The population is made up of fewer children - in Pennsylvania and across the United States, according to the latest analysis of census data.

The Annie E. Casey Foundation report said Pennsylvania is one of six states that appears to have lost more than 100,000 children between 2010 and 2020. This shrinks the state's child population by 4%.

Study co-author Bill O'Hare, a demographer for the Casey Foundation, said children made up 22% of the U.S. population in 2020, and it's gone down even more steeply since then. In future years, O'Hare said, this could mean implications for the labor force.

"Entry-level workers are going to be going down, they haven't gone down much since, but they will be over the next 10 years, as older children are replaced by smaller birth cohorts," he said. "As the number of entry-level workers go down, it's going to be harder for employers to find the kind of people they need for jobs."

He added that it's important to make sure every child gets the kind of education, training and opportunities for the types of jobs employers are looking to fill. The 2020 Census counted more than 73 million children nationwide, but that's 1.1 million fewer kids than in the 2010 Census.

O'Hare noted that data show the number of non-Hispanic white children has decreased since 2010, while the populations of children of color has increased. He said that could signal a need for greater investment in these demographic groups that, historically, have faced some educational challenges.

"Particularly Hispanics and Asians and children of two or more races, those groups have been increasing," he said, "and those groups in the past have not always done as well, education-wise as the majority populations."

O'Hare added that with fewer children being born, more money could be spent on each child's education - although fewer kids could signal less support for schools. He pointed out that as the numbers of households and adult voters without children increase, they may be less supportive of public education.

With state lawmakers back in Boise, changes could be coming to Medicaid.

Voters approved Medicaid expansion in 2018, but Republican legislators have consistently said the program is too costly for Idaho. Some are considering repealing the expanded program. However, such radical changes could hurt families the most.

Randi LaSalle, a single mom with four kids on Medicaid, said at one point, she was working two jobs and paying $800 per month for private health insurance, which was more than her rent.

"I stopped working two jobs because it just wasn't feasible with trying to take care of a bunch of kids and bouncing between counties to kind of keep up two jobs," LaSalle explained. "Things are a little tighter, but at least now I don't have to pay for insurance anymore."

Expansion helped cover people who made too much to qualify for Medicaid and fell into a coverage gap. The program covers about one in six adults and three in eight children in Idaho. LaSalle hopes legislators make the program more accessible for families this session.

Randy Johnson, Idaho government relations director for the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, said health coverage is important for preventive care and cancer treatment, and repealing or placing barriers to Medicaid access won't stop people from getting sick.

"People still are going to go to the hospital, and taxpayers are still going to end up covering those costs," Johnson pointed out. "It's just not up-front, and instead of going to their doctor, they're going to have to go to the ER, which is way more expensive."

Johnson argued changes would mean fewer people are covered in Idaho, which would hurt families.

"It creates that coverage for people who are working, who are doing the right thing, who want to make sure that their families are protected," Johnson stressed. "This helps them do that."

Supporters of the health program are holding Idaho Supports Medicaid Day at the Capitol on Jan. 28 in Boise.


get more stories like this via email

Advocates for working families in New York say they want less talk and more action to improve child care in the state.

Gov. Kathy Hochul has proposed a child-care construction fund and a task force to address the issue - which advocates say will make a dent in the child-care shortage, but doesn't do enough.

Estimates show New Yorkers spend a grand total of $14 billion a year on child care, or about $22,000 per year, per child. High child-care costs also are cited as a major reason young families leave the state.

Rebecca Bailin, executive director of New Yorkers United for Childcare, said universal child care is possible if the state will fund plans to implement it.

"That child care would be free, easy to apply, nearby and accessible to all families," she said. "There's no reason, with a budget of $237 billion, she cannot start to implement universal public child care now."

Bailin said a lack of political will has been the biggest hurdle for universal public child care, since 74% of New Yorkers say they want it. Feedback from some state lawmakers is positive, although enacting a universal plan could cost $12 billion a year - 6% of the state's current budget.

A Cornell University poll found high child-care costs are one reason some people can't join the workforce, while other reasons are lack of accessible child care that keeps people from working.

Bailin said a universal public system could counteract these economic harms.

"It's a $10 to $13 return on investment for every dollar spent," she said. "Making New York an affordable place for families will help to stop the exodus of families, make it possible for us to grow our workforce and our tax base."

Although New York offers child-care programs, some families earn too much to qualify for them, or have issues with immigration status that keep parents from reaching out. Bailin said expanding New York's Child Tax Credit and Working Families Tax Credit could help the system, as well as investing in the child-care workforce.


get more stories like this via email

January is National Mentoring Month and in Minnesota, program leaders report waiting lists for kids to be matched up with an adult willing to spend some valuable time with them.

Calls are being renewed for volunteers. Community-based mentoring programs connect youths who do not have many role models in their lives with adults for a range of activities. It could include attending sporting events, museums, or doing arts and crafts together.

Jill Hinners, executive director of Mentor North in Duluth, said it is all about helping children develop new skills and confidence.

"We definitely see kids that are introverts, shy, anxious," Hinners explained. "Where maybe they just have a little bit of difficulty putting themselves out there to form a large network of friends."

She suggested a mentor might put them more at ease in making connections as they grow. Her group pointed to research showing mentored kids are 22% more likely to have felt a strong sense of belonging. Hinners noted even though Minnesota has a good track record for volunteer work, her office reports a waitlist of between 50 and 60 kids.

Other data show kids who have a mentor are 55% more likely to enroll in college and are 78% more likely to volunteer regularly. Hinners stressed the outcomes can be traced back to a sense of belonging.

"We want youths to feel that they are developing their voice," Hinners emphasized. "To be able to make themselves heard in their community and courageous enough to take leadership positions in their community."

Hinners pointed out even though they have a backlog, volunteer levels have rebounded from a pandemic dip. She added they are trying to be more accommodating in certain ways, including making sure kids with disabilities have a good experience.

Adults who want to become mentors are put through a screening process before they are matched with a youth who has similar interests.


get more stories like this via email