Oregon voters will decide on a potential change to the state's electoral system in November.

If passed, Measure 117 would create a ranked choice voting system in federal and statewide elections and give cities and counties the ability to adopt the voting system as well.

Melanie Billings-Yun, chair of the ranked choice voting team for the League of Women Voters of Portland, said the system would replace primaries with a single ballot where voters would rank several candidates based on their preference. She pointed out some candidates initially deemed "unelectable" could benefit.

"I certainly have felt that way back in previous elections," Billings-Yun recounted. "Is it safe for me to vote for this candidate? Would she be unelectable? What we've found is that ranked choice voting opens the door to many more women and people of color to be elected."

Ranked choice voting has already been adopted in some localities in Oregon, including Benton County, which adopted the method in 2020, and Portland, which will have its first ranked-choice election this year. Opponents argued the system would be too confusing or complicated for voters.

A report from 2020 found nearly half of the winners nationally in local races under ranked choice voting systems were women, compared to less than a quarter in jurisdictions without ranked choice voting.

Billings-Yun pointed out other advantages to the system could include changing the tenor of politics in the state.

"It discourages negative campaigning and favors candidates who find common ground," Billings-Yun emphasized. "This has become such a problem across our nation but really also in our state where we're seeing sometimes that the whole government grinds to a stop because the sides are in such high opposition."

In the 2023 session, lawmakers approved the vote on the ballot change this November. Billings-Yun added there is another way to described ranked choice.

"In some cases it's called instant transfer so that if their candidate is eliminated their next choice would be considered to be their vote," Billings-Yun explained.


get more stories like this via email

The highly anticipated debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris is tonight, and as Election Day inches closer, more attention is being placed on the role tossup states like Nevada will play.

Harris has launched an "issues" page on her campaign website, outlining a number of her policy decisions and how they differ from Project 2025, the controversial policy playbook issued by a right-wing think tank called the Heritage Foundation. While Trump has tried to distance himself from Project 2025, it has proved to be quite a challenge since many influential Trump loyalists and allies are behind it.

Julie Millican, vice president of Media Matters for America, said the Heritage Foundation has a proven "track record of success."

"They have consistently gotten the majority of their mandates from leadership proposals implemented by incoming Republican administrations, again going back to Reagan," Millican pointed out.

Millican noted in the first year of the Trump administration, the Heritage Foundation touted more than two-thirds of their mandates were enacted under Trump. She emphasized it speaks to why Project 2025 has to be taken seriously, which would revamp or completely eliminate certain federal agencies such as the Department of Education and the National Weather Service.

The debate will be hosted by ABC and will start at 6 p.m. PT.

Millican considers Project 2025 to be what she calls "expansive and extreme," which she said can lead voters to feel overwhelmed. In her perspective, Project 2025 boils down to an agenda of wanting control over many aspects of everyday life.

"There are strict definitions of who it is that can be married," Millican outlined. "There are strict definitions about what women's role is, which is primarily just to have children and raise children, and outside of that they don't have a lot of other worth."

Millican encouraged voters to contrast Project 2025's proposals with their own personal values as it can be an easier and more effective way to determine the impact the playbook could have on the things that matter most to them.


get more stories like this via email

New findings looking at Native American participation in elections show a mixed bag of news but North Dakota outreach leaders said they are coming off a strong summer of civic engagement.

The Native American Rights Fund last month reported national growth trends among tribal populations for voter turnout, including a 14 percentage point increase between 2018 and 2020. Because of long-standing barriers, there is still a significant gap compared with non-Hispanic white voters.

Erika Red Tomahawk, state and tribal policy coordinator for North Dakota Native Vote, said in responding to the concerns, her team connected with attendees at powwows and other gatherings across all reservations in North Dakota.

"There was a lot of meaningful conversations about the importance of voting, with even some individuals expressing that they were going to run for official positions themselves," Red Tomahawk observed. "It was clear that there was a strong desire to participate actively within civic processes."

She is optimistic the energy from the summer celebrations will result in stronger voter turnout this fall. Overall, the group engaged with more than 200 prospective voters, who received information on polling locations and voter ID requirements. Researchers for the group said Native Americans are an untapped political force, with increasing potential to be the deciding factor in certain races.

Red Tomahawk noted their staff did chat with some individuals who felt a disconnect with the voting process. For groups like hers, the conversations are vital because the goal is to assist tribal voters in understanding their voice does matter.

"Indian Country in North Dakota is huge," Red Tomahawk pointed out. "You know, we have relatives everywhere and being able for them to vote and share their voice as a collective to have more representation, it's very important. "

She added electing more candidates with Indigenous roots paves the way for increased economic development in tribal areas.

Amid the lagging turnout gaps, the group stressed there are still misconceptions Native Americans do not vote at all. Organizers will again try to shatter the myth on Sept. 17, National Voter Registration Day. North Dakota does not have voter registration but tribal members will be encouraged to update their identification so they can cast a ballot under the state's ID law.

A common narrative suggests that deeply polarized American voters always support their party's candidates, but a new study suggests otherwise in certain circumstances.

Researchers from Sacramento State and San Diego State universities asked more than 900 partisan voters about housing and homelessness - then asked them to choose, in a hypothetical local election - between a candidate from their party who disagreed with their views, or one from the opposite party who is aligned with them on policy.

Sacramento State Associate Professor of Political Science Danielle Martin co-authored the study.

"Overall, voters do support candidates from their own party - even when an opposite party candidate was closer to their views on one of those salient local issues," said Martin. "But we also found that about 40% defected from their party."

The study found that people with weak party loyalty were more likely to defect, as were people who are very invested in their policy position.

They also found that in national and state-level races, people are much less likely to split their votes between parties.

Study co-author Professor of Public Policy and Administration Ted Lascher, also from Sacramento State, said the data show that voters are more flexible when an issue hits close to home.

"One of the implications is that somebody who's running, who's the out party, in terms of local party identification, may be able to win elections in city council and mayoral races," said Lascher, "if they choose the issue very carefully. Because voters will sometimes cross party lines on particular local issues."

San Diego State University Political Science Professor Brian Adams said this means that even though Democrats enjoy broad support in California, that support is more conditional than absolute in local races.

"A lot of this research suggests that if Republicans put forward candidates that actually agreed with some of the policy positions that Democratic voters have," said Adams, "at least some Democratic voters would be willing to switch."

About 96% of electoral contests in the U.S. are at the local level - for races such as the school board, the city council, and the county board of supervisors.

Support for this reporting was provided by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.




get more stories like this via email