New survey results from AARP shed some light on the top concerns of Michigan seniors and how these issues are likely to shape their voting decisions in the November election. Voters 50 and older will be the decisive force in the battle for Congress, with higher turnout and motivation than younger voters, especially in battleground states like Michigan.

Jeff Liszt, partner at Impact Research, a Democratic public opinion firm, underscored that a significant portion of older voters will be living on fixed incomes, making Social Security a critical issue.

"Sixty-one percent said that it is, or will be, a major source of income for them; another 29% said it that it will be at least a minor source of income," he said. "So, you've got 90% of voters over 50 who are going to depend on Social Security, or are depending on Social Security."

Another key issue for Michiganders over 50 is caregiving. More than one third of Michigan women in this age group are providing care for at least one family member or friend with a health condition or disability.

Family caregivers currently lean Republican by 11 points. Pollsters say Democrats can appeal to them by supporting programs that encourage independent living, while Republicans can maintain their lead by addressing this issue.

Bob Ward, partner at Fabrizio Ward, a Republican public opinion research firm, noted this is a big issue that unites voters across party lines.

"We have data in the survey that shows that candidates who are willing to promote policies that support family caregivers - like tax credits for out-of-pocket expenses, or paid leave - these are policies that are supported by Republicans, Independents and Democrats," he explained.

Ward noted that voters over 50 will make up about 55% of the electorate in this year's presidential election. He also highlights a gender gap in the survey, with women strongly favoring Vice President Kamala Harris and men leaning toward former President Donald Trump, both by double-digit margins.

Newly released polling shows Vice President Kamala Harris holds a narrow lead or is tied with former President Donald Trump in six of the seven battleground states - and in Arizona, Harris now leads by two points. The Harris-Walz campaign has been riding what some are calling a wave of momentum. The duo drew more than 15.000 people to an arena in Glendale last week.

Corey Woods, Tempe Mayor, spoke at the rally and describes the enthusiasm surrounding the campaign as "electric." He considers the controversial right-wing Project 2025 playbook a threat to much of the progress that's been made.

"We don't want Project 2025 to roll back a lot of the critical infrastructure improvements that have happened under the Biden-Harris administration," Woods said. "I just frankly think it is very dangerous public policy."

Woods is convinced the future of U.S. democracy is at stake in this year's election. He contends the Harris-Walz ticket will work to foster what he calls "a better and more perfect union," something even some Arizona Republicans are standing by.

But former Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey has announced his official endorsement for Trump and U.S. Senate candidate Kari Lake, writing on 'X' that "much is on the line this election year."

Woods points to an unprecedented amount of federal funding that's been overseen by the current administration - dollars he says are making real changes at the local, state and national level. As an example, he says an estimated $16 million grant has been game-changing for the Tempe Streetcar, which is set to expand its reach.

"That $16 million investment, to really make what is currently our existing Tempe-based streetcar into a regional system connecting us to the city of Mesa, is a really critical transportation infrastructure investment that is going to pay dividends for decades, if not hundreds of years to come," Woods declared.

He added those are exactly the types of investments he wants to see prioritized in the future, but he's concerned they could be in jeopardy under a second Trump administration.


get more stories like this via email

When it comes to getting elected to statewide offices, women candidates face a disadvantage, a new study shows. Historically, many women haven't been able to match men's personal financial resources and don't get the big bucks male candidates do from donors.

Kira Sanbonmatsu, senior scholar with the Center for American Women in Politics, said when fewer women are elected to office because they're outspent by male candidates, it can create an underrepresentation of women's issues.

"In past work, we've found that men are much more likely than women to be providing the funds that are fueling state candidates - at the state legislative races, statewide office such as governor," she explained.

New Mexico, ranked sixth in the nation for women state legislative representation, is something of an outlier compared to many other states. Women hold 20 seats in New Mexico's state House of Representatives and five Senate seats for a nearly 44% level of representation.

Data also suggest benefits of incumbency. Within both parties, women incumbents have an average higher amount raised than men, although Democratic women and men seeking re-election to the New Mexico state House have raised about the same amount.

"What we've been able to see so far is women can raise even more than men, in some cases - we're seeing that in a lot of that in the data - and this may reflect some differences in the monied networks that men and women have access to," Sanbonmatsu said.

In addition to voting, Sanbonmatsu said people could view giving money to political campaigns as a form of civic participation - especially if they want to see more women elected.


get more stories like this via email

In a debate in the race for Indiana's next Lieutenant Governor, the candidates clashed over the future of the state.

Micah Beckwith, the Republican candidate, who grew up on his family's dairy farm, emphasized agriculture's critical role in Indiana's economy, unveiling what he called the "Braun Beckwith initiative," aimed at reducing government restrictions on farming. He argued food security is national security, and stressed the need for minimal government interference to help farmers succeed.

"It is so important that Indiana begins to be that number one breadbasket," Beckwith stressed. "For the state, for the nation and for the world."

Terry Goodin, the Democratic candidate, focused on education and rural development, calling for reforms to ensure students graduate prepared for the workforce, military service or higher education.

Goodin, who grew up on a family farm, also pushed for economic revival in rural areas and proposed a fair tax plan to ease the burden on Hoosier families and farmers.

"Folks, we're going to start a revival in rural Indiana, an economic revival," Goodin asserted. "We're going to embark on a huge infrastructure program, where these communities will have the ability -- the revival -- of opportunity, hope and optimism."

Tonya Hudson, the Libertarian candidate, championed smaller government and lower taxes.

Hudson, a real estate broker, advocated for abolishing property taxes and reforming the tax code, highlighting the importance of personal freedom and free-market principles.

"I want to live in a free state," Hudson emphasized. "I want my family, my friends, fellow Hoosiers to have the same freedoms I long for. We need better government, not bigger."


get more stories like this via email