Un nuevo informe profundiza en la rotación de funcionarios electorales durante más de dos décadas. Dice que las tasas han aumentado constantemente en todo el país desde el año 2000, con el nivel más alto en 2022. El estado de Washington ha experimentado tasas de rotación más bajas que muchos estados, aumentando del 23% en 2004 al 33% en 2022, según el Centro de Política Bipartidista. Rachel Orey, de la organización, dice que los funcionarios electorales tienen trabajos cada vez más complejos junto con la logística diaria, lo que probablemente impulse la rotación.

"Hoy en día, los funcionarios electorales deben gestionar todo, desde los riesgos de ciberseguridad que plantean los adversarios extranjeros hasta las comunicaciones públicas de personas que dudan del resultado de las elecciones, pasando por la tecnología de la información, las disputas legales, las presiones políticas y los recursos humanos. La lista continua," examinó la entrevistada.

Si bien Washington ha experimentado tasas de rotación más bajas que otros estados, se proyecta que el Oeste tendrá la rotación más alta de cualquier región en 2024, con una tasa de casi el 42%. Orey explica que los aumentos recientes se han producido en jurisdicciones más grandes, que han recibido la peor parte del escrutinio tras las elecciones de 2020.

Ella argumenta que las crecientes cargas de trabajo para los funcionarios electorales han coincidido con informes generalizados de amenazas y acoso que están haciendo que la administración electoral sea un trabajo insostenible.

"Ahí es donde los legisladores estatales y federales realmente pueden intervenir para proporcionar recursos adecuados, niveles de compensación competitivos y protecciones de seguridad para los funcionarios electorales," mencionó Orey.

Sin embargo, la rotación no significa necesariamente que las personas que asumen el control sean inexpertas. Orey añade que los nuevos funcionarios tienen un promedio de ocho años de experiencia en puestos de alto nivel.

"Entonces, cuando vemos un cambio en un funcionario electoral jefe, no siempre se da el caso de que llega alguien nuevo que no sabe lo que está haciendo. Más bien, vemos con mayor frecuencia que son personas con mucha experiencia en elecciones quienes están asumiendo estos roles principales," insistió también Orey.



get more stories like this via email

A new report showed turnover among California chief election officials reached 57% in 2022, a record high. It then declined this year to 40%.

Researchers at the University of California-Los Angeles partnered with the Bipartisan Policy Center to analyze the data from 18,000 jurisdictions nationwide.

Rachel Orey, senior associate director of the Elections Project for the Bipartisan Policy Center, said the jobs of election workers have become significantly harder in recent years.

"Today, election officials must manage everything from cybersecurity risks posed by foreign adversaries to people who are doubting the outcome of elections, to information technology, legal disputes, political pressures," Orey outlined.

The turnover rate is defined as the percentage of jurisdictions in a state where the chief local election official changed within the prior four years. It has been an issue in California for decades. The turnover rate stood at 41% back in 2004. But things got much worse after 2020, when election officials became targets of threats and harassment, often spurred by former President Donald Trump's evidence-free claims about a rigged election.

Orey noted she expects this year's presidential election to go smoothly, because dozens of states, including California, have done a lot to "beef up" the elections workforce.

"Sixty-five percent of local election officials have experience running a presidential election," Orey pointed out. "Where there are new officials, we find that they have an average of eight years of experience in an election office. So all in all, we see that election officials are well-prepared to administer the 2024 presidential election."

The report recommended better funding for elections offices, higher salaries and more training in order to attract and retain a highly skilled election workforce.

Support for this reporting was provided by The Carnegie Corporation of New York.


get more stories like this via email

North Dakota's June 11 primary is inching closer and those running for legislative seats are trying to win over voters, including Native American candidates who are part of a movement energized by newly drawn political boundaries.

The organization North Dakota Native Vote said there are seven candidates with Indigenous roots seeking spots in the Legislature. Most are running in District 9, which was recently updated to reflect representation needs for two Native American tribes.

Natasha Gourd, a board member of North Dakota Native Vote, described them as a good mixture of candidates coming from both reservations in the area, with some running as Democrats and others as Republicans.

"We've seen an upturn in participation and just getting leadership development through Native candidates," Gourd observed.

The election wave comes after the state saw 10 Native candidates in legislative races two years ago. For her group, Gourd acknowledged the boost can be tricky because they cannot endorse everyone running. But she noted having greater assurances the areas will be represented by people from their community -- no matter if they have a different stance on certain issues -- is still a positive.

Gourd added trying to build on the momentum is also important for off-reservation districts.

"What they do at the state level, regardless of Native American people in North Dakota (being part of) federally recognized tribes, it does affect us," Gourd pointed out. "Most Natives in North Dakota do live off the reservation, so it does affect our populations."

Gourd stressed they need more Native voices at the state level speaking out about priorities within education, the housing crisis, energy issues and health care. She hopes the positive trends they're seeing inspire more civic participation among other racial and ethnic groups trying to get a seat at the policy table in North Dakota.

A new poll finds a near 20-year low in the number of voters who say they have a high interest in the 2024 election, with a majority saying they hold negative views of both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump. A group of Arizona elections officials and experts recently gathered to discuss the growing discontent with the state's current electoral landscape.

Stephen Richer, Maricopa County Recorder, said that if politicians are what he calls "single-minded seekers of re-election," he contends the state should change the political incentive structure.

"And if those incentives will change, then maybe we will be talking about more things in the Arizona Voter's Agenda and less things that are currently right now incentivized by what I still believe to be a minority, but a very passionate, very loud, and a minority that is definitely committed to acting on those issues," he said.

Richer added it is important to remember that despite Independent and unaffiliated voters being able to participate in the July 30th statewide primary, they were excluded from the state's March Presidential Preference Election, and that has caught the eye of some in the state. The bipartisan group Make Elections Fair Arizona is pushing for open primaries, but proponents of closed primaries believe they're crucial to maintaining the integrity of party ideals.

Amanda Burke, executive vice president with the non-partisan, nonprofit organization Center for the Future of Arizona, said more than half of unaffiliated voters do not feel they have leaders or candidates running who speak to the issues and causes they care about. She contends that then translates to who decides to show up at the ballot box and vote, and encourages Arizonans to imagine a different primary system if they want different outcomes.

"Otherwise we are going to continue to have some more outcomes in terms of people who are incentivized to speak to a small percentage of their base on either side who are really not representative of the larger views," she explained.

The Grand Canyon State allows voter-initiated amendments to the state constitution, but the Arizona Require Partisan Primary Elections Amendment would add the state's current primary practice to the state constitution, prohibiting future changes without another constitutional amendment. Make Elections Fair Arizona is still collecting signatures to get its measure on the November ballot.


get more stories like this via email