New Mexico's Gila Wilderness is special - not only for its natural beauty, but also because it received the world's first-ever "wilderness" designation, 100 years ago today.
Conservation groups are working to preserve the Gila for future generations, while also keeping it open to hunters and those who fish its abundant waters.
Elle Benson is the Rio Grande program manager for the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. Born and raised in the town of Gila, population 175, Benson knows the area well.
"The Gila Wilderness is our state's largest wilderness area," said Benson. "It has the headwaters of the Gila. Whitewater Baldy is the highest peak within the Gila Wilderness - it's just under 11,000 feet in elevation."
Benson said much of the partnership's federal funding goes to smaller watershed collaboratives doing state restoration work.
Conservationists, along with local and state representatives, have been trying for nearly a decade to get Congress to pass the MH Dutch Salmon Greater Gila Wild and Scenic River Act - which would protect nearly 450 miles of the Gila and San Francisco Rivers and their tributaries.
Much of the credit for the 1924 Gila Wilderness designation - 40 years before Congress passed the Wilderness Act - goes to Aldo Leopold, often called the father of wildlife ecology and modern conservation.
Benson said it was Leopold proposed setting aside the 755,000 acres while working as a forest supervisor in New Mexico.
"There's recreation that happens out there because of the biodiversity," said Benson, "so, hunting, fishing, camping, backpacking, horseback riding, etc. And I've seen coatimundi out there."
If you're not familiar with the coatimundi, it's a mammal that looks like a combination of lemur and monkey, but is officially part of the raccoon family.
Several New Mexico events will commemorate the 100 year anniversary, including the Gila River Festival, starting on September 27.
Disclosure: Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Endangered Species & Wildlife, Environment, Public Lands/Wilderness. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Two new national monuments in California are in jeopardy after the White House announced a plan to revoke them and then appeared to retreat.
On Saturday, the White House told the Washington Post President Donald Trump planned to rescind President Joe Biden's order creating the Chuckwalla National Monument near Palm Springs and the Sáttítla Highlands National Monument in Northern California. Then language about the moves disappeared from a White House fact sheet with no explanation.
Janessa Goldbeck, CEO of the Vet Voice Foundation, which advocated for the creation of the two new monuments, said the move was not unexpected.
"This administration has been pretty clear that they want to utilize federal public lands as a giveaway to corporate polluters and private developers," Goldbeck noted. "We are anticipating, whether it's these two monuments or others, that there will be some attempts to reverse federally protected public lands."
Trump claimed the monuments "lock up vast amounts of land from economic development and energy production." But Goldbeck pointed out Chuckwalla has not been targeted for oil and gas drilling or mining but rather is most valuable for outdoor recreation and wildlife habitat. The White House has yet to take concrete steps to rescind the monument designations.
Brandy McDaniels, national monument lead for the Pit River Nation, said the tribe has been fighting off geothermal development and other industrial uses for decades.
"This is not a Biden vs. Trump situation. It is a tribally led initiative that's been going on for a very long time," McDaniels explained. "This is a sacred landscape for our people. It is the actual place of the creation narrative of our people."
Sáttítla, also known as the Medicine Lake Highlands, is also home to the headwaters providing much of California's drinking water.
get more stories like this via email
The Sierra Club is taking the Trump administration to court, joining a slew of legal challenges over the mass firings of federal workers.
Sierra Club Managing Attorney Gloria Smith said the purge conducted by Trump's Department of Government Efficiency will have immediate impacts on Colorado's public lands and parks.
Trails won't be maintained and campgrounds will not be cleaned up.
"You know, after a long winter and the snow and storms, there's a lot of work that goes into making a park presentable and safe for the high season," said Smith, "when millions and millions of people visit."
Federal judges in California and Maryland have ruled that the firings were illegal, and ordered the Trump administration to immediately rehire up to tens of thousands of probationary workers across multiple agencies.
The Maryland court ruled in favor of a lawsuit brought by Colorado's Phil Weiser and 20 other state attorneys general.
The Trump administration has called the rulings an unconstitutional effort to seize the power of hiring and firing from the Executive Branch, and promised to appeal.
Smith said she supports the recent court decisions, but notes it remains to be seen whether or not the Trump administration will follow court orders.
She said park visitor safety, wildlife protection, and wildfire prevention are all still at risk. And she said workers dedicated to protecting lands owned by all Americans deserve better.
"Obviously this is of the highest importance," said Smith. "People have lost their jobs. This is going to affect communities, people's families. They can't pay their rent or their mortgages."
Sierra Club members are especially concerned about firings at the National Park Service, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Forest Service, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - which includes the National Weather Service.
Smith said real-time weather service data is vital.
"For example, on a rafting trip, if there's a huge storm then there are flash flood risks," said Smith. "So the National Weather Service is absolutely critical."
Disclosure: Sierra Club contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Energy Policy, Environment, Environmental Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
By Danielle Zulkosky for WISH-TV.
Broadcast version by Joe Ulery for Indiana News Service reporting for the WISH-TV-Free Press Indiana-Public News Service Collaboration
Indiana Dunes National Park has lost five employees in the wake of federal cuts hitting national parks, which has raised concerns about park safety and maintenance.
Save the Dunes is an official partner of the Indiana Dunes National Park. The nonprofit is focused on the preservation and restoration of the Indiana Dunes.
Betsy Maher, executive director of Save the Dunes, says the loss of staff could lead to longer lines and poorly managed facilities.
“(It could lead to) unkempt bathrooms, possibly closed down camping sites, overflowing trashcans,” Maher said, highlighting the potential impact on park visitors.
At least one person who mowed the park was laid off, meaning grass could be unmanaged for visitors at times.
But it’s not just bathrooms, grass, and trash cans. The reduction in staff also poses safety risks, with fewer park rangers available for rescues and medical attention.
Maher also emphasizes the importance of maintenance workers and firefighters.
“This area is very prone to fires,” Maher said. “It takes active management to keep those fires at bay.”
Other employees who were let go worked in areas such as restoration management. The park has borders the zig zag through northern Indiana sometimes coming up against industry or residential areas.
Maher says these employees were “critical” for preserving the park’s biodiversity in these areas. Lack of preservation along the borders can have “catastrophic” consequences.
“You have very actively managed lands on the national park side and completely unmanaged lands right across the border,” Maher said. “So it’s very easy for those invasive species, especially those plant species, to get dropped and to take hold in the national park.”
Indiana Dunes National Park is renowned for its biodiversity. Maher said it is the fifth most biologically diverse National Park in the United States.
Despite the challenges posed by staff reductions, Save the Dunes will continue to advocate for the protection of the Indiana Dunes National Park’s unique environment and visitor experience.
Danielle Zulkosky wrote this article for WISH-TV.
get more stories like this via email