A recent study from the Sierra Club found people in Brookfield, Connecticut, could face severe effects from a proposed compressor station expansion.
The pipeline's owners conducted their own health study but the Sierra Club said it was flawed and did not account for several factors. The new study showed people nearby will face higher fine particulate matter emissions and many other noxious gases, like carbon monoxide.
Kerry Swift, a longtime Brookfield resident, said it began with one compressor station back in 2006.
"The next year they put in for two and now they want four," Swift explained. "There's these three huge interstate pipelines that are aging and they're putting more and more compressor stations on them; putting more and more gas through them, which they weren't built for."
A major issue Swift and other residents have with the expansion is the emissions will vent 1,900 feet from Whisconier Middle School. The town's elected officials and residents want the state's Department of Energy and Environmental Protection to deny the project's air permits. Along with Brookfield, the village of Athens, New York recently passed a resolution urging Gov. Kathy Hochul to similarly deny air permits for the expansion.
Another concern about the expansion is Connecticut is supposed to cut greenhouse gas emissions 45% by 2030.
Nick Katkevich, campaign organizing strategist for the Sierra Club, noted an electric compressor station could be better for the environment but said blowdowns would still be a problem.
"Basically what's happening is the company needs to release pressure on the pipeline so they'll do it at the compressor facility and basically just shooting huge amounts of fracked gas into the air," Katkevich explained.
The companies have said it would be too expensive to convert the compressor station to electricity. Katkevich added along with committing to air monitoring in Brookfield, the state's energy department should meet with people in town before approving expansion permits. However, the department has declined the invitation for two years.
Disclosure: The Sierra Club contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Energy Policy, Environment, and Environmental Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Programs in North Carolina and across the country are bringing energy efficiency to rural customers without breaking the bank.
Known as Inclusive Utility Investments, the programs provide upgrades at low repayment rates so customers do not go into debt and save money on their energy bills.
Roanoke Cooperative in North Carolina has a program called "Upgrade to $ave," which provides the service.
Susan Williams, community services coordinator for the cooperative, said the loan for upgrades is usually paid back over 12 years.
"Although they may have the added amount, the upgrades bring the amount of the bill down to a point where even adding the tariff to the bill, the member-owner still shows savings," Williams explained. "And their home is more energy efficient."
Rural Americans spend up to 40% more on energy than their urban counterparts, according to the Rural Power Coalition. Utilities in 10 states have invested more than $50 million through Inclusive Utility Investments, with a 99% cost-recovery rate.
The Rural Energy Savings Program and other federal programs make the investments possible for electric cooperatives. Williams pointed out the program has big benefits for the region Roanoke Cooperative serves.
"We have probably three of the poorest counties in North Carolina that we service," Williams observed. "We are always looking for ways to make things better for our members."
Williams noted many of the 14,000 member-owners of Roanoke Cooperative live in substandard housing and the cooperative provides free health and safety upgrades. She added energy efficiency lowers Roanoke Cooperative's bill, as well.
get more stories like this via email
Connecticut groups are rallying today against a natural gas pipeline expansion.
Project Maple would extend Enbridge's natural-gas pipeline stretching from New Jersey to Rhode Island with sections running under Connecticut. Residents' feedback is negative since it would increase statewide energy costs. Gov. Ned Lamont supported natural-gas expansion in his State of the State Address.
Sena Wazer, intern for the Connecticut Chapter of the Sierra Club, said now is not the time for an expansion.
"Right now, we're seeing massive federal rollbacks on climate action and climate progress," Wazer pointed out. "It is really important for our states to step up and to do better. Especially here in New England, many of our states including Connecticut pride themselves on being climate leaders and this is really a step in the wrong direction."
A 2024 Sierra Club report found building up offshore wind energy would save Connecticut residents around $3 a month on their energy bills. While renewable energy projects have higher up-front costs, they lower costs for people in the long run.
If Project Maple does go forward, it will be operational by November 2029. The Sierra Club and other groups are hosting a rally outside Eversource's Hartford headquarters at 3 p.m.
While Connecticut has long been a renewable energy and climate change policy leader, progress on the goals has stagnated in recent years. Wazer feels Lamont's recent recommendation of certain climate bills shows he wants to keep the state's climate goals alive. But she argued he must do more.
"It is not enough to recognize that climate change is impacting us," Wazer contended. "It's also really critical to take action to mitigate the impacts that we are having on climate change."
Reports show Connecticut is behind on achieving its 2030 and 2050 climate goals. The state's Department of Energy and Environmental Protection said accelerating emission reduction projects would help the state make its goals.
Natural gas is Connecticut's largest energy source, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
Disclosure: The Sierra Club contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Energy Policy, Environment, and Environmental Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
On the heels of a regulatory victory, utilities and various energy groups in Minnesota are expressing more optimism about the region's power grid - and its ability to accommodate a diverse set of electricity sources. In late January, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission approved a permit request for the Northland Reliability Project, a new 140-mile transmission line stretching from the Iron Range to the St. Cloud area. Utilities behind the effort say this creates more grid space and ensures reliability as they focus on renewables such as wind and solar.
Rachel Stuckey, executive director of the Minnesota Conservative Energy Forum, says that peace of mind isn't just tied to meeting higher electricity demands.
"If a weather event happens or, God forbid, some kind of cyberattack, that we can either withstand or bounce back from that," she explained.
Her organization favors an "all of the above" approach when it comes to energy sources. Stuckey added that as these grid modernization projects come on board, it's important all voices are heard, including property owners worried about new power lines going up. The Northland project also calls for replacing two 20-mile stretches of existing lines and is scheduled to be ready by 2030.
Amelia Vohs, climate director is with the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, which prioritizes non-fossil fuel sources, says the region can't slow down in trying to modernize the power grid because demand keeps accelerating.
"Some of it [comes] from increasingly electrified appliances, or electric vehicles, but especially from the growth of data centers," she said.
Vohs added that creating more room on the grid eases the backlog of clean-energy development waiting to advance, and that while Minnesota has been a leader in trying to meet these challenges, it remains an open question of whether the state has enough transmission proposals coming together to keep pace. At least three other projects are being looked at by Minnesota regulators.
get more stories like this via email