After the price of crude oil plummeted to $75 a barrel, which marked the lowest price since December of last year, big oil companies kept consumer gas prices artificially high in Wyoming and around the nation, according to new analysis by Accountable.US.

Chris Marshall, research manager for the group, said instead of passing cost savings down to consumers who have been paying high prices for months, big oil has continued to line the pockets of its wealthy shareholders and executives.

"While prices at the pump have been hurting American families, oil and gas companies are making record-shattering profits," Marshall pointed out. "Just in the first three quarters, 24 companies made $343 billion."

Marshall noted it represents a 126% increase in profits over the same time period last year. In testimony before Congress, oil and gas executives said they are increasing energy output, which should ease demand. Some CEOs put the blame for the sluggish pace of lowering prices at the pump on local retailers the oil companies do not own or control.

After the price of spot crude dropped by 38% compared with the peak price set in June, the average price of gasoline actually went up by 8%, from $3.28 a gallon, to $3.54 a gallon.

Marshall hopes to see political leaders make consumers whole by following Great Britain's lead. It recently imposed a windfall profits tax on oil and gas companies.

"An important piece of that is accountability for the oil and gas industry," Marshall argued. "I think a windfall profits tax would be badly needed if we hope to stop the blatant price gouging of American consumers from the biggest oil and gas companies."

Marshall noted in addition to monitoring the price of crude and retail gas prices, his group also monitors SEC-mandated earnings calls of top oil and gas companies. He added across the board, CEOs have been boasting about record profits linked to high gas prices, and investors continue to push for distributions.

In the first nine months of this year, 21 oil and gas companies gave more than $107 billion to shareholders through dividend payouts and stock buybacks.

Indiana lawmakers have approved a measure to study ways to use advanced transmission technologies to squeeze more energy from the state's aging electrical grid.

The technology is a suite of hardware and software which can boost the capacity of current transmission lines and perhaps postpone the need for new infrastructure. Backers of the plan said because it is deployed on existing towers, it can reduce cost, modernize without new construction and increase the system's energy capacity.

Sen. Eric Koch, R-Bedford, a co-sponsor of the bipartisan bill, said the state faces an ever-increasing demand for energy.

"We're hearing projections of a single data center using one or maybe even two gigawatts," Koch pointed out. "A gigawatt is about the size of the consumption of residential use in the city of Indianapolis. It is a large amount of electricity being projected to be needed."

Colorado, Maine and Utah are among the states to have already deploying the system and are studying its effectiveness. Senate Bill 422, signed last week by Gov. Mike Braun, was backed by a variety of groups, including AARP Indiana, the Hoosier Environmental Council and The Pew Charitable Trusts.

Current customers and future demand for new technologies drive the need for more energy.

Carter Harms, state campaigns officer for the Pew Charitable Trusts, said the list is growing.

"Increased domestic manufacturing, increased needs from data centers, partially due to artificial intelligence, and then also increased electrification," Harms outlined. "Because of that growing demand, we're seeing strain on the electric grid."

Koch added one of Indiana's power utilities tested the system and obtained positive results.

"We did have the benefit of one of our five investor-owned utilities here in Indiana, AES, pilot a type of ATT called Dynamic Line Ratings," Koch noted. "The results were favorable, and that gave us some confidence that the 'juice is going to be worth the squeeze.'"

Support for this reporting was provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts.

Oregon ranked ninth this year on The State Energy Efficiency Scorecard. The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, a nonprofit research organization, ranked states based on their latest policy developments and efforts to save energy.

This year's scorecard highlighted Oregon's performance standard for large commercial buildings and efforts to upgrade existing buildings.

Jennifer Kalez, communications director for the Oregon Department of Energy, said even though the state's energy demands continue to increase with the population, Oregon's per capita energy consumption is down.

"While we may have more people in our state, we're using less energy per person thanks to efficiency and conservation efforts," Kalez explained.

Oregon also scored points for zero-emission vehicle policies, including EV rebates and emissions standards. Energy Trust of Oregon, a nonprofit helping people save energy by making their homes more efficient, was recognized in the scorecard for promoting equity.

Julianne Thacher, communications and marketing lead for the Energy Trust of Oregon, said they are designing programs to meet the needs of utility households in rural areas, those with low and moderate incomes, communities of color and small businesses.

"For the state to save more energy going forward and meet its climate goals, we need everyone to be able to directly participate in our programs and benefit and lower energy bills," Thacher contended.

The Trump administration has paused key Biden-era funding, including the Inflation Reduction Act, which supports investments in energy efficiency, clean energy and electric vehicle manufacturing. Kalez noted for now, Oregon's federal funding is still available, and federal energy efficiency programs will continue despite the uncertainty.

Appalachian communities in Kentucky are poised to become manufacturing hubs for the wind energy industry, experts say.

The region's workforce, accessible transportation routes, and stash of coal ash deposits -- which contain rare earth metals needed for turbine production -- all point to a role for Appalachia in the industry's supply chain.

Larry Holloway, professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Kentucky, said wind energy is a quickly growing industry in America. He pointed out more than 11% of all power produced in the U.S. comes from wind turbines and the number grows by 2% each year.

"Wind is pretty inexpensive," Holloway explained. "It depends in part on where in the country you are, how much wind you have and so forth, but it is one of the lowest cost energy sources. And in 2024, several months in a row, wind outproduced coal nationally."

According to federal data, the American wind energy industry currently supports more than 120,000 jobs and the number of wind turbine technicians is expected to grow by 60% over the next decade.

Critics have argued wind power comes with expensive production and maintenance costs, and long-term environmental impacts.

Mike Shields, senior economist for ReImagine Appalachia, said to help with the transition to wind-based power, decommissioned coal power plants could be repurposed as manufacturing facilities for parts used in wind turbines.

"We know that wind turbines are major infrastructure and there are a lot of working parts in those," Shields emphasized. "How our communities can participate in that supply chain is really the key thing that we want to take a look at."

While it remains unclear how tariffs will affect the nation's ability to develop more wind turbine parts, Holloway stressed U.S. based manufacturing is strong.

"There are a number of final assembly lines and parts that are already made in the U.S.," Holloway underscored. "We may, in fact, see even more demand in that area coming in the future as well."

According to a 2024 Pew Research Center survey, 33% of Americans think a wind turbine farm would positively affect their local economy, while 9% said wind turbines would hurt it. Another 27% said installing a wind turbine farm would make no difference.