Advocates for children in New Hampshire said the state needs elected officials who will put kids' futures first.

With biennial budget negotiations to begin next year, they said access to quality early education, school meals and services are all on the line this election.

Megan Brabec, New Hampshire state manager for the Save the Children Action Network, said children cannot vote but they are on the ballot.

"It's really important that we have Senators and representatives that are aware of these issues," Brabec stressed. "That are prioritizing these issues and recognize the role for government in addressing these issues."

Brabec pointed out with child care for two children younger than five now topping $30,000 a year, too many children are forced to go without the early education known to improve their long-term outcomes.

A bipartisan mix of candidates is offering solutions, including the establishment of universal Pre-K to ensure all kids start kindergarten on the same footing. Others want to simplify eligibility for free or reduced-price meals using Medicaid data or create a state fund to finance early educator recruitment and retention.

Ella Bender, a child advocate and student at the University of New Hampshire, has been registering voters and encouraging them to think of future generations.

"We want students to know that the power is in their hands to vote for officials in the state of New Hampshire that are going to put children's needs first," Bender emphasized.

Bender argued every child in New Hampshire deserves a quality education and to have their basic needs met.

A recent survey found a majority of New Hampshire voters feel more favorable about a political candidate who supports greater investments in both child care and programs to relieve food insecurity.

A federal pilot program distributing diapers to Massachusetts families in need is expanding.

The program has already distributed more than two million diapers, along with wipes and other supplies, to roughly 2,500 children over the past year.

Melissa White, director of programs for the Valley Opportunity Council in Hampden County, said the program is especially helpful for newly homeless and migrant families.

"It's one less thing you have to think of with all the stressors of, 'I don't even know where I am, so I don't know where to get the diapers, or how to get there, or how I'm going to afford all those things,'" White explained.

White is thrilled federal funds will support the diaper program for another year. More than one-third of Massachusetts families said they cannot afford enough diapers for their children.

Community action agencies distributing the diapers said they are operating at capacity with growing waitlists. Many parents said they cannot leave their infants at child care without providing diapers.

Lisa Smith, executive director of Neighbors in Need in Lawrence, said she has seen the stress it causes for the hundreds of families they serve.

"There is a direct economic correlation that families need diapers so they can go to work, utilize day care," Smith pointed out. "There are so many social and emotional reasons to why this program is important."

Smith noted the diapers help families stretch their dollars a bit further to help meet their basic needs. WIC and SNAP funds cannot be used for diaper purchases.

Advocates hope to make the diaper program permanent in Massachusetts.

Joe Diamond, executive director of the Massachusetts Association for Community Action, a coalition of more than twenty community action agencies, said proposed legislation would create a state diaper fund to improve families' financial security and well-being.

"Our goal is to help people address their fundamental needs," Diamond emphasized. "So they can focus on the kind of training and education that's necessary to continue to get employment or better employment."

Diamond added the association is working with Children's Health Watch in Boston to gather data on the diaper program's effects. Studies show a lack of diapers for their babies as the number one predictor of postpartum depression in new mothers.

A new report re-examines how to measure Connecticut's poverty rates. Some findings show Supplemental Poverty Measure-based rates rose more than 12% in 2022 from nearly 8.5% in 2021.

Child poverty rates grew from 2021 to 2022, though this stems from pandemic relief payments being made available.

Patrick O'Brien, research and policy director with Connecticut Voices for Children, said new data examines how certain benefits impact poverty rates.

"So, in Connecticut in 2022, we saw that the public benefits that lifted the most people out of poverty were Social Security, food assistance programs, and housing subsidies. And we saw that the largest contributors to poverty were medical expenses, federal payroll taxes, and work expenses, he explained.

A state-level Child Tax Credit is one recommendation to improve the state's child poverty rates. It can provide a cash benefit to the poorest families in the state and help offset expenses contributing to high poverty rates. One concern is where the money to finance this credit would come from.

O'Brien added the state can decrease its tax gap, eliminate certain tax expenditures like the film industry tax credit, and increase taxes on higher-earning residents.

But these measures aren't entirely accurate. While the official poverty measure is based on cash income, the Supplemental Poverty Measure has a more accurate threshold of whether a family is in poverty. O'Brien said one interesting thing about the breakdowns of the data is how certain programs interact with poverty rates.

"The federal payroll taxes that are funding Social Security have this dynamic where Social Security is lifting primarily seniors out of poverty in part at the expense of pushing working adults into poverty," he said.

Some 218,000 Connecticut residents were lifted out of poverty by Social Security, though 39,000 were put into poverty by federal payroll taxes. But enacting a state Child Tax Credit would support over 1.3 million people statewide, including close to 207,000 kids living in or near poverty.

Washington voters are deciding on the fate of the state's capital gains tax this election. The tax supports child care and schools.

If passed, Initiative 2109 would repeal a 7% tax on capital gains for assets worth more than $250,000. Supporters of the repeal said capital gains taxes are volatile and it could lead to an income tax down the road.

Wesley Tharpe, senior adviser for state tax policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, noted 42 states have capital gains or income taxes and capital gains taxes are one of the most effective tools to balance out tax codes.

"Things like personal income taxes, corporate income taxes, capital gains taxes, those are going to collect a bit more from those at the top," Tharpe explained. "That helps balance out the fact that lower- and middle-income people are contributing a much larger share in things like sale taxes and fees - and to some degree, property taxes as well."

Last year, Washington state's capital gains tax pulled in about $786 million. The first $500 million collected from it goes toward schools, early learning and child care. Money collected beyond it is used for school construction. Washington has historically had one of the most regressive tax systems in the country.

Suzette Espinoza-Cruz, a Washington state lead volunteer for the Save the Children Action Network, said early childhood learning has benefited her niece's child, who was ready on his first day of kindergarten because of the state's Early Childhood Education and Assistance Program. Her niece's other child needed help in school and Espinoza-Cruz emphasized she was able to get help.

"What worries me about Ballot Initiative 2109 is that programs that are supplementing students' learning could be cut if we have less funding available for our pre-K through 12 system," Espinoza-Cruz stressed.

Tharpe pointed out there would be long-term effects from repealing the capital gains tax from investing less in quality education, early learning and child care.

"You're going to wind up down the road with a less competitive workforce, communities that are not as attractive of places to live and work," Tharpe projected. "There really is some significant economic risk to taking away that source of revenue for those public priorities."