By Ilana Newman for The Daily Yonder.
Broadcast version by Eric Galatas for Colorado News Connection for the Public News Service/Daily Yonder Collaboration

Kevin Connor spent a few months living in the Bridge Homeless Shelter transitional housing when he first moved to Cortez, Colorado, after getting out of La Plata County Jail. The Bridge has 12 transitional housing units with most residents paying under $200 a month for housing. 

After leaving the Bridge, Connor lived in a hotel for a bit but was paying more than $400 a week and found it unsustainable. After that, he lived in a storage room at one of his workplaces for four months. 

Connor couldn’t afford a rental in Cortez even while holding multiple jobs.

According to a housing needs assessment, presented at a city council meeting for the City of Cortez, Montezuma County, Colorado, has had the greatest rate of housing cost increases in the State of Colorado between 2018 and 2022 — 16% per year.

Most importantly, for people like Connor who need an affordable place to rent, there are very few rentals that fit the definition of “affordable housing,” which means that they are available for less than 30% of the area median income. In Cortez, for a one-person household, this is around $863, according to Colorado’s Baseline Assistance Tool. During the time of this reporting, the Daily Yonder was able to locate fewer than five rental offers on local rental websites that fit that price range.

In 2022, Colorado voted to approve Proposition 123, which modified the state’s affordable housing programs to create a State Affordable Housing Fund. Several hundred million dollars will be available for municipalities, counties, and tribes to implement affordable housing. To receive the funding, however, municipalities, counties, or tribes have to commit to raise their affordable housing by 9% in three years above a baseline number, determined by the Baseline Assistance Tool. 

Numbers Matter

The issue is that some of the data provided by the Baseline Assistance Tool is wrong. 

According to the tool, the town of Dolores (also in Montezuma County), which has a population of 805, has 334 available units, and 282 affordable units. But the Town of Dolores has 543 households, which would mean that half of the households in Dolores are living in affordable rentals, which is untrue. According to the Tool, this means that Dolores needs to create 30 new affordable units in the next three years.

“There’s not a place to put 30 units in Dolores,” said Shalako Powers, who is currently working on updating this incorrect data. “It’s confined by walls of the canyon on both sides and then a hill coming out on the west and a river canyon on the east. Where are you going to put 30 units in Dolores?”

Powers works for Region 9, the economic district that contains Montezuma County as well as the neighboring four counties that make up Southwest Colorado. Region 9 is a nonprofit community economic development corporation that works closely with the counties and cities on projects like housing, broadband, transit, and other types of economic development.

When Powers spotted the discrepancy in the data, which was originally presented in a publicly available spreadsheet, he worked with the Colorado Division of Housing to develop the Baseline Assistance Tool. Municipalities are required to use this data, but the Baseline Assistance Tool allows the user to adjust for inflation, housing size, and other variables. This means the number can get closer to what feels reasonable for municipalities to commit to. 

But even after committing to Proposition 123, municipalities are then only eligible for the money from the Affordable Housing Fund. Nonprofits, developers, or governments can apply for the grant but are not guaranteed funding. Powers is worried that even if the towns or counties in Southwest Colorado did commit to Proposition 123, they would not receive the funding. 

“Proposition 123 failed in Montezuma County,” said Powers in a Daily Yonder interview. “It did pass as a state but it failed here. My concern is that we’re going to see what we always see. The taxpayers of our rural areas aren’t going to get their money back in their tax refund and none of that money is gonna come back here to provide housing and the people here are just going to get screwed like they always do.” Powers referred to how Proposition 123 passed by 52.6% for the state of Colorado, but lost by 54% in Montezuma County, reflecting the community’s conservative-leaning politics and lack of belief in the solution behind Proposition 123. 

Powers thinks that cities and counties on the Front Range — where the population centers of Denver, Colorado Springs, and Boulder are located — will get the majority of the money because they have grant writers who can pursue it, compared to the more rural areas on the Western Slope where there are fewer staff able to pursue funding. Municipalities have until November 1, 2023, to submit their commitment to qualify for funding. 

A Universal Problem

In the days following the Daily Yonder interview, Connor secured housing – a $750 trailer in Cortez. But he said about the unit that “The entire park should have [been] condemned 20 years ago. These places are almost 50 year old dumps. I also think what I’m in right now was condemned at some point.”

Daniel Stern, communications and outreach manager for the Washington, D.C.-based Housing Assistance Council, said that other rural areas around the country are facing similar challenges around housing availability and affordability. The common issues he sees are lack of supply, aging supply, and a challenge with scaling construction in rural areas. 

“In a rural area, if you need 40 homes or a multi-family house, it’s harder to make that profitable for construction,” Stern said. “That’s why you see so much luxury construction because that’s what pencils out the most unless you use some of the federal programs that are built for building out affordable housing. But those programs… really, really work once you get to a certain scale and that scale is hard to achieve in rural areas.”


Ilana Newman wrote this article for The Daily Yonder.


get more stories like this via email

Recent surveys show a majority of North Dakotans want housing that allows them to live independently as they age. But there aren't a lot of suitable options.

Two architectural design winners hope to address that problem. This week, AARP North Dakota announced the winners of the state's first Missing Middle Housing design competition. The organization worked with several partners on this initiative, noting that older adults considering downsizing are often limited to staying in their costly single-family home, or moving into an apartment-like setting for seniors.

Agatha Frisby, owner of Prairie Centre Architecture, said her winning concept tried to showcase something in between.

"It still gave people that are potentially moving into these homes some individuality and some personal space," she explained.

Frisby's design emphasizes low-maintenance needs and efficient use of daily-living space, such as doing away with hallways and corridors. Affordability was another goal for participants. Project officials say these blueprints were drawn up with Fargo in mind, but could easily be pursued by housing developers and local governments elsewhere.

There was also a category for architectural students.

Noah Boen, a fourth-year architecture student North Dakota State University, saw his design finish in first place. He said some of the smaller details, such as having a front entryway that's functional for this population, could make a big difference.

"When they're getting ready to go out the door, not many older folks have a place where they can sit down, tie their shoes, and have a bunch of storage right next to the door," he explained.

Boen added that all the ground-floor windows are the same dimensions, hopefully making the construction process easier and not too costly for developers. A $5,000 cash prize was awarded to the winning professional design entry, and the student winner received a scholarship.

With housing prices nearly doubling in the last 10 years, the number of Oregonians who can afford to buy a home without assistance has dwindled and a new coalition has formed to change it.

The Unlocking Home Ownership Coalition is made up of more than 20 Oregon organizations, and is submitting plans to the Legislature to help address the problem. The plans include investing in affordable housing, assistance for first-time homebuyers, and closing the 15% homeownership gap for communities of color.

Shannon Vilhauer, executive director of Habitat for Humanity of Oregon, which is leading the coalition, said helping people get a home is the right thing to do.

"Some Oregonians have just done all the right things, right? Worked on credit repair, saving for a down payment," Vilhauer outlined. "And yet interest rates are high, wages have not kept pace with home prices, and sometimes we all need a hand up to enter this first-time homeownership market."

She noted people of color, especially African Americans, have a long history of being excluded from homeownership in Oregon. The state constitution originally banned Black people from owning land. Some were also denied benefits through the GI Bill, or were subject to redlining into the 1990s.

Vilhauer pointed out Portland is an obvious example of systemic racism around housing.

"That's a city where we did have redlining; where a highway was built through generational, African American foundational wealth, and that wealth was actively stripped from communities," Vilhauer explained.

Owning a home means having long-term, stable housing costs and is often more affordable over time than renting. Along with the financial benefits, Vilhauer added studies show kids who grow up in homes their parents own are more likely to graduate from high school and go to college and are more likely to own their own homes.

"When we talk about really generational opportunity and the springboard to being a fully contributing and supported member of the community, we really think that homeownership is a critical piece of that puzzle," Villehauer emphasized.

Heading into the 2025 session, Villehauer is optimistic with the number of state legislators making affordable housing a top priority, the coalition's proposals will move forward.

The faith-based nonprofit Our Calling is working with unsheltered clients in north Texas to create a long-term exit plan to help them rebuild their lives.

More than 4,400 unhoused people live in Dallas and Collin counties. A recent study by the Dallas County Health Department shows it costs more than $193 million annually to care for people experiencing homelessness.

Wayne Walker, founder and pastor of the nonprofit Our Calling, said in its 15 years of operation, it has found a lack of community sends people into homelessness.

"All of us have financial problems, and every single person has crisis in their life," Walker pointed out. "The difference between someone who's experiencing homelessness and one who's not is one of those people had a team of friends that they could call, family in their life, coworkers, and the other one doesn't."

He noted before COVID, they assisted about 15 people per week. The number has now increased to 75 people a week.

Walker explained data collected during the intake process helps them decide the best way to help the unsheltered person.

"We've built a technology platform that allows us to use artificial intelligence as we're looking at the best exit plan for this person," Walker stressed. "Traditionally, years ago, you'd send someone to a shelter or try to get them into some kind of government housing. Well, we would consider that two different exit plans, and in our system we have over 800 different exit plans."

Once a plan is designed and implemented, Our Calling stays in contact with the individual for a year to ensure they are in a healthy community with all the services and support they need to thrive.

They have also created the Neighbor Solutions app to help individuals assist anyone experiencing homelessness. Walker added it can be used by police officers, first responders and everyday citizens.

"Individuals across the U.S. will pull out their phones and open this app to figure out, 'Where is the closest shelter? Where is the closest domestic-violence center? Where can I feed my family?'" Walker outlined. "And that app is the beginning of a platform of apps we've put together to help not only the person experiencing homelessness, but the people that want to help those people experiencing homelessness."


get more stories like this via email