New York colleges and universities are seeing the effects of the Supreme Court's decision on affirmative action.
New data from Education Reform Now show schools such as Columbia and Cornell universities saw Black student admissions decline. However, national admissions data has been mixed, as some schools have seen more Black and minority students admitted.
Wil Del Pilar, senior vice president of the Education Trust, said schools need to re-evaluate what they value in admissions.
"Institutions need to really alter what they value most in admissions," Del Pilar emphasized. "Then think about, like, what are the necessary attributes of successful students, not what are the attributes that we value in admissions that overwhelmingly tend to prioritize wealthier white students."
He noted some schools are masking or underreporting their admissions data by providing a percentage of minority students without breaking it down by race and ethnicity. Before the Supreme Court's decision, nine states banned affirmative action in college admissions. Many studies show those states saw an increase in racial disparities in admissions and fewer minority students enrolling.
Since affirmative action ended, higher-education advocates want schools and states to end legacy admissions. Four states have banned legacy admissions with states such as New York introducing legislation to do the same.
Del Pilar argued despite ad hoc measures to end legacy admissions, it is not going away so quickly.
"When you have established power, you're not going to release it that easily," Del Pilar observed. "Those who have the opportunity to enroll at these institutions are going to try and maintain those policies."
He added such practices might help schools keep in touch with wealthier families who might be donors. If schools are going to end or re-evaluate legacy admissions, Del Pilar feels it is worth looking at athletic preferences. He cited the "Varsity Blues" admissions scandal, where athletic recruiting was used as a way to get wealthy students into elite schools.
Support for this reporting was provided by Lumina Foundation.
get more stories like this via email
A program in Washington state helping college students from migrant families is being celebrated for its support of the Latino community.
Washington State University's College Assistance Migrant Program is one of four recognized this year by Excelencia in Education, a research-based organization serving Latino students.
Michael Heim, director of migrant education student access and support at Washington State University, said migrant families often live below the federal poverty level. He explained the program supports students and families who mostly have experience working in farm fields.
"They need the support system and maybe a little bit of financial help through a scholarship for participating in the programs," Heim pointed out. "And just the attention that first gen students coming from minoritized backgrounds, marginalized backgrounds might not normally receive."
The other three programs recognized this year by Excelencia in Education are at Reading Area Community College in Pennsylvania, California State University and The Immokalee Foundation in Florida.
The Washington State program has high rates of success for the students it assists. That includes a retention rate of 85% over the past three years and a graduation rate of nearly 70%.
Heim noted each year there are about 50 students in each cohort.
"The results are statistically significant and our students are graduating at higher rates and being retained at higher rates than students who aren't receiving CAMP's services," Heim emphasized.
Heim added the benefits stretch beyond the students in the program.
"Because they've been successful, we've been able to be recognized as having best practices that are worth implementing at other institutions," Heim observed. "And even across just WSU here at home."
Support for this reporting was provided by Lumina Foundation.
get more stories like this via email
Kentuckians head to the polls in a few weeks and on the ballot is Amendment 2, a proposed change to the state Constitution to allow public funds for vouchers to pay tuition at private schools.
A group of county school superintendents across the Commonwealth opposes the measure, arguing it would funnel public dollars to schools with little to no accountability to taxpayers.
Tom Shelton, executive secretary of the group, the Council for Better Education, said other states to have passed similar amendments have a track record showing they worsen outcomes for students, widen inequality gaps and cause already struggling public schools to cut resources and staff.
"That's actually the main reason we oppose this issue," Shelton explained. "The data that we've seen from other states is clear that this is bad policy."
According to the Kentucky Center for Economic Policy, Amendment 2 would hit the state's poorest rural areas the hardest, communities where public schools are also large employers. Supporters of the ballot measure argued it would increase opportunities for school choice for parents who could not otherwise afford private schools.
Shelton pointed out Kentucky's public schools are woefully underfunded and have stayed afloat despite a $2 billion budget shortfall since the mid 2000s. He added voucher money for private schools often does not affect those who need it the most.
"On average, 70-75% of the money goes to students who are already in private schools," Shelton emphasized. "It doesn't really increase private school enrollment and it doesn't take kids out of public schools."
This year alone, legislators in 29 states have proposed 80 bills tied to school vouchers, Education Savings Accounts, refundable tax credits and tax-credit scholarships.
get more stories like this via email
The cost of a graduate degree tripled between 2000 and 2020, according to a new report from the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
Yet people in West Virginia and around the country with Master's degrees, law or medical degrees, or Ph.Ds still earn higher incomes than those with other education credentials.
Catherine Morris, senior writer and editor with the center, explained that decreasing state investment in public higher education has led many universities to pass increased costs onto students.
In some cases, because of increased federal financial aid, institutions have raised tuition to get more of the available money.
She added that graduate enrollments, particularly for Master's degrees, are growing.
"Meanwhile," said Morris, "the median debt held by graduate students has increased from $34,000 to $50,000 over the same time period."
The report calls for better regulation of graduate student loans.
It also outlines an in-field earnings premium test and a debt-to-earnings test students can use to help inform them of the risks, pros, and cons of taking on graduate degree debt.
West Virginia has among the highest rates of student loan default in the nation.
For some groups, the data show graduate education worsens existing earnings disparities.
Morris said earnings among Black and Hispanic workers with graduate degrees are $16,000 less than those of all graduate degree workers. And, graduate degrees don't buffer women from the wage gap.
"Medium earnings among women with graduate degrees is $85,000," said Morris, "For men, it's $119,000 - and this is particularly significant because women currently make up the majority of graduate degree holders."
Morris added that she doesn't believe debt - even high levels of it - are concerning.
"The bigger question is whether graduates can pay off that debt on their expected earnings," said Morris, "while still working towards traditional markers of success, such as, owning a home or starting a family."
Seventy four percent of Gen Z student loan borrowers and 68% of millennials say they delayed a major financial life decision as a result of their debt, according to a survey by Bankrate.
Support for this reporting was provided by Lumina Foundation.
get more stories like this via email