Early data show young voters were a driving force in last week's Wisconsin Supreme Court election, and civic engagement groups said they are not done with outreach efforts, suggesting younger generations are ready to be vocal about a range of issues.
The outcome of the judicial race means the balance of the state's high court will favor liberals. Matters such as abortion access were considered key factors in the election.
Cendi Tena, co-executive director of the multiracial group Leaders Igniting Transformation, said they knocked on 60,000 doors in Milwaukee, as well as La Crosse, which is home to a University of Wisconsin campus.
"We also focused on ZIP codes that have the highest amount of young voters but the lowest amount of voter turnout," Tena recounted. "Understanding that those people are often the ones that are closest to the issues that we're working on, and most organizations aren't reaching out to them."
Tena noted abortion access and fair election maps consistently came up during their canvassing. She pointed out that similar to other generations, issues such as cost of living are a big concern among young voters.
Meanwhile, the group NextGen America cited as an example of higher turnout was a polling location for University of Wisconsin-Madison freshmen, going from 44 votes cast in 2019, to more than 500 this year.
Tena emphasized while her group engages with young voters on certain issues, they are nonpartisan and do not endorse candidates. Instead, they work year-round to ensure high school and college-age students are aware of what is happening for all levels of government.
"We don't just focus on major elections like the presidential or gubernatorial, but also school board races," Tena observed. "Understanding that local elected officials also have a lot of power in what happens in our schools and neighborhoods."
Tena stressed younger generations are not tuning out broader political events happening around them, pointing to the response to the expulsion of two Black lawmakers in the Tennessee Legislature. She argued they are being inspired to act.
"These are the same people who have lived through so much trauma and many tragedies as well, so I don't think that this is something that's going to scare them away," Tena contended.
Support for this reporting was provided by The Carnegie Corporation of New York.
get more stories like this via email
Community groups are coming together to expand voting rights to all Connecticut residents.
The Connecticut Right to Vote Campaign says it aims to ensure all lawful permanent residents would be able to vote, as well as encourage them to turn out for local, state and federal elections.
The campaign's centerpiece is HJ 26, a bill that would allow lawful permanent residents to vote.
Helen Quinonez, a community organizer with Make the Road Connecticut, said the campaign and bill have widespread support.
"We don't have only the support from the community who are not able to vote now; we have the support from the community who actually can vote," she said. "But we need to increase the vote participation in Connecticut, because a lot of people don't go to vote in local, municipal elections."
Despite support for the campaign and the bill, Quinonez acknowledged it may take five years to accomplish their goals, given the current political climate. As President Donald Trump continues to support mass deportations, groups working for immigrants' rights want Connecticut lawmakers to bolster state immigration laws to better protect residents.
A crux of the campaign will center on using voting rights in local and municipal elections. State data show declines in voter turnout across local and federal elections.
Ariana Fernandez, a community organizer with United Parents and Students, said educating people about voting will be a big part of their efforts - helping them understand the importance in their own lives of being able to vote.
"The biggest way to have a voice in their child's education is through a vote and deciding who represents whatever education matters that affect their children," she said. "So, as an example, the Board of Education - and we know during these local elections, there's a lot of parents who are left out of that voting process."
She pointed out if people who live and work in the state can't vote, it's a form of taxation without representation. It's estimated that immigrants in Connecticut contribute more than $406 million a year in taxes to the state's economy.
get more stories like this via email
Michigan's congressional delegation has "aced" the National Environmental Scorecard, earning a perfect 100% in 2024.
The League of Conservation Voters uses the scorecard to track lawmakers' votes on a range of bills relating to the environment and democracy - from climate change and wildlife conservation to environmental justice.
Sens. Debbie Stabenow and Gary Peters, both D-Mich., scored 100%, with lifetime scores of 91% and 94%, respectively.
Nick Dodge, communications manager for Michigan's League of Conservation Voters, explained why the state consistently stands out on the scorecard.
"Water is pretty much everywhere around here, and people have a true connection to it," he said. "The people that we send to Congress get that and understand that. Anyone that goes to Congress and votes against our water, they can expect to hear that from their constituents."
The national average scores show a stark contrast between parties, with Democrats generally scoring higher than Republicans. The League said it aims to use the scorecard to hold elected officials accountable and inform voters ahead of elections.
The majority of Republican politicians view environmental policies as examples of government overreach, while most Democrats view them as a pressing need for climate action. Dodge expressed concern over the obvious divide.
"We see environmental issues as nonpartisan," he said. "You're talking about clean air to breathe, safe water to drink. To us, those shouldn't be - and are not - partisan issues."
Of Michigan's neighbors, Ohio's delegation scored 25%, Wisconsin's scored 50% and the Indiana delegation got a zero.
The National Environmental Scorecard is updated each year to reflect the most recent congressional votes.
Disclosure: League of Conservation Voters contributes to our fund for reporting. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
An Alabama group is urging lawmakers to simplify the voter restoration process for people who have lost their right to vote. In Alabama, more than 8% of adults, or one in 13 people, are disenfranchised, according to The Sentencing Project.
JaiGregory Clarke, Birmingham organizer with Faith in Action Alabama, warns that the number is likely to increase due to House Bill 100, which expands the list of crimes that can strip voting rights. He said the law bars thousands from the ballot, including people who were previously eligible to vote. His organization is pushing for reforms to ensure that once individuals have served their time, they can fully participate in democracy.
"If someone re-enters the community, if they've served their time and they've paid their debt to society and they're active, meaning they are employed and are paying taxes, then they should absolutely have voting rights or say in the policies that govern our community," Clarke said.
Clarke explained that regaining the right to vote in Alabama is a complicated and costly process. People must complete their sentence, pay all fines, fees and restitution - which can total thousands of dollars - and then apply for a Certificate of Eligibility to Register to Vote, or CERV.
To change that, Clarke said voting-rights advocates are backing Senate Bill 7. If passed, the bill would introduce several major changes to Alabama's voting system. It would allow same-day voter registration, eliminate the need for an excuse to vote absentee, and create a statewide voter database. Clarke believes the bill would make the voting process fairer and more accessible, and added that it would not only streamline the process of restoring voting rights but also expand access to voting across the state.
"What it proposes is a complete overhaul of the way people get their voting rights back in Alabama," Clarke said.
The bill would also establish an Alabama Voting Rights Commission to oversee election changes and require preclearance for certain decisions at the state and local levels - ensuring new policies don't unfairly impact eligible voters. Sponsored by Sen. Kirk Hatcher, D-Montgomery, the legislation is currently awaiting committee action.
Disclosure: Faith in Action Alabama contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Civic Engagement, Gun Violence Prevention, Health Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email