A new report found Arizona could save taxpayers $283 million if state and local governments transition their light-duty fleets to electric vehicles over the next decade.
According to the Arizona Public Interest Research Group Education Fund, if the state and its local governments replaced the nearly 20,000 light-duty fleet vehicles which are set to retire over the next decade with EVs, taxpayers would save big.
The move would also help mitigate pollution from gas- and diesel-powered cars and trucks contributing to poor air quality in the state.
Diane Brown, executive director of the Arizona PIRG and co-author of the report, said buying, fueling and maintaining gas- and diesel-fueled fleet vehicles is a "big expense." She argued state and local leaders need to take action independently and collaboratively.
"To accomplish this the state and local governments should develop bold fleet electrification plans," Brown asserted.
Brown recognizes the transition to electric would require "significant" upfront investment, but added incentives such as the Commercial Clean Vehicle Credit, which offers savings of up to $7,500 per light-duty vehicle or $40,000 per heavy-duty vehicle for purchases of EVs by government or private fleets, can help offset costs.
The findings released today follow a report published last October, which examined how 10 of Arizona's largest cities and towns could save a total of approximately $80 billion by replacing their light-duty vehicles with EVs.
Brown pointed out the transition to electric will also help contribute to better air quality and public health outcomes, and added now is the time to commit to the transition.
"By transitioning to electric vehicles, there will be improvements in our air and also for individuals that suffer from asthma or other respiratory issues," Brown contended.
The report stated there are benefits to cooperation for governments and agencies electrifying their fleets and can achieve cost savings by pooling purchases of vehicles and equipment, and advocating for policies to eliminate barriers.
Disclosure: The Arizona Public Interest Research Group Education Fund contributes to our fund for reporting on Civic Engagement, Consumer Issues, Energy Policy, and Urban Planning/Transportation. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Massachusetts will benefit from more than $100 million in new federal funding for various transportation projects.
Neighborhoods divided by busy roadways in Somerville, Mattapan and Pittsfield will be reconnected with new street-level pathways while more than 400 new electric-vehicle charging ports will be installed statewide.
Quentin Palfrey, director of federal funds and infrastructure for the Massachusetts Executive Office for Administration and Finance, said funds will also improve more than 50 high-risk rail crossings.
"Some of these new resources are going to help us to expand rail and transit, move forward West-East rail and also improve the safety of our transit system," Palfrey outlined.
Palfrey noted the goal is to create a more accessible and climate-resilient transit system. The state has secured more than $9 billion in federal funds over the past two years, including nearly $2 billion to replace the Cape Cod Bridges.
The funding stems from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the largest federal investment in public transportation in the nation's history. In addition to upgrading existing structures, projects are also improving access to natural resources.
Palfrey pointed out more than $17 million will support expansion of the Ashuwillticook Trail, creating a network of paths from Adams to Williamstown.
"It's a major priority across our transportation system," Palfrey emphasized. "This is going to be a really big step forward for Berkshire County's efforts in that regard."
Palfrey added state officials are building a transit network to serve everyone no matter how they travel, while helping to meet the state's ambitious climate goal of net-zero emissions by 2050.
get more stories like this via email
A leading consumer publication says electric vehicles are gaining ground on gas-powered cars when it comes to feelings about reliability.
However, an EV enthusiast and Nebraska electrical engineering professor and said there's an information gap, while also highlighting improved technology.
The new reliability survey from Consumer Reports found that EV owners reported 42% more problems than gas-only cars.
That compares to nearly 80% from the previous survey, indicating a major improvement.
Retired University of Nebraska professor Don Cox said the batteries in most EVs are much better than they used to be, potentially easing concerns about them performing in colder climates.
"Batteries have improved a lot over the last 10, 15 years," said Cox. "A huge amount. They are continuing to improve."
However, he said EV batteries will always need a little time to warm up when it's cold, impacting their range in the winter.
Even though that perfection might never be achieved, Cox and other researchers say EVs are proving to be more efficient than gas models, overall.
He said he disagrees with how Consumer Reports puts together its evaluations, and added there isn't enough widely circulated ratings for buyers to lean on.
Dissecting issues such as reliability often coincides with measuring sales of electric vehicles. Cox was one of the first EV owners in Nebraska, which still lags other states for these purchases.
But with the help of federal investments, he said more chargers are being added, including near interstates to accommodate longer trips.
And the median range has increased from 80 miles in 2010 to roughly 250 miles today.
"I think that as people understand more about electric cars," said Cox, "that they're going to be more useful almost everywhere."
Nationally, researchers say issues still have to be sorted out in building up a strong charging network.
That includes drivers encountering broken charging equipment and the need for these sites to be maintained.
get more stories like this via email
The number of pedestrians and bicyclists killed on roadways in the U.S. has nearly doubled in the past 12 years and a New Mexico researcher wants to know why.
Nick Ferenchak, associate professor of civil, construction and environmental engineering at the University of New Mexico, said if you're in a car, you are safer than you have ever been. But it is not true for what the engineering world calls "VRUs," vulnerable road users. Although pedestrian deaths in 2022 were about the same as in 1975, he noted they have increased 83% since reaching their lowest point in 2009.
"Pedestrians and bicyclists are about a quarter of the people killed on our roadways in America," Ferenchak reported. "To put that in context, I think about 400 New Mexicans are killed every year on roads, about 100 of them are pedestrians and about 10 are on bikes."
Nationwide, about 45,000 Americans lose their lives on roadways each year, including 6,000 pedestrians. Another 76,000 pedestrians are injured. Ferenchak leads the newly-formed Center for Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety, which is studying why the increase has occurred among VRUs and helping to identify engineering solutions for city and county planners.
Ferenchak pointed out cyclists tend to raise safety issues and demand roadway improvements, while pedestrians do not have strong advocacy networks. In Albuquerque, he added, many pedestrian deaths occur on dark, arterial roads.
"It doesn't make the problem easier to solve but a lot of the issue is actually at night, which is kind of surprising," Ferenchak observed. "You'd think most people are out walking and biking during the day but a lot of the issues are happening at night."
He emphasized while about 95% of people in Albuquerque drive to work, similar to other cities, but everyone is a pedestrian at some point and higher fatality rates need to be understood and addressed.
get more stories like this via email