A new report showed biomass energy and wood-pellet production may be worse for human health and air pollution in comparison to fossil fuels across North Carolina.
The study found facilities burning biomass release almost three times the number of pollutants compared with places burning fossil fuels.
Sarav Arunachalam, professor and deputy director of the Institute for the Environment at the University of North Carolina, said while the option has been viewed as renewable, there are still health risks.
"There are a lot of hazardous air pollutants also quantified from the study, and they may have other health space endpoints beyond just premature mortality, and these could be cancerous, noncancerous, and so on," Arunachalam explained. "It's a very broad mix of adverse health impacts, but the top one would be fine particulates matter."
Arunachalam pointed out while the demand for biomass within the U.S. remains stagnant, there is a growing market for exporting it to Europe which could further affect communities in the future. In 2021, biomass accounted for nearly 2% of North Carolina's electricity.
Edie Juno, forestry specialist for the National Wildlife Federation and co-author of the study, said wood-pellet facilities could also be emitting more than they claim on their permits, based on data they found in permit applications and national emissions inventories. She suggested it could signal the need for more enforcement.
"We need the state regulatory agencies to be aware of these patterns and really discerning as they're reviewing the permit application," Juno contended. "We probably need support from EPA in terms of enforcement of different air quality permits as well. "
According to the study, biomass contributes 3% to 17% of the emissions from the entire U.S. energy sector. Both researchers noted despite the number being seemingly low, more information is needed to uncover the true effects the facilities have before further investment into the technology.
Disclosure: The National Wildlife Federation contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Endangered Species and Wildlife, Energy Policy, and Water. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
The Conservation Fund, which works to protect land and nature across the U.S. has announced it has protected more than 1 million acres of working forests lands across the country, including in Oregon.
The organization's milestone comes as forests are rapidly disappearing -- as many as 13 million acres in the next few decades.
Brian Dangler, director of the Working Forest Fund with The Conservation Fund, said valuable work continues on the protected land which adds to the nearby economy.
"The beauty of these projects is that the receipts from the timber, the sustainable management of forests, timber harvest really helps local folks to keep the schools going, the fire department, the local services," he explained.
He added The Conservation Fund has helped protect forestland in the Columbia River Gorge near Hood River and Deep River Woods near Astoria. Nationwide, it's secured forests in 21 states. The organization uses community and private partnerships to protect nature.
Dangler said large, intact forests support jobs in rural communities, through logging, trucking, building roads and other activities.
"And, of course, the wildlife habitat that goes along with it. Good forest management usually improves wildlife habitat for lots of different species," he continued.
Dangler noted development is one of the biggest threats to forests, and said it's important to keep forestlands as units rather than smaller parcels.
"Eventually more and more development just nibbles away at these large, intact forests. It's very important for them to be large in landscape," he said. "It's like Humpty Dumpty -- you can't put it back together again when it gets fragmented so much."
Disclosure: Conservation Fund contributes to our fund for reporting on Environment, Hunger/Food/Nutrition, Public Lands/Wilderness, Sustainable Agriculture. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Summer in Indiana produces a variety of festivals, outdoor concerts, and athletic competitions.
These attractions produce large crowds and hundreds of pounds of trash and food containers which could end up in a landfill.
"The Indianapolis Event Waste Guide" is an environmentally-focused publication with resources and contact information for nonprofits and vendors wanting to reduce waste.
Ecosystems Events Owner Julia Spangler said the publication is for events attended by a dozen or thousands of people.
"Bringing people together, especially if you're feeding them or decorating, often generates waste," said Spangler. "So, this guide is all about first, how to reduce the amount of waste generated in the first place, and then how to keep that waste out of the landfill."
Spangler described the publication as a "one-stop shop starting point" for recycling or composting food, waste, leftover lanyards, or banners.
In 2021, Indiana collected more than nine million tons of garbage, refuse, office waste and other similar materials.
The Indianapolis Event Waste Guide was released to coincide with the U.S. Olympic swimming trials held in Indianapolis last month.
As the state continues to draw large crowds at amateur and professional athletic competitions, event planners are looking for ways to reduce their carbon footprint.
Sustain Indy Community Manager, and City of Indianapolis Office of Sustainability Community Engagement Manager Lyndsay Trameri noted the guide is intended for local residents and out-of-town organizers.
"Just because you're planning an event in the town you live in," said Trameri, "that doesn't mean you're aware of all the different contacts and organizations that are local that can help you decrease your footprint."
Trameri added that city leaders have a plan for Indianapolis to be net zero emissions by 2050. Trameri said you can download the free guide on the Visit Indy website.
get more stories like this via email
Weather researchers at Iowa State University say a shifting climate and warmer ocean temperatures are partially responsible for a record number of tornadoes this spring.
More than 100 were reported in Iowa, in May alone.
Eleven hundred tornadoes were reported regionwide in May -- from Texas to Minnesota, and from West Virginia to Georgia. That's more than twice the 30 year average.
One of the fiercest killed five people and injured dozens in rural Greenfield, Iowa.
ISU Severe Weather Meteorologist and Professor of Meteorology William Gallus said extreme heat from a changing climate has increased ocean temperatures, and is one contributing factor to this year's storms.
"Mexico and Texas were having record high temperatures," said Gallus. "That was allowing the Gulf of Mexico to rapidly warm up, get much warmer than normal, which means that is our main source of energy."
Gallus said the weather pattern known as El Niño -- characterized by warmer ocean temperatures that prompt more precipitation and provide fuel for severe weather -- is now shifting to La Niña, marked by cooler seas and drier weather.
That could cause the rest of the tornado season to be less active.
Gallus said the high number of tornadoes in the region was unusual, since climate change models predict Iowa and neighboring states west of the Mississippi should being seeing below average numbers, which they have in recent years.
"The long-term trend has been for tornadoes to be hitting more places east of the Mississippi River," said Gallus.
Gallus said data show tornadoes occurring on fewer days each year, but coming in clusters and with greater intensity.
He says some storms that have been listed as Category F3 are probably F5's, but measurement methods in some areas are not adequate to gauge the storms' intensity.
get more stories like this via email