Black women are ramping up their political organizing efforts in Virginia and other swing states across the country.

It's a key demographic for Democrats, who have been galvanized by the presidential nomination of Vice President Kamala Harris.

Shakya Cherry-Donaldson - executive director of the group One Thousand Women Strong - said in a webinar that voter turnout has dropped among Black women, particularly in 2022.

But this year could be a game changer.

"When budgets are decided, when bills are passed, when bills are struck down, where we decide where our foreign dollars are gonna go," said Cherry-Donaldson, "Black women have to be a part of every part of this process, and our well-being has to be considered."

Cherry-Donaldson was part of a recent video call with 44,000 participants rallying for Harris.

The group also raised $1.6 million in a few hours.

One Thousand Women Strong is targeting more than a half dozen states - including Virginia - for its get out the vote efforts.

Nationally, Harris has a narrow lead over former President Donald Trump, according to a Reuters-Ipsos poll.

More than 90% of Black women voters cast ballots for Joe Biden in 2020, and African Americans are the largest racial minority in Virginia.

That means it will be critical for Harris to boost Black turnout if she wants the state to remain blue.

Trump recently questioned how long Harris has identified as Black, in comments that have drawn widespread criticism - and some puzzlement.

Cherry-Donaldson said pay equity and healthcare access will be critical issues this election cycle.

"We're at the bottom of every social wellness indicator in this country, period," said Cherry-Donaldson. "And I know until that is rectified, we are not talking about our fullest selves. So, Black women, for me, are central in imagining what this country can be."

One Thousand Women Strong is running programs for voter registration, digital organizing and leadership development this fall.

Republicans are also working to gain support, particularly from younger voters of color, through messages about illegal immigration and the economy.




get more stories like this via email

A new report highlighted how the U.S. compares globally in disenfranchising people based on criminal convictions.

The study analyzed 136 countries and found most countries do not deny voting rights due to convictions.

Trey Walk, democracy researcher and advocate for Human Rights Watch and the report's co-author, said it makes the U.S. one of the strictest in denying rights for justice-impacted citizens. He explained what other countries are doing to ensure voting rights are eventually restored.

"There are countries that have time-bound restrictions, so they may remove the right to vote during incarceration," Walk pointed out. "Immediately upon release, those rights are restored."

He noted other countries impose temporary voting restrictions, removing the right to vote for a few years before restoring it. Only five countries have permanent disenfranchisement. Overall the U.S. bans more than 4.4 million citizens from voting due to felony convictions.

The report also highlighted felony disenfranchisement laws as major obstacles to justice for communities of color. In North Carolina about 83,000 people are disenfranchised. Walk argued it is important for democracy people regain the right so they can have a say in issues affecting them.

"Having more people who have been impacted by a criminal legal system and just more people who fully represent the community have the right to vote, that decides outcomes and that allows us to elect candidates who will uphold our rights," Walk contended.

To overcome some of the current barriers, the report recommended measures such as changing laws to make voting more accessible and creating polling centers in correctional facilities to improve access. The report also urged the U.S. to abolish "pay to vote" practices, which require payment of court fees and fines before voting rights can be restored.


get more stories like this via email

A new South Dakota law will give poll watchers in the state more power on Election Day. Some say that could interfere with voting.

A bill passed in March requires that polling places be arranged so that poll watchers - who are sometimes nominated by political parties - may 'plainly see and hear what is done in the polling place.'

A violation by a poll worker - a nonpartisan local trained for the role - is now a class two misdemeanor.

Andrew Garber - counsel for the Voting Rights and Elections Program at the Brennan Center for Justice - said while poll watchers are important, giving them disproportionate power could lead to voter intimidation, poll worker harassment, and misinformation.

"When poll workers can be subject to criminal penalties, it means that poll watchers are going to feel empowered to push the boundaries," said Garber. "And in some cases, people are no longer going to want to serve as poll workers if they're more likely to face harassments or fear criminal prosecution."

Garber said it can also slow down voting and vote counting. The Republican National Committee says increased monitoring ensures transparency.

Other voting laws passed this year - according to the Brennan Center - include seven restrictive laws in six states, and 14 expansive laws across 11 states.

Two out of three Americans are concerned about political violence following Election Day, according to a recent survey.

Garber said it's important for voters to know that interference is possible, but it's unlikely.

"The reality is most voters will have a really positive voting experience," said Garber. "They shouldn't be worried that someone is going to come out and intimidate them or make things very difficult."

In the small chance of a disruption, Garber said voters should report it to election officials.

Support for this reporting was provided by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.




get more stories like this via email

Newly introduced federal legislation aims to protect voters from the growing threat of political ads generated by artificial intelligence.

Manipulated audio of Vice President Kamala Harris' voice spread widely on social media is just the latest example of a so-called "deepfake" designed to sow confusion ahead of the November election.

Richard Anthony, emerging technologies policy director for the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said disruptive AI content in recent European elections revealed the urgent need for action.

"Those incidents were just testing grounds for a big, huge torrent coming our way over the next few months," Anthony predicted.

Anthony explained bipartisan legislation would prohibit the use of AI content for certain political ads and require disclaimers on content substantially generated by AI. Robocalls using AI are already illegal, after a misleading "deepfake" of President Joe Biden before the New Hampshire primary.

Lawmakers say without clear regulations, "deepfakes" could be used to distort election results and widen partisan divides. Earlier this year, tech companies signed a pact to voluntarily prevent AI from disrupting democratic elections but Anthony argued it was largely symbolic and failed to commit companies to banning or removing deceptive content.

He stressed it is important voters be aware of bad actors and if they see a political ad, always check its source.

"Definitely do double-takes on any video, any audio file you see or hear online," Anthony urged.

In the absence of federal rules, eighteen states, including New Hampshire, have already passed laws on AI "deepfakes." Bills are pending in six others.

The Federal Communications Commission has also proposed a rule to require clear disclaimers on AI generated political ads in broadcasting. The public can submit comments though Aug. 12.

Support for this reporting was provided by The Carnegie Corporation of New York.


get more stories like this via email