The North Carolina Utilities Commission is giving residents a chance to voice their opinion on a plan which could influence how their electricity is generated and impact costs for years to come.
The state is updating its Carbon Plan, and in it Duke Energy is proposing a build out of 8.9 gigawatts of new gas plants, representing one of the largest buildouts of new gas plants of any utility in the country. The plan is raising concerns among residents and environmental advocates.
Naomi Albert, North Carolina field coordinator for the advocacy group Appalachian Voices, warned it could affect electricity rates, while posing risks to the state's climate goals and community health.
"For the communities that are directly adjacent to them, there are health concerns," Albert pointed out. "Burning fossil fuels, like methane gas and coal, produces air pollutants like sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and others that contribute to the development of a whole host of diseases including lung disease, asthma."
Albert highlighted the issue of winter reliability. During Winter Storm Elliot, the failure of gas-powered generation resulted in widespread power outages across the eastern half of the U.S., including 500,000 Duke Energy customers in the Carolinas.
Residents will get the chance to speak in person this week at two public hearings. The first hearing will be today in Wilmington at the New Hanover Courthouse, and the second will take place Tuesday at the Durham County Courthouse.
House Bill 951 outlines energy targets North Carolina utilities must achieve, including a 70% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in the electric power sector by 2030, and complete carbon neutrality by 2050. Albert pointed out the proposed plan does not help meet the stated goals and will leave customers with unpredictable bill increases, driven by fuel volatility.
"Recent analysis by EDF and EQ Research shows that high gas prices have driven up electricity rates in recent years," Albert reported. "They found that increased fuel costs drove 67% of the increase in residential rates in Duke Energy Carolina service territory. "
Albert believes improvements can be made to the plan to meet the goals outlined by the state and incorporate resources to increase renewable energy. As the public hearings approach, she urged North Carolinians to raise their voice and share what they think. People unable to make the in-person hearings can leave a comment on the commission's website.
get more stories like this via email
Virginia has certain restrictions in place for workers handling animal waste in order to avoid contaminating groundwater sources. But one expert says the Commonwealth could do more to educate people about the risk.
Last year, Virginia updated regulations for animal waste at animal feeding operations. One of those regulations included ensuring that storage areas are higher than one foot above the seasonal high water table.
Bryan Dunning, a senior policy analyst for the nonprofit Center for Progressive Reform, said the Commonwealth took a step in the right direction with increased monitoring.
"It's for all facilities constructed after '98," he said. "So, that is some improved monitoring to get an idea of if there are problems with the facility that is breaching into the groundwater."
Dunning added that pre-1998 systems are grandfathered in under the new regulations. The agriculture industry accounts for half of the nitrogen and phosphorus that sucks oxygen out of Chesapeake Bay, which is needed to sustain aquatic life.
Dunning said Virginia officials could take steps to further combat groundwater contamination from manure at animal-feeding operations. That includes making data electronically available to the general public without the need to file a Freedom of Information Act request.
"Public information for these sorts of things is really important because if you source your water for your house from a private well, you're responsible for making sure that your water's clean," he said. "And without having that sort of publicly available database, basically to increase public knowledge, you're kind of operating in an information blackhole. "
Dunning added that unauthorized discharge of animal waste should be publicly disclosed. Confinement operators have said they are always looking for ways to be more environmentally friendly, while also keeping up with consumer demand for high-quality meat.
get more stories like this via email
Environmental advocates are waiting for results from legislation passed last year, regulating the use of industrial sludge from flowing into waterways like the Chesapeake Bay.
Before laws were passed, the state had limited regulations dealing with the handling and use of industrial sludge, often made up of leftovers from meat processing facilities, which are then used as farmland fertilizers. Mishandling or overuse of the fertilizers would lead to the contamination of groundwater and flow into waterways.
Evan Isaacson, senior attorney for the Chesapeake Legal Alliance, said it was even common for neighboring states with tighter regulations on industrial sludge to transport it to Maryland for dumping.
"We had essentially become the dumping ground for industrial sludge," Isaacson recounted. "It was just an opportunistic business opportunity, I guess, for that industry to evade existing regulatory frameworks in their home states and send it to Maryland."
A 2023 study by the University of Maryland found more than half of industrial sludge land applied in Maryland came from other states. The Maryland Department of Agriculture oversees the year-old regulations governing industrial sludge.
Isaacson argued the department could change regulations to promote more transparency or put out a report on industrial sludge. He pointed out some issues, like farm privacy, means the department's regulations are not always created with as much transparency in mind, like with the Maryland Department of the Environment. Isaacson hopes other states without regulations will introduce their own standards to keep industrial sludge from being dumped in neighboring states.
"Once this regulatory program is up and running properly, it fixes that problem," Isaacson emphasized. "At the very least, we're hoping that we no longer become the regional dumping ground and that those sources in Delaware and Virginia keep their material in Delaware and Virginia."
The neighboring states of Pennsylvania and West Virginia currently have no regulations on the use and dumping of industrial sludge.
get more stories like this via email
Recognizing climate change is not isolated to certain parts of New Mexico, legislators are considering bills to help protect the state's air, land and water.
One in three counties in the state has experienced devastating fire and flood damage in recent years.
Shelley Mann-Lev, executive director of the advocacy group Healthy Climate New Mexico, a group of public health professionals and students who believe climate change is the greatest threat to residents' health, as well as the state's ability to provide health care in local communities, said the effects are far-reaching.
"It's not just chronic diseases," Mann-Lev pointed out. "Heat, flooding, fires, drought are creating incredible health threats and if we don't take action, we'll make it so that we will not have a livable future."
According to the 2024 Conservation in the West poll, 59% of New Mexicans consider climate change a "very" or "extremely serious" issue. Mann-Lev noted the bills would address climate change head-on to achieve the state's goal of reducing greenhouse gases by 45% by 2030, compared to 2005 levels.
New Mexico experienced its largest and most destructive wildfire in the state's history in 2022. But Mann-Lev stressed residents' health is also affected by wildfires as far away as California or Montana, depending on wind conditions.
"Part of what makes us as New Mexico so vulnerable is that so many people in our population already have serious health problems," Mann-Lev observed. "We already have higher rates of child asthma."
New Mexico also is the second-largest oil-producing state in the U.S. behind Texas, and the nation's top natural gas producer. Mann-Lev believes the legislation would align pollution reduction goals.
"We also can demonstrate that an important oil and gas producing state can make the investments and make this transition in a way that sustains our economy, supports our communities in the process," Mann-Lev contended. "So that it's not just being done 'to them,' it's being done with them."
She added the state's Community Benefit Fund would invest $340 million in infrastructure, workforce development, renewable energy projects, energy efficiency upgrades and more.
get more stories like this via email