South Dakota's ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth is scheduled to go into effect on July 1.
But opponents are looking into what the future holds for the policy after a similar law in Arkansas suffered a legal defeat. This week, a federal judge issued a permanent injunction against the Arkansas law, the first state to ban such care. Earlier this year, South Dakota joined other conservative-led states in adopting their own bans.
Samantha Chapman, advocacy manager for the ACLU of South Dakota, said the court's decision is significant.
"This is officially setting a precedent for laws that have passed across the country," Chapman contended. "Similar to the one here in South Dakota."
Chapman pointed out many of the laws have similar language, due to the coordination of special-interest groups pushing Republican lawmakers to pass them. Opponents of gender-affirming care contend it is too risky for minors, arguing they might regret the decision. But several key medical groups say the care is essential.
The judge said Arkansas' ban violated the constitutional rights of transgender youth, and noted lawmakers who pushed for the passage of Arkansas' law relied on testimony "grounded in ideology and not science." Chapman feels the same can be said for what happened in South Dakota.
"Constituents should be asking their lawmakers why they passed this reckless and costly legislation," Chapman stressed.
She warned the legal bills for Arkansas have piled up since the state has been defending the law in court, noting the same could happen for South Dakota if a lawsuit is filed. The regional ACLU is still reviewing the decision, and said it cannot assess any potential action yet in South Dakota. Meanwhile, Arkansas officials say they plan to file an appeal.
get more stories like this via email
For some LGBTQ+ voters in Nebraska, the state's new voter ID law brought up issues in the May primary election and could again in November's General Election.
Johnny Redd, communications manager for OutNebraska, said the group has used Pride Month to focus on voter registration and what the voter ID law does and does not mean. Redd explained one concern they have heard is, what happens if the person's ID picture does not match their appearance or gender expression?
"There is no requirement that requires you to look like your photo. It just has to be a photo ID," Redd noted. "I mean, obviously, if it's like someone of a different race, or something like that, then there's a problem."
Redd pointed out it is not unusual for people to look different from their photo ID, often because of a different hair color or style, or weight gain or loss. But for those who have changed their name, she stressed the name on their ID and their voter registration must match for them to be eligible to vote.
Redd urged people to make sure their voter registration is up-to-date. At the Secretary of State's Voter Registration Portal, people can register, change their address and even change their name in some cases.
Redd added voter roll purging is another reason people should double-check their registration. She said although it is usually billed as "upkeep," in some cases it may be more targeted.
"Specifically, BIPOC and LGBTQ people end up being a huge number of those folks that are purged from voter rolls, for whatever reason," Redd observed. "That's another big one, just showing up and realizing, 'Wait, I'm not even on the list because I haven't voted since 2017,' or something like that."
Nebraska law requires people who've moved to update their voter registration by the deadline indicated by their county election commissioner or county clerk, or they will be dropped from the voter rolls.
A 2022 study identified members of the LGBTQ+ community and their supporters as one of the fastest growing voting blocs in the country.
Disclosure: OutNebraska contributes to our fund for reporting on LGBTQIA Issues, Reproductive Health, and Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Twenty years after the first state permitted marriage equality, a majority of same-sex married couples said it had a profound positive effect on their lives.
A new report finds it strengthened couples' relationships, provided legal protections, financial security and greater acceptance among family and friends.
Abbie Goldberg, professor of psychology at Clark University, said marriage equality is part of a public health agenda.
"They have access to health insurance. They are physically and mentally healthier. They're able to share the sort of challenges and work of raising children," Goldberg outlined.
Still, Goldberg said nearly 80% of couples surveyed worry about the future of marriage equality. Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas have both suggested the high court revisit Obergefell v. Hodges, the decision which legalized same-sex marriage in 2015.
The report reveals same-sex married couples are also concerned about what they call an increasingly hostile environment in the U.S. More than 500 anti-LGBTQ+ bills have been introduced since last year, including in New Hampshire, where lawmakers have advanced measures targeting transgender youth.
Goldberg noted concerns are forcing couples to consider relocating to more accepting states, or even outside the U.S.
"It's creating not just legal uncertainty but propelling them to think about the future in ways that require time, money, planning," Goldberg explained.
Goldberg added marriage equality created families and the report details the positives to ensuring people are protected. Almost 60% of participants said marriage provided more stability or security for their children, and often created new in-laws who could help.
get more stories like this via email
As Pride Month winds down, health advocates want members of the LGBTQ+ community to know about health care options, despite any challenges to obtaining them.
Nearly 8% of U.S. adults identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or some other sexual orientation besides heterosexual, according to 2023 data, which is more than double the number in 2012.
Despite the increase, the group still faces health care disparities. According to a 2023 survey from the health policy organization KFF, LGBTQ+ people are more likely to self-report poorer health, experience higher rates of disability and have more need for mental health services. Those living in rural places face additional challenges.
Kenny Starling, owner of Wyoming's debut drag and theater production company, said health care can feel like a taboo topic, especially for queer people.
"On top of that, the actual health care providers themselves being up-to-date on the information about queer individuals and the resources that should be available to us," Starling pointed out.
Starling noted it took them four months to find a local doctor willing to work with them to obtain Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis, or PrEP, an HIV preventive Starling's original doctor had not even heard of. According to KFF, nearly half of LGBTQ+ people have reported a negative experience with a health care provider in the last two years, as opposed to one-third of people outside the group. It includes the provider dismissing patient concerns, making assumptions, thinking the patient was lying and more.
Starling emphasized their theater and drag company has been busy during Pride month. The company uses performances to address health care, talking about it during shows and providing resources in the lobby.
"We alternate between the resources," Starling added. "Be they mental health services or free rapid HIV and STD testing, suicide prevention, access to Enroll Wyoming and health insurance resources."
Open enrollment for health insurance begins Nov. 1 in most states but special enrollment periods apply for those experiencing certain life changes.
get more stories like this via email