Recent Minnesota policy moves are in the national spotlight, with Gov. Tim Walz on the Democratic presidential ticket.
Rural areas within the state are assessing high-profile law changes and program funding.
Minnesota's adoption of free school lunches for all students, has been a major focal point since Gov. Walz became the Democratic nominee for Vice President.
Former Bridgewater Township Supervisor Kathleen Doran-Norton said universal lunches and a new child-tax credit are helping families from smaller towns and cities experiencing poverty.
She said some of the challenges felt statewide do resonate in rural areas.
"All of these," said Doran-Norton, "what we might think of as separate issues, sort of, are interconnected."
But she painted the lack of childcare access as a crisis unfolding in rural communities, and said it hurts employee recruitment for businesses.
Last year, Minnesota set aside $300 million for early childhood initiatives. And a new Paid Family and Medical Leave program starts in 2026.
The Walz administration and Democratic leaders have faced scrutiny for using a significant portion of a record surplus for these investments.
It's unclear just how much these programs and added support will propel Minnesota's small-town landscape.
Doran-Nortan said she's hopeful, but indicates policymakers still have a lot of work to do, including healthcare access.
"We're seeing rural clinics and hospitals close," said Doran-Norton. "I think in Northern Minnesota, [an] area the size of Massachusetts does not have OBGYN care."
During her time as township supervisor, Doran-Nortan said she realized the need for rural areas to make themselves more climate resilient - conveying the importance of bigger agencies helping with things like flood mitigation.
However, Midwestern states like Minnesota are considering carbon capture projects that feature underground pipelines.
These ventures, fueled by federal incentives, are creating conflict in rural areas over public safety and landowner rights issues.
get more stories like this via email
The American Postal Workers Union is pushing back against proposed changes to the Postal Service they said would slow delivery.
Among other things, the proposal aims to cancel afternoon deliveries and pick-ups for areas more than 50 miles from a regional hub. Postmaster General Louis DeJoy said elimination of night pickups could save the post office more than $3 billion a year.
Daniel Cortez, director of industrial relations for the Oregon Postal Workers union, said reducing services does not make sense financially.
"To think that eliminating services, reducing standards, basically providing the American people with less reliable service is somehow going to make money, it's nonsense," Cortez contended.
The charges are the most recent in a series included in Dejoy's 10-year "Delivering for America" plan. The union said DeJoy, who was appointed under President Donald Trump, has already raised prices for stamps while closing post offices across the country, especially in rural communities.
Cortez noted although rural communities would be hit hardest by this latest proposal, urban centers will also be affected. He explained the Postal Service has been shutting down processing centers in the state, making Portland the sole distribution site for all of Oregon, which means more mail delays for everyone, including Portlanders.
"If the clerks and the employees in the main plant are processing mail for the rest of the region, that means they're not at that same time processing Portland's mail," Cortez emphasized.
The changes come as first class mail volume has fallen 30% in a decade, with fierce next-day delivery competition. Although the Postal Service said under the new proposal most first class mail will not be affected, Cortez argued management is already failing to meet its lowered delivery standards from 2021. He added mail never used to sit around.
"First class mail was always moving until it got to where it needed to go," Cortez recounted. "That's just what everybody understood about the service that we're required to provide to the American people."
Disclosure: The American Postal Workers Union contributes to our fund for reporting on Consumer Issues, and Livable Wages/Working Families. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
North Dakota has 30 available workers for every 100 open jobs. To help confront workforce shortages, the state is now accepting grant applications to kick-start solutions at the local level.
The Department of Commerce's Regional Workforce Impact Program invites towns, cities and their business development groups to seek out the grants.
Arik Spencer, president and CEO of the Greater North Dakota Chamber of Commerce, said providing seed money to foster innovation in worker recruitment might boost rural areas at a competitive disadvantage.
"Whether it is starting manufacturing ventures or doing other creative things," Spencer outlined. "To the extent that this can help those, maybe, small communities or underserved communities get people to move there and bolster their workforce, we think that's a positive outcome."
Spencer pointed out the innovation might look like closing affordable housing gaps, which he said is a common roadblock around the state. He and other stakeholders monitoring the labor landscape still hope for broader support when the Legislature reconvenes early next year. North Dakota's labor shortage woes appear to be more pressing than its neighboring states.
Spencer noted no matter the size of the community, applicants appear to be in the driver's seat in coming up with fixes that work for their populations.
"While living in Fargo may be attractive to some people, maybe living in Watford City's attractive to others," Spencer acknowledged. "This grant program allows those regional communities to figure out their own solutions and tackle those with the support of the state."
The application period began this week and runs through Jan. 21. There are grant caps for certain categories. For example, a local coalition focused on recruiting talent can receive a grant of up to $250,000. The cap is higher for infrastructure needs related to worker recruitment, such as child care centers.
get more stories like this via email
Groups from across Michigan are sounding the alarm on the effect Republican-backed policies would have on people in rural parts of the state.
In a recent webinar by the group Progress Michigan, leaders say policies laid out in Project 2025 are in stark opposition to the needs facing rural Michiganders. Representatives from Indigenous tribes, public school teachers and family farmers gave their views on the potential changes if the GOP regains power.
Dakota Shananaquet, member of the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa, said she fears for her people's basic rights.
"The Project 2025 Agenda is a right-wing power grab that would harm Indigenous communities, our sovereignty and the ability for us to exercise our vote," Shananaquet asserted. "It would make outcomes worse by defunding health care and education programs."
Project 2025 is a 900-page document outlining plans for a conservative takeover of the federal government. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has disavowed any part in developing the document. However, dozens of former Trump administration officials contributed to the proposals.
Bob Thompson, president of the Michigan Farmers Union, which represents hundreds of small and medium-family farms, said the GOP plans to eliminate programs helping independent farmers implement conservation and clean energy goals, and most of the federal farm program's current financial safety net features.
"Family farmers operate on narrow margins and need the protection of many of the very programs that Project 2025 seeks to eliminate," Thompson explained. "Most elements stand against what rural folks want for our families and our future here in Michigan."
Gary Wellnitz, Northern Michigan field representative for the American Federation of Teachers-Michigan, said Project 2025 would have negative and destructive effects on public schools across the state.
"It's going to make the safety in our public schools far worse," Wellnitz contended. "We're going to see small schools closing down, We're going to see teachers losing jobs by the thousands if this were to take hold."
get more stories like this via email