A new study underscored the urgent need for policies to drive down emissions from U.S. oil and gas production, showing the public health effects are costing billions of dollars.

The research estimated in 2016, in the U.S. alone, oil and gas-related pollution caused $77 billion in health damages, contributing to 7,500 early deaths and more than 400,000 asthma exacerbations. Ohio ranks fifth or sixth among states for pollution-related health concerns.

Peggy Berry, a member of the nonprofit Moms Clean Air Force in Ohio, said there is no question the study points to the need to curb emissions.

"In Ohio, you're selling off portions of the potential oil and gas reserves underneath our public parks," pointed out. "And we want to put that stuff in the air?"

The report is a joint project of the Environmental Defense Fund, Boston University, the University of North Carolina, and the group Physicians, Scientists and Engineers for Healthy Energy. The findings come as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is finalizing tougher regulations on methane emissions from oil and gas production. Supporters of the proposal argued it could deliver significant cuts in emissions, which would curb the related health problems.

The report cited gas production as one of the largest emitters of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Ohio is producing almost 30 times the amount of natural gas as it did in 2010, according to federal figures.

Berry noted Ohio's output is part of a global problem.

"Reducing the air pollution is essential in the entire world," Berry contended. "The other pollutants -- the volatile organic compounds, the methane, the carbon dioxide -- that we humans produce."

The researchers also pointed out the effects of oil and gas pollution extend beyond the regions where the wells are located, to states upwind.

Another report from last fall indicates flaring -- the process of burning off methane at well sites instead of capturing it -- is not as efficient as it needs to be to reduce methane pollution.


get more stories like this via email

A Michigan environmental group is addressing an appeal challenging the state's decision to approve the enclosure of the Enbridge Line 5 pipeline.

Built in 1953, this pipeline transports up to 540,000 barrels of petroleum daily through the Great Lakes.

Enbridge aims to build a protective tunnel around a four mile segment at the Straits of Mackinac, which connects Lake Michigan and Lake Huron.

Environmental groups and tribal leaders want the state to reverse Enbridge's permit, citing concerns about a potential catastrophic oil spill.

The nonprofit group Oil & Water Don't Mix is dedicated to preventing oil spills and promoting clean energy - and they support the appeal.

David Holtz, an international coordinator with the group, discussed the next steps.

"And the next big hurdle that the tunnel will have will be during the federal permitting process," said Holtz, "so we're going to be focusing on that in the coming days."

Enbridge spokesperson Ryan Duffy said in an email statement that Line 5's safety is exclusively regulated by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.

Enbridge maintains that it also conducts internal inspections via an MRI-like tool known as a "pig" that travels the line, recording data on the pipe's thickness and looking for cracks, dents or signs of corrosion.

Holtz said his organization will continue its efforts to make the public and the federal government aware of what needs to be done regarding Line 5.

"The need for the Biden administration," said Holtz, "to take a stand in support of its own climate policy by rejecting the tunnel."

Holtz added that the permitting process, known as the Environmental Impact Study, will be open for public comment - and is set for early next year.

A new report shows New York will have to delay its 2030 climate goals.

The report from the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority showed the state will be a few years off from its climate goals despite a fervent push toward renewables, due to pandemic-era inflation and growing clean energy demand.

Marguerite Wells, executive director of the Alliance for Clean Energy New York, said now is not the time to slow down clean energy development.

"It's very hard to get things built in New York," Wells pointed out. "In the past few years, state agencies and private developers have worked really hard to improve the processes by which projects have to go through and get approvals on all kinds of different fronts, and those processes are mostly prepared now."

The report outlined ways New York can get 70% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030. Part of the involves increasing Tier 1 renewable energy solicitation to 5,600 gigawatt-hours annually. It also calls for allowing flexibility in procuring offshore wind projects, with the chance to get more than 9 gigawatts connected to the grid by 2035.

New York has invested billions in renewable energy projects to accomplish 70% of its goal. But the state is still coming up short 6 years before the goals must be met. Wells believes state lawmakers have to do their part to help the state remain on track. Several climate bills failed during the past legislative session, which she said could have helped homeowners transition to clean energy.

"Things like tax abatements and clean energy financing components, all kinds of stuff; the New York HEAT Act, a number of things," Wells outlined. "Many of those would have had a positive impact on homeowners looking to go green. Almost none of those bills got passed."

Wells hopes the bills get passed and signed into law during the 2025 legislative session. Plenty of other legislation such as the Build Public Renewables Act, the RAPID Act, and the All Electric Building Act ensure the state moves closer to its goals.

By Claire Carlson for The Daily Yonder.
Broadcast version by Trimmel Gomes for Florida News Connection for the Public News Service/Daily Yonder Collaboration

A newly updated wildfire risk map could help level the playing field for rural communities who don't have the resources to conduct their own wildfire risk assessments, according to the independent research group Headwaters Economics.

The map, first created by the U.S. Forest Service under the direction of Congress in 2018, shows wildfire risks at the county level and ways to mitigate those risks. Every U.S. county and tribal area is included in the map.

"With this tool, the data is available for everyone to use, no matter whether you have your own staffing and expertise to produce these kinds of resources or not," said Kelly Pohl, associate director of Headwaters Economics, in a Daily Yonder interview.

Headwaters Economics was brought on as a partner in the mapping project in 2020. The group made the map's new updates by incorporating the latest vegetation and climate data, advancements in wildfire hazard simulation modeling, and the most recent building and housing unit information from the Census Bureau.

Wildfire Risk Is Increasing

Better understanding local wildfire risk could be more important for communities than ever because of the map's recent findings, which shows that about one-third of all Americans live in counties with high wildfire risk.

"There are a lot of states in the East, especially in the Southeast, that have wildfire risk," Pohl said. "And we do see parts of the country have higher wildfire risk than we previously understood." Oregon and Washington are two such states, according to Pohl.

In many parts of the country, climate change has caused hotter temperatures and drier conditions. This exacerbates wildfire risk.

Grant Opportunities

The Biden administration has implemented several grant programs to better equip communities with wildfire resilience tools in light of this increasing risk.

In February 2024, the administration launched a $5 million pilot program for rural emergency response agencies to convert vehicles to wildland fire engines using slip-on water tank units.

In May 2024, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) allocated another $250 million to the Community Wildfire Defense Grant Program that supports communities to develop wildfire protection plans and remove vegetation.

The wildfire risk map's new data underscores the need for the federal government to "continue these efforts through Community Wildfire Defense Grants and our work to increase the pace and scale of hazardous fuels reduction on federal and non-federal lands," according to USDA's Forest Service Chief Randy Moore, who was quoted in a press release.

Information about the grant programs and other funding opportunities can be found on the wildfire risk map's website.


Claire Carlson wrote this article for The Daily Yonder.


get more stories like this via email