Tensions are rising in Springfield, Ohio, as controversial claims from Sen. J.D. Vance about migrants in the area have garnered national attention.
Vance, the Republican vice presidential nominee, has suggested that migrants have caused significant issues in the community, including allegations of pets being abducted and eaten, a claim that was referenced during Tuesday's presidential debate by former President Donald Trump. While the validity of these claims remains unclear, they have fueled debates surrounding immigration policy.
"This is something that came up on the internet, and the internet can be quite crazy sometimes," said Gov. Mike DeWine. "And look, the mayor, Mayor [Rob] Rue of Springfield, says no, there's no truth in that. They have no evidence of that at all."
While the claims about pets being abducted have not been substantiated, DeWine emphasized that Springfield has faced challenges with a rapid influx of migrants. The city of about 58,000 residents has seen an increase in its Haitian population, with estimates ranging from 15,000 to 20,000 under Temporary Protected Status, fleeing violence in their home country.
While many have filled local labor shortages, concerns about the strain on health-care services and other infrastructure have surfaced.
On the other hand, Vance has doubled down on the claims, arguing that local residents are reporting firsthand accounts of problems caused by the influx of migrants. His comments have sparked a broader conversation about how the media covers these issues and whether local residents' concerns are being taken seriously.
Vance told reporters to "work harder" in an interview following the presidential debate.
"We've heard from a number of constituents on the ground, both firsthand and secondhand reports, saying this stuff is happening," he said, "and I think it's important for journalists to actually get on the ground and uncover this stuff for themselves."
The issue of immigration in Springfield has become a flashpoint, not only for the upcoming election but also for people grappling with rapid demographic changes. Despite concerns about health or safety, many Springfield residents acknowledge the migrant community contributes to the local economy.
As the presidential race amplifies these issues, immigration is likely to remain a key topic as the election approaches.
get more stories like this via email
Former President and 2024 Republican nominee Donald Trump held a Thursday campaign rally in Tucson, his first since this week's debate with Vice President Kamala Harris.
The former president told the crowd the debate was a "victory" for him, but said he won't participate in another one. He thinks it's too late in the election cycle and early voting has already begun in some states.
Since the debate, new polling shows Harris has widened her lead over Trump by five points.
During his speech in Arizona's second-largest city, Trump touched on the economy and the housing crisis - two issues he pledges he'll fix.
"But now, Arizonans are experiencing an affordability crisis, and this is a crisis of historic proportions. Do you agree? You know that," he said. "You know what's going on, in this area in particular. Today not a single, major city in Arizona is considered affordable. Not one."
The Center for the Future of Arizona has found almost 80% of likely voters across political ideologies agree the state needs more affordable housing.
Another key issue is immigration, with 82% of likely voters saying they consider the United States' southern border an international humanitarian crisis. Trump has promised mass deportations, and has said he would use the military to protect the border if elected to a second term.
Celina Padilla lives in Tucson but is originally from the state of Jalisco in Mexico. She attended Trump's rally Thursday and said as an immigrant herself, while his heated rhetoric about immigration does impact her personally, she believes immigration reform is "non-negotiable."
"Every person should enter the United States legally," she said. "Of course, not all of us have done it that way, but now we have the ability to do so correctly and with the help from the presidency."
Like many Trump supporters, Padilla said her life was "better and easier" when he was in office.
Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff was also in Tucson on Thursday, aiming to mobilize support among the Democratic base. Arizona has historically been a "red" state, but President Joe Biden managed to flip the state "blue" in 2020 with fewer than 11,000 votes.
Support for this reporting was provided by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.
get more stories like this via email
A recent study by Vanderbilt University found that Americans generally love free speech, but their views change occasionally. One instance of this occurred during the protests at U.S. universities about the Israel-Hamas war.
John Geer, professor of political science at Vanderbilt University, said the study replicated a 1939 poll that asked about free speech's role in a democracy and people's commitment to free speech. That study involved 3,500 participants. However, in June, only 1,000 Americans were surveyed to compare their current views to those in the past.
"We were interested to see if, in fact, all those protests, for example, it led people lessen or increase their commitment to free speech. And you could imagine hypotheses in both directions," Geer said.
Polling found that most Americans believe in unrestricted free speech, allowing any topic or speaker. However, there's a significant partisan divide, with Republicans more likely than Democrats to oppose any restrictions.
Jacob Mchangama, executive director for The Future of Free Speech and research professor at Vanderbilt University said Americans generally support free speech in abstract terms, but their views become more nuanced when confronted with specific hot-button topics on issues of transgender, gay marriage and abortion. He added there are also different degrees of tolerance for leaders of Israel and Hamas speaking on college campuses.
"If you ask whether a white supremacist should be allowed to speak on college campuses, only 37% say yes. A supporter of critical race theory, you get a majority, a significant majority of 66%, but that's still quite a few Americans who believe that someone who supports critical race theory should not be allowed to speak on college campuses," he explained.
Mchangama added that tolerance for opposing ideas is crucial for free speech, and the survey provides valuable data on this civic commitment. While most people support free speech, a significant minority would not tolerate opposing views, even when they are nonviolent and protected by the First Amendment.
get more stories like this via email
Politicians not listening to voters is a top concern for Utahns, and one Utah Democratic representative agrees with that sentiment.
Rep. Jennifer Dailey-Provost, D-Salt Lake City, said while many of the issues politicians deal with are nuanced and not as black and white as they might seem, the Utah state Legislature "has continued to grow its own power relative to the other branches of government."
"Putting things on the ballot like the gutting of the ballot initiative that created the redistricting commission and doing so with extremely dishonest and misleading language, really pushes that narrative that the Legislature just is not listening to the will of the people," she explained.
Earlier this year, the Utah Supreme Court ruled the state Legislature had overstepped its authority regarding Utah's Independent Redistricting Commission, which was born out of a 2018 ballot initiative that bans gerrymandering.
Following the court's rule, the GOP controlled Legislature convened a special session to create a constitutional amendment giving it the power to modify future ballot measures - that'll be put to voters this November. Instead, Dailey-Provost contends policymakers should do better in facilitating discussions with those who propose ballot measures to try to find what she calls common ground.
Dailey-Provost contends politicians get a bad rap and adds it is not entirely undeserved. In 2018, in addition to the creation of the redistricting commission, voters also approved ballot measures legalizing medical marijuana and expanding Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, all of which were later altered by the Utah Legislature.
Dailey-Provost said following those alterations, nothing happened electorally like she would have expected.
"There is something to be said for people criticizing vocally, but when the rubber hits the road, if people are truly dissatisfied with the job that politicians are doing, why are they continually being re-elected?" she continued.
Dailey-Provost wants voters to think about what it means to be dissatisfied with elected officials and the degree to which they're being held accountable moving forward.
get more stories like this via email