Michigan U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib - D-Dearborn - is among the advocates urging Michigan's Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy to more actively involve local residents in its decision making.

They want the agency known as EGLE to revise its criteria for public engagement, and inform residents sooner about decisions that affect the environment and public health.

Rep. Tlaib called the current engagement unacceptable at a news conference late last week.

"The public is only brought into EGLE permitting process when they have almost no power to change the outcome," said Tlaib. "And a corporate polluter has a huge head start with months of back and forth with EGLE."

Industries regularly complain about what they describe as excessive environmental regulation, although community groups describe these concerns as - at best - overstated.

EGLE is currently taking public comment on how it engages the public. The deadline to weigh in is today, April 1.

Donele Wilkins is founder and CEO of the Green Door Initiative, a nonprofit that works on environmental causes.

She said EGLE needs to be proactive, transparent and fair. This includes allowing individuals as much time as companies to participate in the permitting process.

"The agency has the ability to become proactive and respect the delegated responsibility given to them to protect Michigan and all of its residents," said Wilkins. "Bring the public in earlier, rather than at the end of a process."

And Simone Sagovac, coalition building and empowerment director for the Southwest Detroit Community Benefits Coalition, said it's important for EGLE to include measuring current pollution levels in communities before making permit decisions.

"It can't be that the companies control the EGLE process, which is supposed to be about protecting public health," said Sagovac. "We need to know if companies have been accountable to their pollution before they are granted another permit."

As one example, the Fermi 2 nuclear power plant has had permits from EGLE to discharge wastewater that it calls "safe" into Michigan waterways.

However, local environmental advocates argue that these permits were issued without adequately addressing public concerns.




get more stories like this via email

Black communities affected by industrial pollution in South Philadelphia are among those watching a Trump administration rollback of health protections. They say they'll continue calls for the state to address the problems.

President Donald Trump has eliminated the "Justice40" initiative, which was intended to ensure the federal government helps communities located near heavy industry, ports and roadways.

Debbie Robinson, a member of the group Philly Thrive, said they've been working for years to end environmental injustice in their area.

"We want clean air. We want the older people to be able to come outside, sit on their steps and breathe fresh air," she said. "We're doing a lot of stuff, a heap of stuff, trying to make it better."

In the Biden administration, the Environmental Protection Agency made environmental justice a priority, working to improve health conditions in heavily polluted, often minority or low-income communities.

Robinson said she and others have experienced poor air pollution along with extreme flooding. She fought to get a local refinery closed after a 2019 explosion, but said pollution persists, including benzene leaks from a nearby terminal. Philly Thrive is pushing for accountability and transparency as the 1,300-acre site is redeveloped.

"We've been trying for four years to talk to them about a benefits agreement, and they haven't given us a benefits agreement, and they be shutting us down," she said. "It's not good at all. You know, I'm on oxygen; a lot of people have passed away from that refinery, from the chemicals."

She said Philadelphia residents blame the former oil refinery for high asthma and cancer rates. While the HRP Group developing the site reached agreements with 16 community groups on environmental and economic plans, Robinson said Philly Thrive was not included.

A new report highlights steps North Carolina can take as it faces pressing environmental health issues.

The report lays out conclusions from the 9th annual NC BREATHE conference in 2024, which brought together more than 200 people over two days in Durham, including researchers, policymakers and community members.

Emily Wolfe, health manager for the advocacy group CleanAIRE NC, which hosted the event, said one of the report's recommendations is on PFAS contamination, a chemical with major health effects, such as increased cancer risks. Its widespread nature is not well understood.

"The importance of understanding and educating the public, the importance of understanding the research, and then communicating these issues to the public and communities so that they can advocate for themselves," Wolfe urged.

The report said it is important to hold policymakers and regulators accountable and to encourage them to do more to protect public health.

The conference also focused on the effects of extreme heat. Wolfe pointed out it is an issue for everyone but especially vulnerable groups like communities of color and low-income neighborhoods. She noted in winter months, the law prohibits disconnecting someone's utilities even if they cannot pay the bill but it is not the case in increasingly hot summer months.

"It could be extremely hot for days and never cool off at night," Wolfe emphasized. "If a person is unable to pay their power bill, they could still have their power disconnected and then that can become a major safety issue."

Justin Cook, a climate journalist and photographer based in Durham, who spoke at NC BREATHE on a panel about the effects of climate change on mental health, said changing landscapes in North Carolina from extreme weather are making people feel out of place. He added hopelessness in the face of the crisis is a luxury people who are rebuilding from disasters do not have time for.

"Taking action and that feeling of agency is what helps people push through these things," Cook stressed. "It's what makes them feel the most useful and it gives them more of a sense of purpose. And it's actually a really helpful survival tool in the age of climate chaos."

A judge has ruled that elected officials in St. James Parish broke Louisiana's open meetings law by conferring secretly with a Chinese company seeking to build a chemical plant.

The complaint, filed in 2019 by the community group RISE St. James, took five years to work through the courts.

However, on January 6, a state court ruled that parish council and planning commission members met without proper public notice with the Wanhua Chemical Group.

Sharon Lavigne. executive director of RISE St. James, said the meeting shows the level of dishonesty among local leaders.

"St. James is so corrupt until, you know, you have little hope - because we're fighting this other plant, and they voted for it to come in anyway, even though we said no," said Lavigne. "We are loaded. We are full. We can't take anymore. And for the judge to vote in our favor, that was like a miracle."

The chemical plant would have been located along a portion of the Mississippi River known as Cancer Alley.

Statistics show people in the area have a 95% greater chance of developing cancer than the average American.

Lavigne said there are more than 200 heavy industry plants along the corridor, located mostly near low-income communities of color.

She said public officials in St. James and other parishes along the river have a long history of excluding local neighborhoods from the licensing industry process.

"We have to fight so hard to breathe clean air and drink clean water, when our politicians could just tell these industries, 'No. You can't come into St. James because we are full,'" said Lavigne. "But they don't do that. For this Open Meetings Law, I feel that our own Parish Council betrayed us."

Despite being found guilty, parish officials were not fined or sanctioned for their actions - other than having to pay RISE St. James and other plaintiff's attorney's fees.

Lavigne said she was glad but still surprised at the verdict.

"I just thought the judge would rule against us," said Lavigne. "Even though we went to court, and I wasn't expecting a victory. I really wasn't because they do things under cover, and they meet with these industries without our knowledge. It's not the first one, but this is the one we caught."


get more stories like this via email