Connecticut is slated to join a national nursing compact.
House Bill 5058 got the General Assembly's approval and awaits Gov. Ned Lamont's signature. The legislation allows Connecticut nurses to get a license permitting them to work in other compact participating states.
Cassandra Esposito, president of the Connecticut Nurses Association, said while it can attract nurses to work in the state, it does not alleviate workforce issues nurses face.
"It has to do with working conditions," Esposito explained. "We look at staffing, we look at workplace violence, we look at ways that nurses do their job, and the things that are making them a little bit harder to do their jobs."
Legislation established better nurse-to-patient staffing ratios and implemented better hospital security. The Connecticut Nurses Association pushed to resolve some issues, ensuring the compact was right for the state.
Lawmakers worked to address impacts to programs like HAVEN with an amendment that also develops a working group supporting compact implementation and addressing any unintended consequences. After three years, the working group will evaluate the efficacy of the compact on Connecticut.
Nationwide workforce shortages are not the only thing straining nurses. Burnout and mental health issues only aggravated by the pandemic are causing people to leave the field. Esposito argued barriers to nurses seeking help must be removed so the workforce thrives.
"Provide them with options," Esposito emphasized. "If your health care workers aren't well, the health care workers themselves suffer. The workforce itself suffers, patients, health care delivery as a whole suffers, so we really need to do more to take care of the mental health of our nurses."
Among respondents to an American Nurses Foundation survey, 64% said they feel stressed because of their job. Stress and other factors led to the national turnover average of nurses being as high as 37%, depending on location and specialty.
get more stories like this via email
As Mississippi lawmakers move forward with a potential Medicaid expansion, advocates said the state cannot afford further delays while thousands remain without health care.
Two so-called "dummy bills" are advancing through the House and Senate Medicaid committees, but the policy remains in limbo as legislators wait for clarity from Washington, D.C.
Kimberly Campbell, state director for AARP Mississippi, has been working on Medicaid expansion for several years and said the fight is far from over.
"There still needs to be some more discussions to figure out how can we get something that moves the state forward as far as access to health care," Campbell emphasized. "Access to quality health care for more individuals than we have now that are covered under any type of health program."
Mississippi is one of 10 states to have not expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, leaving an estimated 125,000 Mississippians without access to affordable health care. While last year's legislative session saw historic movement, expansion failed in the final hours as House and Senate leaders clashed over the details.
Advocates like Campbell argue expanding Medicaid would have far-reaching effects, including boosting the state's economy, strengthening rural hospitals and improving public health.
"Mississippi, unfortunately, we have some of the worst health outcomes here in the state," Campbell pointed out. "That would change a lot of those things. That would change our life span, and not only just the years of life but the quality of the years of life."
Gov. Tate Reeves remains firmly opposed to expanding Medicaid in Mississippi. In his recent State of the State address, he reaffirmed his stance against broadening coverage, citing concerns potential federal policy changes under President Donald Trump's administration could increase state costs for expanded welfare programs.
Reeves has consistently referred to Medicaid expansion as "welfare" and has resisted efforts to increase enrollment, despite growing support from key Republican legislative leaders.
Disclosure: AARP Mississippi contributes to our fund for reporting on Civic Engagement, Community Issues and Volunteering, Health Issues, and Senior Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Florida residents who depend on Medicaid said they fear for their futures as lawmakers consider $2.3 trillion in federal cuts, which could force states to reduce services, cut eligibility or lower provider payments.
The proposal, first reported by Politico, has drawn opposition from health advocates who said the reductions would hit hardest among children, seniors and people with disabilities.
During a news conference organized by the Florida Policy Institute, Virginia, a Medicaid recipient in Alachua County, shared how the program has given her independence despite living with a disability.
"If Congress was to cut Medicaid or government was to cut Medicaid. I don't know how I would live," she said. "I have no family to go to. Both my parents are low-income housing. My father is pretty much disabled. He cannot help me at all. My mother is not in the picture."
The potential cuts include $9.8 billion in per capita reductions to cap how much funding Florida could receive. Proponents have suggested reducing federal Medicaid funding would compel states to make more prudent decisions regarding their health care budgets.
Joan Alker, executive director of the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families, warned these cuts would leave states with difficult choices.
"Cuts of this magnitude would force states to make very painful choices about cutting services, cutting benefits, reducing payments to providers, cutting eligibility," she said.
For the Rev. Latifah Griffin, whose 10-year-old son has cerebral palsy, Medicaid makes it possible for him to access specialized care, mobility devices and a pediatric extended care facility.
"I would literally struggle to take care of him," Griffin said. "I would likely need to quit my job because I would need to stay home due to being able, unable to afford the services for him without Medicaid. Then, I too will become a burden on an already broken system."
Medicaid serves 2.4 million Floridians, covering two of every five children in the state. A nationwide outage in government payment processing systems temporarily froze Medicaid funding to states, causing widespread confusion. The crisis followed President Donald Trump's recent executive orders, which briefly paused federal spending on various programs, excluding Medicare and Social Security.
Disclosure: The Georgetown University Center for Children and Families contributes to our fund for reporting on Children's Issues, and Health Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Changes could be coming for Arkansans who are on Medicaid.
Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders is proposing to add work requirements for some Medicaid recipients. Similar rules were imposed in the state in 2018 but later struck down by the Biden administration.
Neil Sealy, senior organizer for Arkansas Community Organizations, said more than 18,000 people lost coverage seven years ago although they were working or had been granted exemptions.
"We reached out to people to speak with them about their experience," Sealy explained. "There was a reporting requirement, and if after three months if you had not reported, then you would be taken off. "
He noted some recipients were unaware they did not have coverage until they tried to go to the doctor. Sanders is hopeful the requirements will remain in place under the new Trump administration.
According to a report in Forbes Magazine, Arkansas is the fourth-least healthy state in the country. Around 820,000 Arkansans are on Medicaid.
Specific details about Sanders' proposal have not been released but she said she wants a broader requirement to cover able-bodied adults. Sealy noted their volunteers are already mobilizing.
"We get ready," Sealy emphasized. "We are reaching out to people in the community. We are going to be on the doors, talking in churches, getting ready. We don't sit down and take it. "
A Harvard study showed in 2018 the work requirements did not decrease unemployment and red tape and paperwork created serious hurdles for people who were eligible for coverage.
get more stories like this via email