A new survey shows many young people are worried about losing access to birth control.
The survey from the nonprofit Power to Decide found that about seven in 10 young adults think the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, which protected the right to an abortion, will also limit access to birth control. Federal lawmakers have stepped in with the "Right to Contraception Act," which passed in the U.S. House but stalled in the Senate.
Tara Mancini, director of public policy for Power to Decide, said the fate of the bill rests in part with people demanding some action on it.
"If they're interested, they could also ask their senators to bring this to the floor and pass this bill," she said, "which I'm sure the president will sign if it comes to his desk."
In 2018, Tennessee approved the Comprehensive Contraception Act, to provide insurance coverage for birth-control drugs, devices and products approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Mancini added that more funding for the Title X program could help, so more clinics can offer family planning and STI testing services.
In the survey, about half of people ages 18 to 29 said they believe birth control is going to be harder to get in the future. Mancini pointed out that increased funding for Title X could also reduce the number of "contraception deserts," including in parts of Tennessee.
"We know that millions of people in the country already live in areas where there's not reasonable access to the full range of contraceptive birth control methods," she said, "including over 406,000 women in Tennessee."
Mancini added that there's still a stigma associated with birth control, including the myth that it's easy and inexpensive to access, or that one method is best for everyone. She said her group works to ensure that people have access to a wide range of options.
"Another myth is that birth control is just for preventing pregnancy," she said. "Obviously, that's the main reason that people use it, but people use it to help control different health conditions as well. So, that's important - that people also have access to it for whatever reason they need it."
Mancini said she feels hopeful about the future of birth control, since the survey found it is widely accepted across ethnicities and the political divide.
get more stories like this via email
A program in Georgetown, in Williamson County, is working to improve health outcomes for low-income residents by helping them gain access to community and social services.
Community Health Connect works with food banks, social service and health care providers to assist clients with beneficial wraparound services.
Dorothy Light, Community Health Connect director at the United Way for Greater Austin, said the program started almost two years ago.
"The first thing we did was launch what's called the Pathway Community Hub," Light recounted. "It allows us to build a network of community health workers. We're starting with pregnant and postpartum moms."
Light emphasized they hope to eventually expand services to include residents with chronic health conditions or chronic social needs. The program is one of six community sites across the state, funded by the Episcopal Health Foundation, finding local solutions to address nonmedical drivers of health inequity.
The community health workers are the eyes and ears of the HUB and report back valuable information. Light was surprised to learn a majority of the 100 postpartum moms they are working with are food insecure. She noted most of their clients are afraid to take advantage of help from food pantries or other nonprofits.
"They heard from their neighbor that the guy down the street went and got turned away, so they're not even going to try," Light explained. "Or some of our families that have emigrated from other countries are really fearful to use any type of social support."
Light added they recently completed the county's first community needs assessment focusing on food access in Williamson County.
get more stories like this via email
Some emergency medical services, or EMS, are consolidating or closing across Wyoming, while the need for services is increasing. In 2021, Wyoming EMS agencies received about 89,000 calls for service, that's a roughly 27% increase in five years. The law doesn't require EMS services be funded in a community, but a recent AARP survey shows many people think communities should chip in funding.
Tom Lacock, associate state director for communications and state advocacy with AARP Wyoming, said 16 EMS providers have folded or consolidated over the last decade.
"And when you tell folks that you know, EMS is not an essential service, it's not required to be there, they kind of do a double take. " he explained.
73% of Wyomingites think that communities should fund EMS in the same way as police and fire departments, according to the survey. A 2022 Wyoming Department of Health report shows roughly half of EMS nationwide are delivered through fire departments. Others come via a combination of municipal and county governments, private providers and hospital systems.
After listening sessions, the department's potential recommendations for supporting emergency medical services include creating EMS districts, designating EMS as an essential service, regionalization, education and licensing requirements. Lacock says what he calls the "patchwork" of funding could be strengthened, too.
"The question becomes - what can we do to make perhaps a mix of funding? - Not only to pay for this, you know, as Wyomingites, but also to capture some revenue from folks who come through the state?" he said.
The state doesn't currently contribute to EMS funding. Recent attempts to get grant money and American Rescue Plan funding approved by state legislators and Gov. Mark Gordon both failed.
Disclosure: AARP Wyoming contributes to our fund for reporting on Civic Engagement, Consumer Issues, Health Issues, Senior Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Hundreds of thousands of older Californians will see huge savings on prescription drugs starting in January, according to a new report from AARP.
The Biden administration's Inflation Reduction Act caps prescription drug costs at $2,000 per year for people on Medicare, starting in 2025.
Nina Weiler-Harwell, associate director of advocacy and community engagement for AARP California, said an estimated 271,000 people in the Golden State will hit the out-of-pocket maximum next year.
"Medicare drug plan enrollees nationwide who reach the new out-of-pocket cap will see an average savings of roughly $1,500," said Weiler-Harwell, "or 56% in 2025 for new prescription drugs."
On average, 40% of people on Medicare who reach the cap will save at $1,000 a year. And 12% will see savings of more than $3,000.
Every year from 2025 to 2029, between 3 and 4 million Part D plan enrollees are estimated to benefit from the new out-of-pocket cap.
Weiler-Harwell said the Inflation Reduction Act introduced a number of new policies to cut costs for Americans on Medicare.
"Copays for insulin capped at $35 a month," said Weiler-Harwell. "Vaccines such as shingles and pneumonia are free. The Inflation Reduction Act did allow Medicare to negotiate the price of high-cost prescription drugs. But we won't really start to see that until 2026."
Also thanks to the IRA, drug companies will have to pay a penalty if they raise their prices higher than inflation.
Disclosure: AARP California contributes to our fund for reporting on Health Issues, Senior Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email