Ford paid out $1.9 billion in warranty repairs, and they're under pressure by Wall Street to reduce their warranty costs," she continued.

She added the bill would also mean that manufacturers would no longer have to pay off the amount people may still owe on a lemon car. So some people may not be able to get a buy-back unless they can come up with thousands of dollars up front.

A controversial Illinois law signed earlier this month has pushed landlords and tenants even further apart.

Gov. JB Pritzker signed the Landlord Retaliation Act, which puts restrictions on landlords. The measure prevents them from terminating leases, increasing rent or threatening a tenant with a lawsuit over disputes. Further restraints include barring them from refusing to renew a lease after a tenant has filed a code violation complaint.

John Bartlett, executive director of the Metropolitan Tenants Organization, supported the measure and views it as another layer of protection for tenants.

"A lot of tenants end up getting retaliated against because they've complained to a governmental agency or requested an inspection because of poor maintenance issues in a building," Bartlett pointed out. "What it does is it creates a presumption, a rebuttable presumption, for eviction court, that a tenant can defend themselves against the eviction."

Bartlett seeks more landlord accountability and believes one solution to curb tenant discrimination and retaliatory behavior is a just cause for eviction law. It permits landlords to evict tenants for any or no reason as long as notice is given before eviction papers are filed in court. Under Illinois law, a landlord must notify a tenant in writing of the intention to terminate a lease. A 30-day notice is required for month-to-month leases, and a 60-day notice for a yearly lease.

Although the Landlord Retaliation Act passed Springfield's House and Senate chambers by nearly 2-1, the legislation has drawn the ire of some landlords.

Paul Arena, director of legislative affairs for the Illinois Rental Property Owners Association, opposed the measure, claiming it prevents landlords from standing up for themselves and creates liability for making ordinary and necessary management decisions such as a rent increase to cover rising costs or a change of property rules or a decision not to renew a lease.

"The way the law is written, if a tenant calls and said, 'My drain is plugged up,' and the landlord comes that very day and unplugs their drain, then the presumption in the law now is that any action the landlord takes for a year following that request is presumed to be in retaliation for having made that request," Parena argued.

He warned the measure could prove to hurt the people it is designed to help the most by decreasing the number of landlords entering the market and higher rents in an already tight housing market.


get more stories like this via email

Housing advocates said they are seeing more Kentuckians affected by electricity shut-offs.

In 2022, the number of Kentuckians who had their power disconnected increased by 228% compared to a 29% increase nationwide, according to data from the Energy and Policy Institute and Center for Biological Diversity.

Cara Cooper, coordinator for Kentuckians for Energy Democracy, said LG&E and KU, one of Kentucky's largest investor owned utilities, ranks among the top twelve worst offenders in the nation when it comes to utility disconnections. She pointed out in some cases, power was shut off for as little as $9 owed in payment.

"Currently, Kentucky is one of only 10 states that has no weather related protections for disconnections," Cooper explained. "That means that disconnection protections are happening at the utility level. That's a problem because it's not one policy across the board for the entire state."

Mountain Association and other Kentucky advocacy groups recently signed onto a petition calling for federal legislation to protect households from utility disconnections during extreme weather. The Preventing Unnecessary Deaths During Life-Threatening Events or PUDDLE Act is similar to House Bill 180, introduced by Kentucky lawmakers twice during legislative sessions.

Sarah Pierce, housing and energy affordability program coordinator for the Metropolitan Housing Coalition, said utility disconnection is tied to housing affordability. She observed people will forego other important bills, groceries or medicine in order to pay their electric bill, or turn to risky methods of heating their home in winter, such as kerosene stoves. For people with young children or the medically vulnerable, power shut-offs can be deadly.

"What we see happening with people who are disconnected during extreme heat or extreme cold, we're seeing a lot of adverse health effects, heat strokes, heat illness," Pierce outlined.

Tomorrow, Metropolitan Housing Coalition and Kentuckians For Energy Democracy are hosting a webinar on utility disconnection protections during extreme weather.


get more stories like this via email