New data from the Sierra Club shows Duke energy is slow to reduce fossil fuel dependence and lower costs for customers.
The utility and its subsidiaries received a combined D in a report for plans to transition to wind, electricity and other renewable energy sources - a slight improvement from last year.
Sierra Club's North Carolina Field Manager Mikaela Curry said the utility's choices are forcing North Carolinians to be locked into polluting infrastructure, and bear the costs.
She said the company faces little to no accountability for how their decision making impacts ratepayers.
"I think it can't be overstated," said Curry, "how important it is to really expand the accountability for Duke to the communities where they're siting their infrastructure."
According to the report, Duke has plans to retire only 30% of coal plant power generation by 2030, while building several new gas plants.
Under the Paris Agreement, the U.S. has committed to slashing greenhouse gas pollution in half by 2030 relative to 2005 levels.
The federal Inflation Reduction Act passed last year made hundreds of billions of dollars available to companies to address climate change, but Sierra Club Energy Campaigns Analyst Noah Ver Beek said utilities continue to delay a transition to clean energy because of things like executive pay being linked to fossil fuel-based asset performance.
"We were really hoping to see a lot more progress this year," said Ver Beek, "especially given all the federal legislation that has passed and all of the new money that is available to really encourage these utilities to make this shift."
He added that nationwide, people of color and low-income communities continue to be exposed to higher levels of dangerous particulate matter pollution than other groups - and are at greater risk for developing diseases linked to chronically breathing dirty air.
Disclosure: Sierra Club contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Energy Policy, Environment, Environmental Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Climate and environmental activists along the Texas Coast are celebrating after receiving favorable news from an insurance company covering liquefied natural gas terminals.
Melanie Oldham, director of the group Better Brazoria Clean Air and Water, said after a meeting with members of their front line community, Chubb Insurance denied coverage for the expansion of one project and they are hopeful the same will be true for a planned plant expansion in Freeport.
"They said keep track of all the operational problems of Freeport LNG and we will keep looking at them," Oldham explained. "And we're hoping Chubb takes the lead and stops insuring these LNG's."
The plant in Freeport is the second-largest in the United States. It was shut down for several months in 2022 following an explosion, which federal investigators said was caused by inadequate operating and testing procedures, human error and fatigue.
Oldham lives about four miles from the Freeport plant and multiple petrochemical companies. Two oil export projects are also proposed for the area. She pointed out the community of around 13,000 people suffers from many illnesses due to the hazardous chemicals released from the plants.
"We have 65% Hispanic, Black, White, Asian; very low-income community," Oldham noted. "I'm a health care professional, I helped Texas Department of State Health do a cancer cluster study here in 2018. We have eight types of cancers higher than to be expected. COPD, it just goes on and on."
Oldham and others said further permitting of oil and gas infrastructure on the Gulf Coast would quadruple gas exports and likely cause hurricanes to hit the region even harder and they are calling on the Biden administration to permanently ban such facilities.
get more stories like this via email
Lansing residents and businesses can breathe easier following a new 15-year renewable energy deal.
The partnership between General Motors and North Star Clean Energy will harness solar power to lower carbon footprints and deliver cleaner energy to the community. The partnership will also supply renewable energy directly to the grid powering GM's Lansing Delta Township and Lansing Grand River assembly plants.
Rob Threlkeld, director of global energy strategy for General Motors, shared how it is also a positive step in the battle against climate change.
"It's really sourcing renewable electricity," Threlkeld explained. "That obviously is replacing fossil generation with renewables, in support of our efforts to address, really, the climate change in general."
The project fuels Michigan's Healthy Climate Plan, signed into law last November by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. The state has a goal to achieve 100% carbon neutrality by 2050.
The state's Healthy Climate Plan also targets generating 60% of Michigan's electricity from renewable sources and phasing out coal-fired power plants by 2030. Threlkeld noted the effort to achieve a healthy climate environment is expansive.
"It's not just GM and a few companies," Threlkeld pointed out. "It's more about how do we scale this beyond the number -- all the way down to our supply chain as well."
Threlkeld added a newly launched solar array in Arkansas will power multiple GM plants across Michigan and Missouri, marking a significant step toward sustainable energy in the automotive industry.
get more stories like this via email
A survey of 760 registered Latino voters found 87% of Latinos support projects to produce a cleaner, natural world.
The poll, conducted in 10 states, including Illinois, was commissioned by the Hispanic Access Foundation. The organization creates outreach efforts to inspire individuals to improve themselves, their families and their communities.
Vanessa Muñoz, waterways program manager for the Hispanic Access Foundation, said the survey showed disparities and injustices in the Latino community and is designed to empower community leaders' push for change and boost issue awareness. She noted the survey's timing is crucial.
"We are in an election year," Muñoz emphasized. "The survey results can play a critical role in shaping and informing policy discussions and ensuring that the needs and perspective of Latino voters are considered in the electoral process."
Among those surveyed, 91% of Latinos support policies for future Congressional sessions such as new national monuments, national parks or wildlife refuges to protect areas for outdoor recreation.
Environmentalists are seeing an increase in Latino advocacy in the challenge to clean up U.S. land and waters, especially in the Mississippi River area.
Muñoz explained one goal is the Biden Administration's 30 by 30 plan, which calls for conserving 30% of America's lands, fresh water and oceans by the year 2030.
"We found that 86% of Latinos think that PFAS or forever chemicals are a major threat to the Mississippi River," Muñoz outlined. "Another one was that 93% of Latinos believe that trash dumped in rivers and streams is a major threat to the Mississippi River."
Other survey respondents were based in Arkansas, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri and Tennessee.
Disclosure: The Hispanic Access Foundation contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Environment, Human Rights/Racial Justice, and Livable Wages/Working Families. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email