The Iowa Legislature's powerful Ways and Means Committee has advanced a measure to eliminate the state income tax. The move is the latest in a series of votes to reduce taxes in Iowa.
Senate Study Bill 1126 would lower Iowa's income-tax rate to flat 2.5% in five years.
Then in 2030, the income tax would be eliminated completely. This comes just after Iowa passed a 3.9% flat tax last year.
Executive Director of nonprofit, nonpartisan Common Good Iowa Anne Discher said - given that the state income tax accounts for 50% of the Iowa's budget - eliminating it would decimate crucial public services.
"State aid to public schools is 43% of our state budget," said Discher. "We could entirely eliminate state aid for our entire public school system and it wouldn't be enough to cover the kind of income tax cuts that we're talking about. So, the kinds of service cuts really would be draconian."
Republicans have said this bill, and the flat tax signed into law last year, are designed to give Iowans broad tax relief and also make the state attractive to businesses that may be considering locating in Iowa.
Discher pointed out that Iowa is already facing a revenue shortfall due to last year's tax cut.
She added that eliminating the income tax revenue would affect mental health, safety and other social service programs in Iowa. But she warned that it could have other consequences, too.
"It is certainly a shot across the bow against racial equity, as well," said Discher. "We are further advantaging the wealthiest Iowans - further advantaging, as a group, white Iowans. Iowans of color are over-represented at the lower end of the income distribution, because of longstanding discrimination in housing, education and employment."
The bill moves next to the full Senate.
get more stories like this via email
A new report brands Connecticut's tax system as "regressive" for low- to middle-income residents and uses a report from the state to make its point.
The Connecticut Voices for Children report reviewed the state's Tax Incidence Study, in which one of the biggest findings is how property taxes contribute to a regressive system. Because a town's mill rate does not adjust based on a tax filer's income, low- to middle-income residents spend more on housing as a percentage of their budget than those with higher incomes.
Patrick O'Brien, research and policy director of Connecticut Voices for Children and the report's author, pointed out Connecticut could have a more fair tax system by implementing a few policy changes.
"One, eliminate and/or close the state's tax gap, which was shown likely primarily benefits high-income and wealthy tax filers. Two, eliminate and/or reduce regressive tax expenditures. And three, possibly increase personal income tax rates on high-income and wealthy tax filers," O'Brien outlined.
He argued the new revenue could then be used to provide tax cuts for lower and middle-income households, and could help with creating a state-level child tax credit. One thing to note is the state's report was based on data from 2020.
O'Brien acknowledged the state has made changes to its tax system since then but the Connecticut Voices for Children report showed despite the new cuts, the tax system is still regressive.
The report detailed the effects of the state tax system beyond its residents. Connecticut has only recently come in second behind Massachusetts for income inequality.
O'Brien emphasized it is only exacerbated by the regressive tax system.
"This is really hurting the economic well-being of the state's low- and middle-income tax filers, and that, in turn, ultimately ends up hurting economic growth in the state as well," O'Brien contended. "It can have multiple effects that we're trying to address."
The report recommended creating a task force to ensure all future reports from the Department of Revenue Services have all the required information to get a thorough picture of the state tax system. The most recent report faced criticism for lacking some data.
Disclosure: Connecticut Voices for Children contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Children's Issues, Education, and Juvenile Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
While three initiatives received the go-ahead to appear on Washington's November ballot at the end the legislative session last week, three that have already been approved could also have a big impact on the state.
These measures could have an especially big effect on funding in the state. Executive director of Fuse Washington, Aaron Ostrom, said they also have a few more things in common.
"They're all funded by the same Republican mega donor, Brian Heywood, and all sponsored by the MAGA Republican Party Chair Jim Walsh," said Ostrom. "The second thing about them is that all three are deliberately deceptive and misleading. And then the third thing about these three is they all seek to cut billions of dollars in funding for critical public priorities."
The initiatives would repeal the state's capital gains tax, undo the Climate Commitment Act, and would make optional the WA Cares program - which helps people save for long-term care.
Heywood says he's backing these measures because no one in the state is challenging Democrats on taxes and other policies.
Ostrom said the initiative that would repeal the capital gains tax for profits of more than $250,000 - which fewer than 4,000 people paid last year - would leave a big hole in the state's budget, costing nearly $900 million a year.
"Initiative 2109 would repeal the capital gains tax," said Ostrom, "which would take billions of dollars in funding from child care and schools to give a tax cut to Washington's wealthiest."
Supporters of I-2109 say it is essentially an income tax, which is barred in the Washington state constitution. However, the state Supreme Court upheld the tax as constitutional in a ruling last year.
Ostrom said he believes all three initiatives are a threat to the state.
"These three initiatives would devastate funding for our kids and schools," said Ostrom. "They would dismantle our protections against air and water pollution, and they repeal efforts to care for our seniors."
Disclosure: Fuse Washington contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Health Issues, Human Rights/Racial Justice, Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Virginia child advocates are calling on state lawmakers to improve school funding.
The concern grew when several bills focused on building up school mental health failed in their respective General Assembly committees. The state is ranked 48th for youth mental health by Mental Health America.
Cat Atkinson, mental health policy analyst at Voices for Virginia's Children, said given the ongoing youth mental health crisis, now is the time for action.
"Having mental health professionals in our schools creates a space where, one, our young people are able to be where they're comfortable," Atkinson recommended. "They have built relationships with staff and are able to be in their schools, and to be able to have their needs met in a place where they are consistently."
The mental health staff funding bills failed or were continued to the 2025 session due to high costs. Combined, the bills would have called for around $120 million to be spent in the 2025 and 2026 budgets.
Beyond money, a long-term workforce shortage is depriving schools of having proper mental health staff. A KFF report found 48% of schools nationally have insufficient access to licensed mental health professionals.
The funding inconsistencies affect more than just mental-health services. A 2023 report found not only are school divisions getting less funding than most other states, but Virginia is still using the Great Recession as a benchmark for cost-reduction measures.
Atkinson pointed out a lack of funding affects not just schools.
"The trickle-down effect of our state underfunding public schools places a burden on the local communities," Atkinson argued. "Which leaves the quality of our young people's education to depend entirely on the neighborhoods they reside in."
She added the current situation is not equitable because community resources across regions vary significantly, but noted there are other ways to get mental health care in schools.
In 2023, the General Assembly passed Senate Bill 1300, which requires teachers to get trauma-informed care training every three years. Gov. Glenn Youngkin's Right Help, Right Now plan would also bolster school and community mental health needs.
get more stories like this via email