Gov. Glenn Youngkin is rolling back Virginia's clean-car standards.
The General Assembly passed legislation adopting California's clean-car standards to reduce emissions in 2021. State Attorney General Jason Miyares issued an opinion saying Virginia's compliance with California's Air Resources Board is not required.
Connor Kish, director of the Virginia chapter of the Sierra Club, said it will have vast implications.
"Steps that are being taken by the governor to unwind those standards are going to hurt air quality in Virginia," Kish contended. "If you look at where the air pollution occurs the most along highway corridors where impacted communities are going to bear a higher brunt of the tailpipe emissions."
Tailpipe exhaust makes up a majority of the state's carbon dioxide emissions. Last year, Republicans in the House passed a bill attempting to repeal the same standards.
A 2022 poll showed Virginians are overwhelmingly in favor of reducing emissions and moving to cleaner cars but Youngkin's move reduces the cleaner options available to consumers.
Some feel it aligns with Youngkin's environmental stance, although it was still unexpected.
Trip Pollard, senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center, feels it is akin to Youngkin pulling the state out of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative last year. He said misinformation about the standards is guiding the governor's decision.
"One is this idea that Virginia has somehow abdicated its state sovereignty to unelected bureaucrats in California and that we can set our standards," Pollard noted. "We can't under the Clean Air Act."
Virginia's options, as with all other states, are to either use the standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency or adopt more protective standards.
He added other misinformation being spread is about the environmental benefits of electric vehicles. The electricity used to power an EV in the state emits less than 17% of the carbon dioxide produced by a gas car.
Disclosure: The Sierra Club contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Energy Policy, Environment, and Environmental Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Two new studies find that without sustained intervention, California may permanently lose big sections of old-growth giant sequoia groves.
The majestic trees only grow on the western slope of the Sierra Nevada. Since 2015, 20% of them have died, mostly in three megafires in 2020 and 2021.
David Soderberg, Ph.D, a biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey and a study co-author, said the blazes incinerated many of the older, seed-bearing trees.
"You're getting much larger patches of fires burning at what's called high severity. So, you have this kind of bad combination for the sequoias where many more of the mature trees are dying, and there are many fewer of the seedlings regenerating," he explained.
The studies show there are substantially fewer seedlings than in the past, and those that germinate are imperiled by drought and heat stress linked to climate change. The Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition partners have planted more than 500,000 native seedlings in severely burned areas where reproduction has been insufficient.
Paul Ringgold, chief program officer with the Save the Redwoods League, said the idea is to give forest regeneration a head start.
"When you're planting seedlings, you're planting trees that have been grown in the nursery for two years or more. They're more robust than a seedling that is sprouting from a seed, giving it a little bit of an edge against the impact of drier, hotter summers," he said.
Old-growth sequoia are the world's largest trees and depend on fire to reproduce. But Ringgold noted that past fire-suppression efforts have led to a buildup of excessive fuel loads in the forests. So, extensive projects are underway to clear out dead vegetation and make the groves more resilient to fire.
Disclosure: Save the Redwoods League contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Endangered Species & Wildlife, Environment, Public Lands/Wilderness. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Nearly 10,000 Montanans have petitioned the U.S. Forest Service to prevent mining activity in the iconic Smith River watershed.
The Smith is known for its majestic views and numerous wildlife species but it is also a huge draw for outdoor enthusiasts seeking to "disconnect." The Smith River Public Lands Coalition has called on the Forest Service to withdraw mineral leases granted to a company planning a $4 billion copper mine on private land near Sheep Creek, which feeds the Smith more than half of its water.
Josh Seckinger, a Bozeman-based Smith River guide, estimated he has floated the 5-day, 59-mile-long Smith 100 times. He thinks the copper sulfide mine drainage would be devastating.
"It just decimates anything with gills downstream," Seckinger pointed out. "That's fish, that's amphibians, that's aquatic bug life. It's a terrible way to sterilize a river."
Mine developer Black Butte Copper said it is committed to preserving Montana's water while creating economic development opportunities in the state, and claims it can build the mine in an environmentally friendly way.
Seckinger noted beyond the environmental and wildlife damage the mine drainage could cause, it also threatens the local landscape and the recreational economy built around the Smith River. He argued it is not just a hit to the businesses but to Montanans who want to experience the trip. It requires winning a permit in a state lottery.
"It is my hope that every resident of this state puts in for a lottery permit and wins, so they get the chance to experience this place," Seckinger emphasized. "Because once you experience this place, you understand immediately why it needs to be protected."
Black Butte Copper has bought nearly 700 claims on the public lands surrounding the one near Sheep Creek, potentially allowing the company to further expand its mining operations.
get more stories like this via email
A Michigan environmental group is addressing an appeal challenging the state's decision to approve the enclosure of the Enbridge Line 5 pipeline.
Built in 1953, this pipeline transports up to 540,000 barrels of petroleum daily through the Great Lakes.
Enbridge aims to build a protective tunnel around a four mile segment at the Straits of Mackinac, which connects Lake Michigan and Lake Huron.
Environmental groups and tribal leaders want the state to reverse Enbridge's permit, citing concerns about a potential catastrophic oil spill.
The nonprofit group Oil & Water Don't Mix is dedicated to preventing oil spills and promoting clean energy - and they support the appeal.
David Holtz, an international coordinator with the group, discussed the next steps.
"And the next big hurdle that the tunnel will have will be during the federal permitting process," said Holtz, "so we're going to be focusing on that in the coming days."
Enbridge spokesperson Ryan Duffy said in an email statement that Line 5's safety is exclusively regulated by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
Enbridge maintains that it also conducts internal inspections via an MRI-like tool known as a "pig" that travels the line, recording data on the pipe's thickness and looking for cracks, dents or signs of corrosion.
Holtz said his organization will continue its efforts to make the public and the federal government aware of what needs to be done regarding Line 5.
"The need for the Biden administration," said Holtz, "to take a stand in support of its own climate policy by rejecting the tunnel."
Holtz added that the permitting process, known as the Environmental Impact Study, will be open for public comment - and is set for early next year.
Disclosure: Oil and Water Don't Mix contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Environment, Environmental Justice, Water. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email