Rural voters in Colorado and across the U.S. tend to be swing voters, and may decide the outcome of this year's presidential election.
Their biggest concerns are the economy, threats to democracy, and abortion - according to a new Rural Democracy Initiative poll.
Sarah Jaynes - executive director of the initiative - said these voters want elected leaders to make lowering costs and increasing wages for working people a priority, not cutting taxes for the rich or deregulating corporations.
"They're very focused on working people as kind of the heroes of the economy, and concerns that impact working-class people," said Jaynes. "Rural people and small town folks are more likely to be working class. About 70% of rural folks are working class."
Seventy-one percent of rural voters agreed with the statement: "True patriotism is protecting the freedom to live our lives as we choose."
Just 23% agreed that "patriotism is about preserving a traditional way of life." The poll was conducted between August 28 and September 8 in ten battleground states.
Nearly eight in ten rural voters are firmly against banning abortion. Jaynes noted that's the same number pollsters saw in a similar survey in March.
"They either said that they were against abortion themselves, but didn't think that the government should control a woman's choice in the matter," said Jaynes. "Or they just thought that abortion should be legal."
The poll shows Donald Trump with an 18% lead over Kamala Harris among likely rural voters. But that is down from a 26% lead in March, before Harris announced her campaign.
Jaynes said the big takeaway for both major parties should be that rural voters want to see worker-centered policies.
"People want to make sure that they have the tools and the opportunities to create a good life for themselves and their families," said Jaynes. "And that shows up in their support for child care and health care."
Disclosure: Rural Democracy Initiative contributes to our fund for reporting on Environment, Health Issues, Rural/Farming, Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Several rural communities across North Dakota are strategizing how to slow the pace of local grocery stores shutting down.
Some are making use of state grant money to aid their efforts, but challenges remain.
In North Dakota's Walsh County, the Rural Access Distribution Cooperative has been on the leading edge of establishing local grocery store co-ops, where a handful of smaller shops buy items in bulk together.
The initiative was eventually awarded a state grant to buy a bigger truck and van, making supply deliveries more manageable.
Cooperative President Alexander Bata said they continue to see progress with increased sales, and better options for area residents.
"So, there's less waste, less cost," said Bata, "and we've significantly improved the quality of food."
However, other elements of the initiative still face hurdles.
That includes utilizing food lockers, where customers can buy their food online and pick it up when they choose. But Bata said they haven't been able to make the technology work.
In 2023, the Legislature approved $1 million for interested communities to sustain grocery service in smaller towns with limited access.
The town of Milnor, with a population of around 600, was one of the early grantees - and used its money for a feasibility study.
Milnor's Community Economic Development Coordinator Carol Peterson said those findings were clear - their lone grocery store needs more storage space to stay afloat.
"It makes it very hard," said Peterson, "to order in enough product to service the community."
That limits the store from keeping prices lower.
Peterson said she worries more customers will then look at far away options, taking their tax dollars with them. While local leaders did get a read on what's needed, they haven't been able to secure additional funding for the next phase.
A key legislative sponsor of the pilot grant program says there's interest in extending it next session, but she's still gathering feedback.
get more stories like this via email
The American Postal Workers Union is pushing back against proposed changes to the Postal Service they said would slow delivery.
Among other things, the proposal aims to cancel afternoon deliveries and pick-ups for areas more than 50 miles from a regional hub. Postmaster General Louis DeJoy said elimination of night pickups could save the post office more than $3 billion a year.
Daniel Cortez, director of industrial relations for the Oregon Postal Workers union, said reducing services does not make sense financially.
"To think that eliminating services, reducing standards, basically providing the American people with less reliable service is somehow going to make money, it's nonsense," Cortez contended.
The charges are the most recent in a series included in Dejoy's 10-year "Delivering for America" plan. The union said DeJoy, who was appointed under President Donald Trump, has already raised prices for stamps while closing post offices across the country, especially in rural communities.
Cortez noted although rural communities would be hit hardest by this latest proposal, urban centers will also be affected. He explained the Postal Service has been shutting down processing centers in the state, making Portland the sole distribution site for all of Oregon, which means more mail delays for everyone, including Portlanders.
"If the clerks and the employees in the main plant are processing mail for the rest of the region, that means they're not at that same time processing Portland's mail," Cortez emphasized.
The changes come as first class mail volume has fallen 30% in a decade, with fierce next-day delivery competition. Although the Postal Service said under the new proposal most first class mail will not be affected, Cortez argued management is already failing to meet its lowered delivery standards from 2021. He added mail never used to sit around.
"First class mail was always moving until it got to where it needed to go," Cortez recounted. "That's just what everybody understood about the service that we're required to provide to the American people."
Disclosure: The American Postal Workers Union contributes to our fund for reporting on Consumer Issues, and Livable Wages/Working Families. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
North Dakota has 30 available workers for every 100 open jobs. To help confront workforce shortages, the state is now accepting grant applications to kick-start solutions at the local level.
The Department of Commerce's Regional Workforce Impact Program invites towns, cities and their business development groups to seek out the grants.
Arik Spencer, president and CEO of the Greater North Dakota Chamber of Commerce, said providing seed money to foster innovation in worker recruitment might boost rural areas at a competitive disadvantage.
"Whether it is starting manufacturing ventures or doing other creative things," Spencer outlined. "To the extent that this can help those, maybe, small communities or underserved communities get people to move there and bolster their workforce, we think that's a positive outcome."
Spencer pointed out the innovation might look like closing affordable housing gaps, which he said is a common roadblock around the state. He and other stakeholders monitoring the labor landscape still hope for broader support when the Legislature reconvenes early next year. North Dakota's labor shortage woes appear to be more pressing than its neighboring states.
Spencer noted no matter the size of the community, applicants appear to be in the driver's seat in coming up with fixes that work for their populations.
"While living in Fargo may be attractive to some people, maybe living in Watford City's attractive to others," Spencer acknowledged. "This grant program allows those regional communities to figure out their own solutions and tackle those with the support of the state."
The application period began this week and runs through Jan. 21. There are grant caps for certain categories. For example, a local coalition focused on recruiting talent can receive a grant of up to $250,000. The cap is higher for infrastructure needs related to worker recruitment, such as child care centers.
get more stories like this via email