A recent report finds crime across cities in Virginia and the nation is in sharp decline.
The Council for Criminal Justice report tracked crime data for 37 cities across the country. Across these cities, homicides were around 10% lower during the first half of 2023, compared with the same period the year before.
Robberies, residential burglaries and aggravated assaults also declined during the same period. However, report co-author Ernesto Lopez said it's interesting that car thefts rose 104%, although there could be a reason behind it.
"Many stolen vehicles over the last few months to a year are likely certain Kia and Hyundai models. Approximately, 9 million of these vehicles can be vulnerable to vehicle theft," he said. "While these manufacturers are now providing security updates, it will take some time to install those updates for a sufficient number of vehicles."
He said it will be interesting to see where vehicle theft rates go from here. A settlement was reached, providing $200 million in compensation for people affected by this particular theft. Safety updates were made available for numerous Kia and Hyundai vehicles, but the Associated Press found 8.3 million cars are still vulnerable to these safety issues.
Even at pre-pandemic levels, crime was still at an all time high. The report found violent crimes reached their lowest levels in 2014, which was on par with crime levels during World War II.
Lopez described what can be done at a policy level to ensure this downward trend continues.
"States and the federal government can provide resources to local governments, or the federal government can provide resources to states," he said. "Also, providing a strong data infrastructure can encourage data sharing amongst agencies."
He added that a challenge to ensuring cities are implementing best practices is funding not being sustained. Also, Lopez noted that crime-reduction programs need to be continuously re-evaluated to ensure they're operating properly.
get more stories like this via email
Groups advocating for people detained in immigration facilities are calling for the reinstatement of a program which allowed 500 free minutes of phone calls per month.
In recent weeks, Immigration and Customs Enforcement cut off the free domestic and international calls, telling advocates pandemic-era funding has run out.
Rosa Santana, interim co-executive director of the Envision Freedom Fund, said families of the detainees often struggle to afford the calls, which can cost up to $3 for 15 minutes.
"Usually the person who is in detention is the breadwinner and now families have to be able to figure out how they could bring food and everything that the breadwinner used to bring, pay rent," Santana pointed out. "And on top of that now, it's having to pay for phone calls."
Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not respond to a request for comment. People in at least 16 ICE detention centers across the country have reported losing access to the free calls, including three sites in California: Golden State Annex, Mesa Verde Processing Center and Otay Mesa Detention Center.
Karim Golding, organizer for the nonprofit Freedom to Thrive, said the phone calls are a lifeline for people in detention; a connection to family that keeps their spirits up. In addition, human rights groups worry it could make it harder to monitor conditions on the inside.
"Absent the phones, how would we know that rights are being violated?" Golding asked. "How would we know if nobody has the ability to communicate?"
People in detention do still have access to work programs where they can earn about $1 for eight hours of work to spend on calls or items at the commissary.
Disclosure: Freedom to Thrive contributes to our fund for reporting on Criminal Justice, Immigrant Issues, LGBTQIA Issues, and Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
A controversial new law is set to take effect next week, requiring Hoosiers to upload sensitive documents, including driver's licenses and Social Security numbers, to access adult content online. The measure aims to prevent minors from viewing explicit materials, but it has sparked significant concerns.
Chris Daley, executive director of the ACLU of Indiana, argues the law infringes on constitutional rights by excessively burdening access for Hoosiers.
"You can't do that in a way that impermissibly burdens an adult's access to the same material. And the state can't use a means to limit a minor's access to adult material if there's a less burdensome means available to do so," Daley said.
Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita supports the law, citing the need to protect children from the psychological impacts of explicit material.
Opponents question the effectiveness of the measure, pointing out that minors could still access adult content through unregulated sites or by using VPNs.
The law also raises concerns about potential censorship of sex education and LGBTQ+ content. Sen. Liz Brown, D-Fort Wayne, chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee when the law made its way through the Statehouse in the 2024 session. She suggests porn sites find it easier to adapt than comply - recently cutting its feed in states such as Louisiana, Mississippi and Utah.
"This isn't about eliminating pornography from the state of Indiana - although I would be OK with this," Brown said. "Pornhub -- and I can't speak for that business -- but they decided that their business model was easier, which would indicate to me that they knew at the time they were operating that they were having minors access their material."
Pornhub and other operators are seeking to block the law, arguing it impinges on adults' free speech and other constitutional rights.
get more stories like this via email
A new bill that takes effect next Monday will allow incarcerated Mississippians to request an absentee ballot in time for the presidential election on November 5.
House Bill 1406 will impact incarcerated Mississippians who have not been convicted of any of the 23 disenfranchisement crimes to be eligible to participate in the electoral process.
Paloma Wu, deputy director of impact litigation at the Mississippi Center for Justice, said they want all eligible Mississippians to vote because it's better for democracy. She added the Magnolia State has a limited excuse-only absentee ballot, meaning people can vote absentee, but only in specific circumstances.
"Many people who are held in jail and imprisoned in Mississippi are actually eligible to vote. And for one large group of those people, they had no excuse, which would have applied to them," she said.
Wu pointed out that Mississippi has one of the highest incarceration rates in the nation, with more than 1,000 people per 100,000 residents behind bars.
Wu noted those who are convicted of one of 23 disenfranchising crimes in a Mississippi court are automatically banned from voting for life. She added the history behind the disfranchising law was to prevent people of color from voting.
"Our list of disenfranchising crimes was created to target primarily descendants of recently enslaved people back in 1890," she explained.
Wu pointed out that her organization, along with other advocacy groups, Mississippi Votes, Black Voters Matter, and Mississippi Center for Re-Entry, collaborated with the state throughout the 2024 legislative session to get House Bill 1406 passed.
get more stories like this via email