Some 30,000 Mainers could lose access to critical healthcare benefits under Gov. Janet Mills' proposed supplemental budget.
The state legislature took historic action last year to expand Medicare Savings Programs, which help Medicare recipients with limited incomes afford out-of-pocket expenses.
Mills proposes that expansion be reversed.
Bridget Quinn - associate state director of advocacy and outreach with AARP Maine - said the governor may want to save for a rainy day, but too many Mainers are still struggling to meet their basic needs.
"It hasn't gotten any easier," said Quinn. "A lot of people are still struggling, so for some people the rainy day is here and that is something that we think needs to be considered."
Quinn said Medicare households already spend more than double that of non-Medicare households on their healthcare needs.
Mills has proposed saving more than $100 million to protect the state's long-term fiscal health.
Maine's Budget Stabilization (Rainy Day) Fund has reached nearly $970 million - a record high, so it was a shock for healthcare advocates when a rollback of the Medicare Savings Programs was announced.
Quinn said AARP hears regularly from Mainers struggling to pay for prescription drugs, co-pays and deductibles.
She said limiting Medicare Savings Programs could lead people to avoid needed medical care.
"They're going to wait and delay their appointments and maybe not go in for something that they're concerned about, which can really have huge, detrimental effects down the line."
Quinn urged Mainers to contact their legislators to urge them not to consider a budget that cuts critical healthcare support.
Mills has argued that if lawmakers can't budget responsibly now, they'll be forced to make more painful cuts in the future - like other states are having to do now.
Disclosure: AARP Maine contributes to our fund for reporting on Consumer Issues, Health Issues, Senior Issues, Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
The Missouri Foundation for Health is partnering with The Marshall Project on the launch of a St. Louis nonprofit newsroom highlighting the legal system's effect on health, especially in marginalized communities.
The Marshall Project focuses on investigative, data-driven journalism to explain the justice system, especially to those affected by it. With the foundation's support, its St. Louis newsroom will cover topics like the death penalty, juvenile justice, health care in prison conditions and reentry challenges.
Molly Crisp, senior communications strategist at the foundation, shared the goals of the new partnership.
"We recognize that the criminal justice system disproportionately harms certain populations and that exacerbates health inequities," Crisp explained. "We're hoping through this partnership that we're bringing to light some of the issues that are rampant in the legal system and that we can address those issues."
Statistics show low-income marginalized communities face higher pollution, increasing asthma risk, along with other health problems, and incarcerated individuals often endure long waits for medical care and face barriers to mental health treatment due to staff shortages and limited resources.
Katie Moore, a reporter for the Marshall Project, said its goal is to investigate such issues both locally and statewide.
"We have been talking with different groups, individuals who are connected to the criminal justice system in some way," Moore noted. "To see what their concerns are, what they see as being missing in the media landscape in St. Louis in terms of coverage of some of these more in-depth investigative issues."
With an increasing number of older people who are incarcerated, Missouri prisons face growing health care demands, including the need for geriatric care and hospice services.
Disclosure: The Missouri Foundation for Health contributes to our fund for reporting on Gun Violence Prevention, Health Issues, Philanthropy, and Reproductive Health. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Ohioans are seeing changes in their water infrastructure as cities work to replace lead service lines, a requirement under federal regulations.
But concerns have risen over the materials being used for replacements.
Teresa McGrath, chief research officer with the group Habitable, said while lead exposure poses significant health risks, she cautions against replacing these pipes with polyvinyl chloride due to its environmental and health implications.
"It's important to get those lead pipes out. Let's prioritize that," said McGrath. "But let's not make a regrettable substitution while we do that."
PVC production involves hazardous chemicals, including vinyl chloride, a known human carcinogen. However, PVC remains a popular choice because of its lower cost and ease of installation.
Environmental health advocate Yvette Jordan - the chair emeritus of the Newark Education Workers Caucus, and a steering committee member at Lead Free NJ - underscores the importance for Ohioans to be well informed about their environments.
"What is in their home?" said Jordan. "If they have a service line, is it plastic? Copper? What exactly is it and how does that affect their health, their community, and most importantly their families and children who are most affected by this?"
McGrath highlighted specific concerns about PVC and alternative materials that could be safer.
"The best available water pipe that we have evaluated for use inside a home is copper pipes," said McGrath, "and we will be the first ones to tell you that copper pipes are not perfect, but it is the best available."
get more stories like this via email
March is National Nutrition Month and rising grocery costs, and food recalls have consumers revisiting the idea of growing their own healthier and more affordable food. Research from gardening site, Gardenp.com shows the average garden produces $600 worth of produce. Indiana farmer's markets attract large numbers of Hoosiers who want fresh, farm-grown fruits, vegetables, and other staples at reasonable prices.
Philip Hartman, president of InstaFarm, which creates countertop food gardens, said foods grown in the healthiest chemical-free soil will produce optimum crops.
"So your food that you buy at the grocery store, your produce, has typically lost up to around 50% of its nutritional value by the time it gets to the store. Also, you don't know how it was grown. So the quality of your produce is linked to the quality of your soil," he said.
Lower costs, convenience, and fewer pesticides make garden-to-table food even more appealing. Hartman advises beginner gardeners to use healthy, nutrient-rich soil because it improves the nutritional value of fruits and vegetables. Gardens use a large amount of soil nutrients and when soil is depleted of these necessary nutrients, the crops are affected too.
Hartman works with students from kindergarten through high school and is passionate about helping children understand where their food comes from. He notes children don't get to see a farm or where their food is grown until they are well into their late teens.
"It's amazing, you know, children that don't usually like vegetables, when they engage in the growing process, all of a sudden, they're inspired to eat this and it's a great way to train them about what's good for them and how to recognize healthy foods," he added.
Gardenpals.com says millennials make up 29% of gardener demographics. Indiana is home to over 60,000 farms covering over 19 million acres. The state ranks in the top five for growing corn, soybeans, blueberries, tomatoes and melons, according to the Indiana Department of Agriculture.
get more stories like this via email