North Carolina's business community is alarmed after Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson praised the controversial House Bill 2, known as the "Bathroom Bill," at a private lunch.
The 2016 law required individuals to use bathrooms matching their gender at birth and prevented local nondiscrimination ordinances.
Raleigh business owner David Meeker, whose livelihood depends on tourism, recalled the economic damage HB 2 caused. Now, Meeker and others worry a resurgence of similar policies could cause North Carolina economic harm by driving away potential businesses.
"My development company relies on people and businesses continuing to move to Raleigh and North Carolina and it being a good place to do business," he said. "House Bill 2 negatively impacted that too, and I think we're still feeling some of that impact even now, eight years later."
During its implementation, the bill led several major businesses, including PayPal, to cancel expansions, costing the state nearly $4 billion in lost investments and about 3,000 jobs. The NCAA and NBA also moved major events out of North Carolina. Gov. Roy Cooper repealed the bill in 2017.
Susan Sawin, owner of Island Bookstores on the Outer Banks, echoed these sentiments. She said the fallout from HB 2 hurt businesses such as hers that depend on events and foot traffic.
"All across the state, it was bad for business in 2017-18, and it would be bad for business again," she said. "So, for Mark Robinson to say publicly that the bathroom bill was the 'best thing that ever happened to the state,' it's just a flat-out lie."
With North Carolina twice named "America's Top State for Business" under Cooper, Meeker said he hopes the state continues to maintain that title. He said business owners are urging inclusivity and a focus on making sure the state remains a top destination for business and tourism.
"It is a huge concern to small, medium and big businesses," said Meeker, "and we really do need a governor who's bringing business here and encouraging tourism, versus a governor whose plan would literally be to do the opposite."
The North Carolina Chamber of Commerce has also raised concerns about controversial ideologies and their impact on the business climate in the state.
get more stories like this via email
Solving North Dakota's child-care crisis is taking another turn, with adoption of a new tax credit.
The incentive is geared for employers who make contributions toward their employee's child-care costs.
Gov. Kelly Armstrong has signed a bill that allows employers to claim a tax credit of 50%, for child-care stipends they might offer as part of a benefits package.
Bill supporters say it might convince more businesses to meet the needs of staff members with young kids.
Bill Bauman, CEO of the Missouri Valley Family YMCA in Bismarck, said he hopes it'll be effective in removing stress on the child-care system by keeping parents in the workforce.
"It's so vital to our economy," said Bauman, "our community, our workforce and our families."
The YMCAs are collectively the largest provider of child-care services in North Dakota, and Bauman said they've seen progress in closing gaps based on 2023 investments from the state.
Other organizations such as the Chamber of Commerce agree that previous steps have helped.
But officials note some solutions have limitations, pointing to age and income eligibility levels under the Working Parents Child Care Relief Program.
Bauman credited policymakers for continuing to monitor how these efforts are playing out, and whether they need to try something new.
He suggested it's going to take additional time to measure the effectiveness of new programs and incentives.
"Some are highly utilized and others maybe not as utilized," said Bauman, "so you have to be able to adjust."
According to a 2024 North Dakota business survey from the Chamber of Commerce, 69% of respondents indicated that child care was an issue for their organization.
A similar percentage indicated support for this type of incentive to help recruit and retain workers.
get more stories like this via email
Thousands are expected to rally in Harrisburg on Monday for a "Raise the Wage and Immigrant Rights Day of Action."
More than 47,000 Pennsylvania workers earn the minimum wage of $7.25 an hour or less.
Jarrett Smith, legislative director for the Service Employees International Union, said Pennsylvania hasn't raised its minimum wage in more than 15 years, while more than 30 other states and Washington, D.C., have all moved toward $15 an hour.
Smith said this makes it harder for the state to stay competitive.
"We are demanding that we raise the wage in Pennsylvania to $15 an hour," he said, and "that we include a cost-of-living adjustment so that we don't have to keep coming back, year after year."
Smith said the coalition Pennsylvania Stands Up is leading the protest, backed by labor and community groups and some lawmakers.
Two years ago, the House passed a bill to raise the state minimum wage to $15 by 2026, but the Senate hasn't acted. Smith said Gov. Josh Shapiro has pointed out it could bring in up to $60 million a year in tax revenue.
Smith said it's key to distinguish low-wage from minimum-wage workers. Nearly 1.2 million Pennsylvanians earn wages less than $15 an hour, and many are single moms. He added that these workers often support families, pushing the state to cover gaps with programs such as SNAP and Medicaid.
"When we talk about how do we actually lift workers out of poverty," he said, "one of the things that you can do is raise that floor and give families the financial independence to actually earn a wage that's going to allow them to not have to make decisions between paying a grocery bill or getting health care."
Smith noted that Pennsylvania is losing workers to neighboring states with higher minimum wages, making it hard to keep a strong workforce.
"We are one of the fastest-shrinking states in the Northeast," he said. "New Jersey, across the border, they have a $15 minimum wage to start, and they're already increasing it for certain workforces, like health care and education."
He added that SEIU represents around 80,000 service workers in the state, across industries such as government, health care and food service. The union is also negotiating its first national Starbucks contract.
get more stories like this via email
New national rankings out this week show South Dakota jumped a few spots higher in teacher pay for each state. However, there are questions about whether the shift will be temporary.
The National Education Association puts South Dakota at 46th in the U.S. for compensation offered to educators around the state. The current rank is the highest South Dakota has achieved since reporting began. Teachers in the state now earn an average salary of more than $56,000.
Loren Paul, president of the South Dakota Education Association, credits higher bumps in state aid the past few years.
"That extra effort from our state gets us out of the bottom rankings," Paul explained. "It also is supportive in recruiting teachers and also retaining teachers in the profession."
In this year's legislative session, education got a smaller funding increase of 1.25%, falling behind inflation. Paul cautioned it could mean South Dakota will slide back in future rankings. The smaller bump came as part of a "belt tightening" mood at the State Capitol this year, with uncertainty over federal funding and declines in sales tax revenue.
Educators said they understand the budget challenges facing South Dakota but Paul contended taking the foot off the accelerator only puts the state in a troubling pattern it has been trying to shake off.
"It has to be year after year," Paul stressed. "It's not a, 'Oh, we're going to address this for a year or two, and then we're going to fall back into very small increases,' or no increases, or actually going backwards."
He added when shrinking investments cause a state to tumble in rankings, public pressure goes back up because no state wants to be seen as holding the last spot.
The union noted when adjusted for inflation, teachers in many parts of the country still make less than they did a decade ago, and if they cannot afford to cover basic expenses, some will choose to leave the profession.
Disclosure: The South Dakota Education Association contributes to our fund for reporting on Education. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email