Half a century after the goal was first conceived, Indianapolis and Evansville are now officially connected via an interstate highway.

The I-69 and I-465 interchange is opening this week on the southwest side of Indianapolis, as the sixth and final section between the two cities. Crews broke ground on the I-69 extension in 2008 in southwest Indiana, but the dream of an interstate connecting Evansville to Indianapolis spanned decades.

Gov. Eric Holcomb said the project completes a major economic vision for Indiana.

"The cost of not doing this far exceeded the cost of doing it," Holcomb contended. "This was an investment in us, this was an investment in our future, this was an investment in realizing our potential."

According to the Indiana Department of Transportation, I-69 features more than 26 miles of new interstate, more than 35 new lane miles of local access roads, 39 new bridges and 35 rebuilt or replaced bridges and the elimination of 14 traffic signals. It also reduces travel time from Indianapolis to Martinsville by 11 minutes.

Former Vice President and Gov. Mike Pence spoke at the opening of the highway, telling those in attendance that the project has been dreamed about in Indiana since before the end of World War II.

"It required patience, determination, vision and unwavering commitment," Pence emphasized. "Since 1944, I'm told, citizens, transportation planners, elected officials always looked forward to this day."

Crews are working on the finishing touches. I-69 now runs continuously from the Canadian border to Evansville. It will eventually go all the way to the Mexican border.


get more stories like this via email

Concerns about environmental and economic disruption by the proposed "Corridor H" four-lane highway project have led dozens of small businesses in two West Virginia towns to call for an alternative route.

The towns of Thomas and Davis cradle Blackwater Falls State Park and are surrounded by state parks, a national forest, two wilderness areas and a national wildlife refuge.

Matt Marcus, manager of Blackwater Bikes in Davis, said he is worried the highway will decrease foot traffic and dollars to independent businesses that are the backbone of the local economy.

"People are coming here to get away from the city and the highways," Marcus contended. "These trails will be negatively affected with the proximity of the road, road noise, the light pollution at night."

Critics of the Corridor H plan said a northern route would avoid the towns and help reduce the effects of a highway. Supporters of the project argued it will open up remote areas in Grant, Hardy and Tucker counties to economic development and boost travel into West Virginia from other states.

Linda Reeves, owner of The Studio Gallery in Thomas, recently signed a letter along with other business owners, expressing deep concerns about the economic impact of the proposed 10-mile Corridor H route. She said she has watched the region blossom since she opened her business in 2010.

"Things were pretty depressed here," Reeves recounted. "Then people came in and saw the possibilities and the beauty of these two towns and the charm of them, and started to revitalize, rent out spaces and start businesses and did very well."

Marcus added the state's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the project has not been publicly released but he anticipates it will be under review by the Federal Highway Administration.

"Our letter to Pete Buttigieg, we have not received an answer from that yet," Marcus emphasized. "Although we are hopeful, because the Secretary of Transportation has stated that he does not want to see communities divided by the highways."

The towns are adjacent to the Blackwater River, flagged earlier this year by the group American Rivers as one of the country's most endangered waterways. It cited threats from the Corridor H project, including construction pollution, unearthing acid mine drainage into headwater streams and disrupting wildlife habitat.


get more stories like this via email

Massachusetts will receive close to $1 billion in federal funding to replace the Cape Cod bridges.

Lawmakers said it is the largest single bridge funding grant in U.S. history and the biggest federal grant ever awarded to the Commonwealth.

Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healy called it game-changing for the state's economy.

"It is a turning point truly in terms of sustained investments in an infrastructure whose benefits will be felt for generations," Healy emphasized. "It's a victory that we celebrate today."

The nearly 90-year-old Sagamore and Bourne bridges provide the only routes on and off the Cape and are considered "functionally obsolete" despite carrying more than 30 million vehicles each year. Healy explained plans are to focus first on replacing the Sagamore Bridge before turning to the Bourne.

The Biden Administration's Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which established the Bridge Investment Program, invests a total of $40 billion over five years to help ensure the nation's most important bridges remain safe and operational. Already, the law has funded more than 7,000 bridge projects nationwide.

Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass., said it feels like "Christmas in July," with the bridge project set to create some 9,000 construction jobs.

"We're going to do this with union labor," Markey pointed out. "It is going to be one of the largest union projects in Massachusetts history."

Markey noted an additional $700 million dollar state investment will allow construction on the Sagamore Bridge to begin. It is projected to be completed sometime in 2034 with the Bourne Bridge replacement completed more than a year later. The new bridges would be built next to the old ones to avoid traffic disruptions during construction.

Last week, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee heard testimony on the state and federal response to the collapse of the Key Bridge. In addition to a recap of the cleanup efforts, testimony turned to bridge replacement and who is paying for it.

Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., and Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., introduced the Baltimore Bridge Response Invests and Delivers Global Economic Relief Act, in which the federal government would fund 100% of the replacement of the bridge and its approaches. Cardin said the money is needed immediately.

"We are asking for the 100%, because that's what we've done in the past and we need it now," Cardin emphasized. "Because we are lending contracts to start the construction now. We don't want to delay this. Every month it's delayed is additional loss to our communities, and frustration among drivers, not only those that are directly impacted by the port, but those that are using our streets."

The legislation requires any funds recovered from insurance proceeds or as compensation for damages be used to reduce the federal government outlay. The current estimate to replace the bridge is $1.7 billion.

The Maryland Transportation Authority is evaluating proposals from design-build teams and expects to have a team chosen by mid- to late summer. Senators in the committee focused on safety upgrades to protect bridge piers against collisions from Neo-Panamax size ships such as the container ship Dali.

Paul J. Wiedefeld, Maryland transportation secretary, said designers will ensure pier protection.

"Whether it's through islands or actually moving the piers further apart," Wiedefeld explained. "If you put these piers much further apart, obviously, that's a natural protection. That'll be played out through the design as a high priority."

The bridge rebuild completion target is fall 2028.


get more stories like this via email