Some older patients with diabetes are now getting easier access to insulin. But there is concern many younger ones are still navigating a difficult path in managing their situation, including an outspoken Wisconsin health care worker.
The average cost of insulin nearly tripled between 2002 and 2013, according to The American Diabetes Association. It prompted outrage following stories of patients being forced to ration their supply of the drug. Last year's federal Inflation Reduction Act capped monthly copays at $35 for Medicare recipients.
Saskia Hale, a registered nurse in Stevens Point, said she is relieved those individuals are less likely to need hospitalization for diabetes complications.
"Some of these complications include having limbs amputated, having sores, having chronic kidney problems, going into kidney failure," Hale said.
She said those often stem from patients not being able to cover out-of-pocket insulin costs. A new federal Health and Human Services report suggests the cap will save seniors $500 a year. But Hale, who is a diabetic herself, said non-Medicare patients still have insurance barriers, along with added expenses for supplies like needles and glucose monitors.
Hale said falling off a management plan because of skyrocketing insulin costs can result in being labeled "noncompliant" by your insurance coverage provider.
"When they're labeled that way, it makes it seem as though they are doing this simply because they don't want to take their insulin and that is usually not the case," she said. "It's usually because they cannot afford the medication."
She added being labeled noncompliant, even if it's not the patient's fault, can lead to the insurer dropping insulin coverage from the individual's plan. President Joe Biden recently called on Congress to extend the $35 cap to all Americans with diabetes. But political analysts predict it is unlikely, with a divided power structure right now. There is some bipartisan support, but some Republicans say it would be a mandate, hindering competition.
get more stories like this via email
The Iowa Legislature's powerful Ways and Means Committee has advanced a measure to eliminate the state income tax. The move is the latest in a series of votes to reduce taxes in Iowa.
Senate Study Bill 1126 would lower Iowa's income-tax rate to flat 2.5% in five years.
Then in 2030, the income tax would be eliminated completely. This comes just after Iowa passed a 3.9% flat tax last year.
Executive Director of nonprofit, nonpartisan Common Good Iowa Anne Discher said - given that the state income tax accounts for 50% of the Iowa's budget - eliminating it would decimate crucial public services.
"State aid to public schools is 43% of our state budget," said Discher. "We could entirely eliminate state aid for our entire public school system and it wouldn't be enough to cover the kind of income tax cuts that we're talking about. So, the kinds of service cuts really would be draconian."
Republicans have said this bill, and the flat tax signed into law last year, are designed to give Iowans broad tax relief and also make the state attractive to businesses that may be considering locating in Iowa.
Discher pointed out that Iowa is already facing a revenue shortfall due to last year's tax cut.
She added that eliminating the income tax revenue would affect mental health, safety and other social service programs in Iowa. But she warned that it could have other consequences, too.
"It is certainly a shot across the bow against racial equity, as well," said Discher. "We are further advantaging the wealthiest Iowans - further advantaging, as a group, white Iowans. Iowans of color are over-represented at the lower end of the income distribution, because of longstanding discrimination in housing, education and employment."
The bill moves next to the full Senate.
get more stories like this via email
Critics of a proposed pay raise for state workers said it barely keeps up with inflation and is not enough to alleviate Kentucky's long-standing government workforce crisis.
House Bill 444 would use $89 million for a 6% raise, despite having $200 million already set aside.
Dustin Pugel, executive director of the Kentucky Center for Economic Policy, explained over the past two decades, the state's public workforce has shrunk, despite a growing population and increasing demand for public services.
"We've heard the last couple of sessions, horror stories really from people and child welfare and public defenders about how their caseloads have ballooned," Pugel reported. "That just creates a vicious cycle; when people are overworked and underpaid, they leave."
Last year the General Assembly passed an 8% across the board increase for state workers, and funneled extra cash to social workers, family support staff, public defenders, and the state police. Pugel pointed out while any raise is better than none, the legislation would still leave state workers making far less in inflation-adjusted dollars than they were in 2011.
Nationwide, pay increases for state and local government employees haven't kept pace with inflation or those of private workers, according to an analysis by the Pew Research Center.
Pugel noted a few years ago, when residents called local agencies for assistance with SNAP benefits, Medicaid, or unemployment insurance benefits, they spent hours waiting on the phone.
"Even now, when you call the department for community based services, you're likely to be on hold for 20, 30, 40 minutes before someone picks up the phone," Pugel observed. "About a third of folks who call in just end up hanging up before anyone helps them."
According to the Kentucky Center for Economic Policy, even with last year's raise, state government vacancies remain high.
Disclosure: The Kentucky Center for Economic Policy contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy and Priorities, Criminal Justice, Education, and Hunger/Food/Nutrition. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Florida's legislative session - which begins Tuesday - has already made headlines as a conservative majority pitches bills to expand gun rights, ban diversity programs, make it easier to sue the news media, and further restrict abortions.
One coalition says this isn't what everyday Floridians are asking for.
Ruth Moreno, deputy director of the statewide group "Florida for All," said the average person is looking for the opposite of what's about to happen in Tallahassee.
Moreno said she also wants Gov. Ron DeSantis and legislative leaders to end what she sees as a corporate-driven agenda that benefits the wealthy.
"We cannot get away with not paying our taxes in Florida, yet corporations in the state of Florida do all the time, right?" said Moreno. "And they don't pay their dues. So, with the People's Budget, it's asking the question. It's offering a platform for everyday Floridians."
Lawmakers are preparing to advance bills that would require private companies to check their employees' immigration status, along with sweeping changes to limit lawsuits against businesses.
Moreno's group and others planned a virtual news conference today at 11 a.m. - to highlight their demands for "a government that works for the people."
The groups are calling for solutions to rising housing costs. And Moreno said they want to see an end to political interference in schools and universities, and criminal justice reform, to name a few priorities.
"The culture wars, the anti-protest bill" said Moreno, "these are things that are not real issues for people, right? The real issues that are impacting folks are, 'Is the school that my child's going to well-funded?'"
The prospect of lawmakers curtailing their current agenda is slim during the annual session, which runs for 60 days.
With a Republican supermajority, lawmakers have so far given every indication that they'll grant the governor's wishes, to give him a broader platform for his expected 2024 presidential campaign.
get more stories like this via email