A decadelong effort to secure protections for New Mexico's last remaining free-flowing rivers and tributary systems has been introduced in Congress for the third time.

A diverse coalition of residents traveled to Washington, D.C., to support reintroduction of the M.H. Dutch Salmon Greater Gila Wild and Scenic River Act by the state's Congressional delegation.

John Harned, a wilderness guide from Grant County, lent his support, hoping to prevent future dams from being built on the Gila and San Francisco rivers. He believes New Mexico can sustain both free-flowing rivers and a vital economy.

"How many rivers do we have left that are flowing that have the kind of diversity -- the kind of resources -- that we see along the Gila River? There are not many of them," Harned pointed out

The bill was first introduced in May 2020 but stalled in the last Congress. It proposes to designate nearly 450 miles of the Gila and San Francisco as Wild and Scenic under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The Heritage Waters Coalition opposes the designation, arguing it would hurt the area's industry.

Lori Gooday Ware, chairwoman of the Fort Sill Apache Tribe, said the legislation is needed to ensure traditional and current use of the waterways, and protect critical wildlife habitat. She wants her grandchildren to experience the rivers the way their Indigenous ancestors did.

"People tend to go there and do their vacations and take their kids there, but it needs to be conserved the way it is, that way it will be the same way 150 years from now," Gooday Ware contended.

Outdoor recreation along pristine waterways is an economic driver for communities in southwestern New Mexico and Harned worries without protections, development will spoil the rivers.

"Is that really what we want for the Gila River? Do we want it to be developed?" Harned asked. "It's such an amazingly special place. I think it has more value as it is."

The Gila was inaugurated as America's first wilderness in 1924. Outdoor recreation employs nearly 100,000 people in New Mexico and generates nearly $10 billion in annual consumer spending.

Support for this reporting was provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts.

Indigenous water protectors and allies met at Michigan's Straits of Mackinac last week, to spotlight the dangers of the 71-year-old Line 5, deemed North America's riskiest crude oil pipeline.

Headlined by the nonprofit Oil and Water Don't Mix, the protests featured two main events: The "Pipe Out Paddle Up" in St. Ignace which showcased a flotilla against Enbridge's Line Five oil spill risk, followed by the "Water is Life Festival" in Petoskey, celebrating local music and advocacy for ending Line Five's threat.

Nichole Keway Biber, Michigan organizer for Clean Water Action, a member of the Oil and Water Don't Mix coalition, explained Indigenous people have been given stewardship over the waters.

"Also really critical to us having lived relationship to our culture and what our teachings are and our instructions are," Keway Biber explained. "So much of that is to protect and oversee the water and the wildlife."

Keway Biber emphasized the events focused on the preservation of the Indigenous way of life. Enbridge has maintained Line Five's safety is exclusively regulated by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.

Keway Biber noted there are many individuals, both from Michigan and beyond, who treasure and deeply value the Great Lakes but remain unaware of the significant threats posed by Line Five.

"They may not know we're constantly just a moment away from this catastrophic kind of ruination of those precious fresh waters," Keway Biber stressed. "It's powerful for them to first and foremost here about it from people who are committed to protecting the water and the people and the wildlife."

Enbridge moves up to 540,000 barrels of light crude oil, light synthetic crude oil and liquefied natural gas through Line Five.

The Biden Administration issued an executive order in 2022 to strengthen and protect America's forests and old-growth trees.

Old-growth trees have grown and survived beyond the traditional age of harvest.

The Sierra Club and other environmental groups are pushing for more clarity from federal agencies on their strategy for protecting old-growth forests.

Illinois Environmental Council Conservation Director Lindsey Keeney said those agencies manage forests with various goals in mind.

"We trust our evidence-based science partners to decide what sort of management practices make sense within each of these forested areas," said Keeney. "Whether that is removing diseased trees through logging, using prescribed fire as an invasive species treatment, or other conservation practices, to manage those forests."

The council acknowledges that forest stewardship practices are so fragmented that invasive species encroach on the trees.

The agency says the best way to help preserve old-growth trees is through logging and other forms of restoration to keep these threats in check.

A new Sierra Club report says research confirms mature trees reduce carbon emissions - but also remain at risk for wildfires, disease, climate change, and invasive species.

Keeney said forested sands in Illinois do a great job capturing and holding carbon.

Many local economies thrive, she acknowledged, because of forest management activities - including in the sustainable forest product sector.

"We are the Prairie State, but we are definitely a forested state too," said Keeney. "Even up in Chicago, the Forest Preserve systems have really healthy forests. Downstate all the way through Central Illinois, we have forests that are protected by our land trust organizations. And then we have the Shawnee National Forest down at the bottom third of our state."

A U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service analysis reports Illinois has nearly 4,900,000 acres of forestland.

It says wildfires disturb 3,700 acres of forestland in Illinois every year. And weather impacts nearly 8,500 acres of forestland in the state.




get more stories like this via email

Climate and environmental activists along the Texas Coast are celebrating after receiving favorable news from an insurance company covering liquefied natural gas terminals.

Melanie Oldham, director of the group Better Brazoria Clean Air and Water, said after a meeting with members of their front line community, Chubb Insurance denied coverage for the expansion of one project and they are hopeful the same will be true for a planned plant expansion in Freeport.

"They said keep track of all the operational problems of Freeport LNG and we will keep looking at them," Oldham explained. "And we're hoping Chubb takes the lead and stops insuring these LNG's."

The plant in Freeport is the second-largest in the United States. It was shut down for several months in 2022 following an explosion, which federal investigators said was caused by inadequate operating and testing procedures, human error and fatigue.

Oldham lives about four miles from the Freeport plant and multiple petrochemical companies. Two oil export projects are also proposed for the area. She pointed out the community of around 13,000 people suffers from many illnesses due to the hazardous chemicals released from the plants.

"We have 65% Hispanic, Black, White, Asian; very low-income community," Oldham noted. "I'm a health care professional, I helped Texas Department of State Health do a cancer cluster study here in 2018. We have eight types of cancers higher than to be expected. COPD, it just goes on and on."

Oldham and others said further permitting of oil and gas infrastructure on the Gulf Coast would quadruple gas exports and likely cause hurricanes to hit the region even harder and they are calling on the Biden administration to permanently ban such facilities.


get more stories like this via email