As hurricanes, flash floods and other severe weather events become more frequent in North Carolina, accurate and timely weather reports are crucial for public safety.

However, the proposal to privatize weather data in Project 2025 has sparked concerns about what this could mean for North Carolinians, especially in life-threatening situations.

David Kieve, president of Environmental Defense Fund Action, warned the move could have dire consequences.

"The idea that you would just privatize the National Weather Service doesn't just mean that the quality of the forecast that you would see on your evening news would decline," Kieve pointed out. "It also critically means you might not get life-or-death warning to seek shelter at a time when you really need it."

He argued privatization could put essential information behind a paywall, making it harder for residents, especially those in rural or low-income areas, to stay informed and safe.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, most of North Carolina has warmed one-half to one degree in the last century and the sea is rising about one inch every decade.

Kieve argued the project downplays the reality of climate change and its effects. He added it would undermine the ability of agencies such as the Department of Defense to support national security while addressing climate-related threats.

"The reason why American generals, admirals, others have been sounding the alarm about the challenges posed by the climate crisis is not because environmental groups have gotten to them," Kieve stressed. "It's because they've assessed the facts on the ground all around the world and they've determined extreme weather caused by the climate crisis is a problem."

He raised concerns about the project's proposal to replace career civil servants with political appointees, which he believes would further hurt public safety.

Food banks are helping to significantly decrease carbon emissions, according to a new report.

The Global FoodBanking Network's annual impact report found food banks around the world stopped 1.8 million metric tons of carbon emissions last year by preventing food from going to waste in landfills. The Network includes food banks in more than 50 countries.

Rachael Lucille, network communications specialist for Oregon Food Bank, said food waste is the result of food being both inaccessible and unaffordable.

"When we, as in food banks, work with local growers to intercept perfectly good, edible food before it's thrown out, that helps to mitigate harmful greenhouse gas emissions created by food waste," Lucille explained.

Food waste in landfills is a major source of methane, a potent greenhouse gas capturing heat at a higher rate than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period. About one in eight Oregonians faces food insecurity, meaning they are unsure where their next meal will come from.

Carbon emissions from food waste exacerbate climate change, and the impact from there is circular. Lucille pointed out wildfires across Oregon are affecting food production.

"Extreme weather events caused by climate change disrupt food supply chains that lead to increased and unpredictable pricing of food, increased risk of food deserts for the communities that are already facing food insecurity, and fewer fresh fruits and vegetables," Lucille outlined.

One way to fight food waste is through support of small, local agriculture, which Lucille added their organization does through its community producer support project. They emphasized small farmers help fight climate change.

"It contributes to biodiversity, uses sustainable farming practices and keeps food local," Lucille stressed. "Which reduces fossil fuel emissions related to packaging and transportation of food."

Though New York's summer is winding down, climate change's effects remain.

This summer saw record-high temperatures which have only grown in the last decade. Reports show by 2050, the state is projected to experience more days with temperatures above 90 degrees.

Climate activists have been protesting companies contributing to fossil fuel use which leads to worsening climate effects.

Rev. Chelsea MacMillan, New York organizer for the nonprofit GreenFaith, said New York's climate changes resemble the national trend.

"Last year, the skies turned orange due to wildfire smoke coming down from Canada," MacMillan recounted. "We are going to see more and more of these climate disasters happening in our state and in New York City."

While extreme heat is one of the deadliest elements of climate change, storm damage is one of the costliest. Hurricane Beryl was one of several storms to flood many New York communities this year. All told, New York has seen around $23 billion in damage from "billion-dollar disasters" this year. Taxpayers were forced to pick up the $2 billion price tag for climate change costs in 2023 alone.

The Climate Change Superfund Act would require companies who've contributed to climate change to bear some adaptation infrastructure investment costs.

MacMillan and other activists are protesting banks financing fossil fuel projects. She said Citibank is one of the biggest contributors.

"Citibank has poured almost $400 billion into oil, gas, and coal companies since the Paris Climate Accords in 2016," MacMillan pointed out. "This is just unconscionable, like there's no way we can meet any of our climate goals if we keep putting money into fossil fuels."

While Citibank has been the top financier of expansion for fossil fuel companies since 2016, JPMorgan Chase contributed the most financing to fossil fuel companies last year. Since the Paris Climate Accord, JPMorgan Chase has invested more than $430 billion in fossil fuel projects and companies.

From government planners to farmers to residents, those wondering how climate change will affect Minnesota in the decades to come can now get the information at their fingertips. Officials behind a new tool say it can help with certain types of planning.

The University of Minnesota Climate Adaptation Partnership recently launched the interactive digital tool called MN CliMAT. Users can map out predictions, such as how much snow cover would be lost during the winter by 2060, based on scenarios involving greenhouse gas emissions.

Nate Meyer, acting interim director of the University of Minnesota Climate Adaptation Partnership, said they want to help the public make informed decisions when looking ahead.

"If someone is wondering when they might want to replace their roof with something like a fortified roofing system, one way that they can gather information to answer that question is to use these climate projections," Meyer explained.

The user can see how the immediate area surrounding a structure would become more susceptible to heavy rain events. Another example is the agricultural industry getting a sense of future soil health, helping farmers plan for strategies to make their land more climate resilient.

Meyer pointed out the service, which is free, can also be a great resource for those tasked with protecting towns and cities from the worst effects of climate change.

"We are working with a number of regulatory agencies and policymakers right now on strategies to help them select data that are most useful for their purposes," Meyer noted. "Then fold those data into the models that they need to use for those planning purposes."

In a state known for its outdoor recreation, project leaders said the data can benefit Minnesota's tourism industry if stakeholders know about things like future swings in lake temperatures. Since its launch, Meyer said the tool has garnered more than 50,000 views.


get more stories like this via email