One version of the Farm Bill being debated in Congress would cut billions of dollars in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits from agriculture-dependent states, including Iowa and groups fighting hunger in the state are pushing back.

The version of the Farm Bill released by Rep. Glenn Thompson, R-Pa., the House Agriculture Committee Chair, would cut nearly $30 billion in SNAP benefits over the next decade, including $170 million in Iowa, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Luke Elzinga, board chair of the Iowa Hunger Coalition, said based on the projections, the cuts would have a big effect on the most vulnerable people in the state.

"I think that's especially concerning," Elzinga stressed. "Because right now, we have food banks and food pantries across the state that are facing record-breaking demand."

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Thrifty Food Plan, which creates funding formulas for SNAP and other food assistance programs, would also freeze future benefits. Thompson and others have argued their version of the Farm Bill amounts to responsible budgeting and planning.

Elzinga's coalition has tracked numbers showing SNAP benefits are already not enough to keep up with providing the lowest-cost meals in the state and come in about 20% below what it takes to make ends meet at the dinner table.

"We're talking about families getting typically less than $6 a day per person," Elzinga pointed out. "It's really already just not enough to get by. So many people are struggling with higher food prices, housing costs and child care costs."

This is not the final version of the Farm Bill to be debated but Elzinga argued releasing a measure with such major cuts to SNAP benefits is not a good starting point for negotiations. In his view, it creates the perception for Congress, low-income people are not high on the priority list.

Rep. Zach Nunn, R-IA, has been a leading GOP voice on the Farm Bill from his seat on the Agriculture Committee. Nunn, who is widely known for conservative stances on social issues, has come under criticism for saying the farm bill's "nutritional assistance (goes) largely to blue state communities."

Nunn has also previously endorsed steep budget cuts that would impact hunger programs like WIC and SNAP.


get more stories like this via email

One proposed version of the next Farm Bill, introduced by the Republican chair of the House Agriculture Committee, would cut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program by $30 billion over the next decade.

A competing Senate version introduced by the Democratic agriculture committee chair would keep benefits intact.

Carmen Mooradian, senior public policy manager for Hunger Free Colorado, said access to the program is not a partisan issue and it affects rural and urban families.

"SNAP is one of the most effective federal programs that exists to combat food insecurity and poverty," Mooradian asserted. "It's something that is used by Americans throughout this country to weather life's storms."

The House version removes a provision added to the 2018 Farm Bill which allowed benefits to be calculated in a way to consider the most current nutrition science and actual retail food prices. According to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, removing the provision would cut benefits in Colorado by $380 million.

Cutting food benefits may save money in a fiscal year but Mooradian argued it will cost taxpayers far more down the road in health care and other costs associated with poor nutrition. She added the program also contributes billions to state and local economies.

"Every SNAP dollar is returned into the economy," Mooradian pointed out. "It turns into profits for local businesses, for agricultural producers. When we stop investing in SNAP, those communities miss out."

Lawmakers extended the existing Farm Bill last year after failing to agree on a new version. The extension expires at the end of September, weeks before the General Election. Mooradian added there is still time for constituents to tell their representatives in Congress what they think.

"This is the opportunity for the community to really weigh in about the two proposals that are on the table," Mooradian urged. "And the impact that they will have on households if they pass."

The latest Maryland School Breakfast Report finds tens of thousands fewer kids are being served post COVID.

The end of pandemic era waivers two years ago saw schools revert to tiered systems of free or reduced-price meals based on household income. In turn, despite a slightly larger student population, the 2022-23 school year saw the average number of breakfasts served in a day fall by nearly 39,000, and saw 65,000 fewer lunches served, compared with 2020-21.

LaMonika Jones, interim director of Maryland Hunger Solutions, said reducing the reach of school meals, especially breakfast, takes a toll in the classroom.

"It's challenging for a student at any age to sit in the classroom and focus on what the teacher is trying to share when they're hungry. I understand the argument that it takes away from instruction, but the distraction of being hungry also takes away from instructional time," Jones explained.

The report shows the total number of breakfasts served in the state overall fell by more than 6.5 million in 2022 versus the year prior.

The report identifies barriers to school breakfast participation, including cost, time and the stigma associated with being on a free meal program.

Schools with at least 40% of students qualifying for free or reduced-price meals can opt-in to the state-funded Maryland Meals for Achievement program, which offers free breakfast to all students. While traditional school breakfasts are served in the cafeteria before class, Jones says MMFA is an alternative breakfast model that offers greater flexibility.

"Our students are able to either have 'grab and go' style, which works really well for our older students, or for our little ones, we're able to have breakfast in the classroom. And having those alternative models in place, as well as the funding to cover the cost of these alternative models, ensures that we're meeting that need," she continued.

This past year saw 588 schools participate in MMFA, up from 485 in 2019.


get more stories like this via email

School children in Arkansas are learning how to grow their own fruits and vegetables through the Farm to School and Early Childhood Education program offered by the Arkansas Department of Agriculture.

Across the state, 350 gardens serve as outdoor classrooms at schools and early childhood development centers. Teachers said tending to the gardens helps students with their decision-making, problem-solving and communication skills.

Jessica Chapman, coordinator of the program, said at the same time, students are learning about food, nutrition and agriculture.

"This can involve inviting a local farmer to visit the classroom for a discussion," Chapman explained. "We can help them create a taste test for the students to try a local fruit or vegetable, or we can help them by giving them the resources that they need to integrate farm to school concepts into their subjects."

Some items grown in the school gardens are used in cafeterias, and pantries. Four-H programs across the state also sell some of the produce to raise money for their program.

The Farm to School concept was started in Arkansas in 2019 and has been instrumental in getting locally grown food items into schools and connecting local farmers with the school districts. Farmers and school nutritionists recently met to discuss plans for future collaborations.

Chapman pointed out building relationships not only supports the local farmers and the economy but ensures children have access to locally sourced, nutritious foods.

"They were four regional events and we had them, one in Fayetteville, one in Batesville, one in Hope and one in Central Arkansas," Chapman outlined. "That was to directly link those school nutrition staff with the local producers and the goal was to boost the number of Arkansas school districts that purchase directly from a farmer."

According to the agriculture department, currently more than 35 school districts or early childhood education facilities in Arkansas purchase their food locally and almost 30 farmers and local businesses sell to school districts.


get more stories like this via email