A recent survey offers insight into the challenges with hunger many Nevada families are facing on a daily basis.

The "Feeding Our Community" survey from the Food Bank of Northern Nevada found about half of its clients sometimes have to choose between food and transportation. One in three chooses between paying for food or medical bills.

Nicole Lamboley, president and CEO of the Food Bank of Northern Nevada, said the yearlong study is done in partnership with the University of Nevada, Reno, and underscores the many "impossible choices" leading Nevada households to become food-insecure.

"Sixty-five percent of the people surveyed had a household income of less than $20,000 annually," Lamboley reported. "That is significant. So that means, you know, they are making those tough choices."

The data showed 72% of those surveyed rent or own their own place with 26% paying a mortgage. It was collected from March 2021 through March 2022.

Because of the time frame, survey administrators realized it would be important to address whether and how the pandemic played a role. According to Lamboley, almost 30% of those surveyed said they started using a food pantry as a direct result of the pandemic.

She noted not only has demand for emergency food gone up, but half of the participants reported buying fewer healthy food options due to lower costs.

"When people have to make tough choices, they choose unhealthy food options," Lamboley observed. "Oftentimes they go with what is not best. Fresh fruit and vegetables are sometimes out of reach for people."

Lamboley added they are currently serving more than 130,000 people per month, which is a record for the organization. Their service area encompasses 90,000 square miles of Northern Nevada and into California's Eastern Sierra region.

The city of Cleveland, Ohio, has joined a global pact to improve urban food systems. Officials say the step builds on efforts to assess food access and policy in the region.

Cleveland recently completed its first Food Policy Landscape and Audit, a citywide review of food-related programs and policies.

Zainab Pixler, local food system strategies coordinator at the city's Department of Public Health, said the move is part of a broader strategy to better understand and shape the local food system.

"Cleveland has been at the forefront of food-systems development for quite some time," she said, "but now we're really taking a holistic view - looking at how it impacts our local economy, how it impacts public health, also take ownership over their food system and promote food sovereignty here in Cleveland."

Cleveland joins Columbus and Cincinnati as Ohio cities that are now part of the Milan Urban Food Policy Pact, which includes more than 300 cities worldwide. The organization emphasizes six food-related areas: governance, nutrition, equity, production, distribution and waste.

City leaders have said joining the pact not only reflects Cleveland's values but boosts its visibility on a global scale. City public information officer Richard Stewart said the pact provides a framework for collaboration and shared learning across cities.

"For Cleveland to join a progressive movement such as this says that we're serious about improving the health and nutrition of our residents," Stewart explained. "It just puts us in a different echelon when it comes to best practices."

He said the city plans to release a deeper analysis next month with recommendations to guide local policy decisions around food access, distribution and sustainability and hopes its work will inspire similar strategies in other communities, in Ohio and beyond.

This story was produced in association with Media in the Public Interest and funded in part by the George Gund Foundation.


get more stories like this via email

Grocery stores serving rural settings are seen as the lifeblood of their communities. But concerns about them closing haven't gone away. Nearly a decade in, Minnesota is providing grants to keep more from disappearing. Through the University of Minnesota Extension, the Regional Sustainable Development Partnerships initiative helps these smaller outlets navigate resources.

Since 2017, loans and grants have been available to cover equipment costs and other needs. On the western edge of the state, Bonnie's Hometown Grocery has used state aid to replace refrigerators and pay for roof repairs. Without that support, owner Bonnie Maas doubts they'd still be serving customers.

"We still have a lot of elderly clientele that come up there, and they really have nice access to good food," she explained. "We will deliver if they need it."

She said they continue to work around challenges, pointing out that rising food costs and the popularity of online shopping will keep the pressure up on these independent stores. According to Hunger Solutions, 235,000 Minnesotans live more than ten miles away from a large grocery store or supermarket.

Kathy Draeger, statewide director, University of Minnesota Extension Regional Sustainable Development Partnerships, said the proliferation of discount stores is another obstacle for smaller grocery stores. Ownership transitions are, too.

"Just like we see an aging population in farmers, we're seeing aging population in rural grocery store owners," she said.

Maas says in her town of Clinton and its population of nearly 400, the grocery store is a place to maintain social connections while stocking up on food.

"It's like the hub of the community, especially Sundays after church," she jested.


get more stories like this via email

As Colorado moves to bar Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants from using benefits to buy soda and other sugar sweetened beverages, a new report spotlights how restrictions on benefits actually harm people the program is meant to help.

Joel McClurg, executive director of systems for Colorado Blueprint to End Hunger, said restricting what people can or can't purchase with SNAP dollars deepens existing racial and economic inequality.

He said it also opens the door for policymakers to cut already low benefits.

"Now since you can only purchase a fraction of that, can't we have benefits at a much lower level? Which is $6 a day on average right now, it's not a lot," said McClurg. "So, decreasing that would have very negative implications for people on the program."

Improving public health by eating better is central to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s "Make America Healthy Again" agenda.

Colorado joins Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana and West Virginia in applying for a U.S. Department of Agriculture waiver to allow restrictions on items such as candy, soda and foods considered unhealthy.

Colorado's waiver won't restrict food items, and would allow participants -- many of whom can't access a kitchen -- to purchase prepared foods.

McClurg said SNAP participants eat the same kinds of foods, including junk foods and soda, as nonparticipants. The main reason SNAP families can't eat better is because they can't afford it.

McClurg pointed to a successful rebate pilot that boosted fresh produce intake for SNAP families by more than 25%.

"If you really want to change what people are consuming and make diets more healthy," said McClurg, "then you need to look at the data that show that by creating these additional incentives for these foods that cost more -- healthy produce and lean proteins -- that's really how you are going to move the needle."

McClurg said restrictions on SNAP purchases won't solve the nation's food system shortfalls, including food deserts in low income neighborhoods, and transportation challenges for rural families.

"You can't just magically manifest healthier foods in your local corner store," said McClurg, "or have a box of fresh foods show up on somebody's doorstep when they live 60 miles away from the nearest grocery store in rural Colorado."