This week, local election officials around Wisconsin will hold public stress testing of voting machines.

It's a longstanding practice under state law, but administrators say it might resonate more in today's political environment.

According to the Wisconsin Elections Commission, all municipalities must conduct a public test of their electronic voting equipment within ten days of each election.

Algoma City Clerk Erin Mueller said they're holding their viewing Tuesday morning this week. She described it as a pretty detailed run-through.

"We will take the voting machine out of the vault," said Mueller, "and we will go through the whole process of putting the cartridges in the places where they're supposed to go, adding the safety seals, recording the safety seals, and then putting the test ballots in the machine to ensure accuracy."

In a recent Gallup poll, 57% of Americans say they're confident votes for president this year will be accurately counted.

However, partisan gaps have widened, with faith in accuracy waning among Republican respondents.

In a battleground state like Wisconsin, Mueller said these tests are important, so administrators can show how consistent they are in overseeing elections.

Between work, family needs, and daily tasks, it might be hard for many Wisconsinites to attend a public testing.

Mueller said curious residents also are invited to watch the process unfold on election night as observers. As for the pre-election tests, she said they're a good training opportunity, too.

"I have my poll workers put a blank ballot through so they can see what happens, you know, with the machine," said Mueller. "I have them put a ballot that, somebody maybe happened to overvote in a certain selection, so they can see how the machine is going to react to that."

If something abnormal pops up during testing, state law requires local clerks to remedy the situation before voters can use that machine on Election Day.

Administrators around the country have said they're relying on aging voting equipment, with calls to boost federal funding for that type of infrastructure.

Mueller said her team is lucky because their machines were recently upgraded.

Support for this reporting was provided by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.




get more stories like this via email

Today's virtual "Ask Me Anything" program will address debunking immigration myths and tackle complex questions.

About one in 14 Pennsylvanians is an immigrant.

Cathryn Miller-Wilson, executive director of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS) Pennsylvania, said immigration has been one of the most prominent issues throughout the current election cycle.

The virtual forum will feature Wharton Professor Exequiel Hernandez, author of "The Truth About Immigration," whose book uses data to show immigrants' positive economic and social impacts.

"For every person that is deported, there are nine Americans who are economically hurt by that," said Miller-Wilson. "Even if the person who is deported is undocumented, immigrants are by far the largest group of entrepreneurs, so they start businesses that employ other Americans."

The online event is from 8- 9 p.m. Eastern time.

Miller-Wilson said Hernandez is a Uruguayan immigrant and has conducted decades of research linking immigration to investment and economic growth.

She added that this program aims to set the record straight so voters can make informed decisions at the polls.

Miller-Wilson noted that deporting immigrants would not only disrupt local businesses, but also separate many children who are U.S. citizens from their parents.

She said it could also impact the ability of these communities to participate fully in the democratic process.

"Many of them have fled regimes where they didn't have a right to vote," said Miller-Wilson. "So, when they are naturalized, they are much more likely than Native-born American citizens to vote. And that is critically important to saving our democracies, ensuring that people vote."

Miller-Wilson said her group helps people with incomes of less than 300% of the Federal Poverty Level with legal and social service needs.

Through immigration legal assistance and a wide range of services, HIAS Pennsylvania strives to protect rights and advocate for fair inclusion in American society.

Support for this reporting was provided by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.




get more stories like this via email

By Julia Tilton for The Daily Yonder.
Broadcast version by Chrystal Blair for Missouri News Service for the Public News Service/Daily Yonder Collaboration

With the 2024 presidential election less than three weeks away, Democrats and Republicans in rural areas are directing their focus beyond the top of the ticket and toward state and local-level offices. So-called “down-ballot” races feature candidates for state legislature, city council, local school boards, and even judges and police commissioners. These elected officials make decisions on issues in their community like education, housing services, public transportation, and healthcare. 

Thus far in 2024, 75% of these down-ballot elections were uncontested nationwide, meaning a candidate ran for office without opposition. This trend is common in rural America’s red districts, according to Contest Every Race, a group that tracks races where Democrats do not put up a nominee. The group said one reason Republicans run unopposed in red districts is because Democrats have historically felt their odds are so slim it’s simply not worth it to campaign.

However, this year’s presidential election has directed fresh attention to districts where down-ballot candidates have historically run unopposed.

Lauren Gepford, vice president and executive director of Contest Every Race, said down-ballot races are important for Democrats this year given how disengaged many voters are with politics.

“Politics isn’t just about whatever’s on CNN or Fox News or MSNBC, but it really is about the policies that affect your local life,” Gepford said. Contest Every Race told the Daily Yonder they are funding grassroots organizing partners in 292 rural counties this year as part of their rural grants program for Democrats to contest races in rural communities where Republicans would otherwise run unopposed.

Bill Greener is a Republican strategist based in North Carolina. In an interview with the Daily Yonder, he said this is an election where every vote – from rural to urban – matters. 

“This is an election of ‘leave no vote behind,’” Greener said. 

Looking at the top of the ticket, two vice presidential candidates claiming rural roots means both Democrats and Republicans are overtly vying for rural voters’ support in November. But for both parties, the strategy goes beyond campaigning for the White House. 

At the state level, the Republican State Leadership Committee (RSLC) has invested over $22 million across 21 states as of September 2024. Total investments from the RSLC top $34 million for the election cycle, and include distributions in swing states like Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. 

The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee (DLCC), the RSLC’s counterpart, told the Daily Yonder they have made $10 million in state-level investments this year. The investments have gone to the DLCC’s target states, which include (but aren’t exclusive to) swing states like Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania. This comes after Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign announced it would transfer an additional $2.5 million to the DLCC as part of its strategy to support down-ballot candidates. 

For Republicans, Greener said these investments are aimed at earning more votes in rural areas. 

“Our money goes there – to rural areas – to drive up the margin,” Greener said.

The story in rural areas is more complicated for Democrats. Rural organizers in places like Missouri, said that funding for down-ballot races historically has not come from the national Democratic party.

Jessica Piper ran for state representative as a Democrat in Nottoway County, Missouri, in 2022. She lost after receiving 25% of the vote. Then she joined Blue Missouri, an organization that provides crowdfunding for under-funded Democratic nominees in some of the reddest and most rural districts in the state. These districts, according to Piper, have often been neglected by investment from the national Democratic party. This creates a self-fulfilling prophecy, she said.

“Don’t give us any money, don’t invest in us, and look what happens,” Piper said.

Democrats Build a Bench in Rural Areas

The strategy in Missouri is changing this year, Piper said. Money – to the tune of $100,000 – has come in from the Democratic National Committee. 

“It's going to take a while before we see the fruits of our labor,” Piper said. “We know it's a long game, but we know it's worth playing.” 

Other Democratic rural organizers hold a similar sentiment to Piper’s, regardless of whether they have also received national party funding this year.

In upstate New York, Paolo Cremidis runs the Outrun Coalition, a grassroots group of 523 local Democratic elected officials from across rural America. Cremidis, the coalition’s executive director, said each official also brings a diverse identity not often represented in politics, including women, immigrants, young people, Latinos, Indigenous people, people of color, and members of the LGBTQ+ community. 

“We need to delve into this diversity, because if we don’t, we are not going to have a candidate base or bench going into the future,” Cremidis said. Much like building a team of players, Cremidis and other rural organizers are looking to field a group of candidates they can train and then tap to run in future races. 

Building a bench of Democratic candidates in rural areas is a part of what Piper called a “long game” for Democrats. Gepford said Contest Every Race has similar goals with its recruitment efforts, which focus on races at the local and state level. 

Republicans Look Beyond Rural

As Republicans outspend Democrats on down-ballot races by more than 2 to 1, they are looking beyond rural America to pick up voters.

This is part of the national strategy, said Nicholas Jacobs, a professor of political science at Colby College and author of The Rural Voter: The Politics of Place and the Disuniting of America. 

Jacobs said former President Donald Trump needs to win in more districts than he did in 2020 in order to win the presidency. For the Republican candidate, Jacobs said there are more votes to be won in the suburbs.

“Even if you start to lose a little bit in rural areas, if you can pick up in suburban areas, then you do just that,” Jacobs said. 

Greener said turnout can actually be a challenge for Republicans in rural areas.

“There are a whole lot of people that don’t turn out and vote in rural America,” Greener said. For elected offices down the ballot, community turnout decides the fate of local candidates.

Additionally, Jacobs said local candidates are not immune to the hyper-polarization and partisanship happening on the national scale this election cycle

“It is becoming harder and harder for candidates running down-ballot to escape the nationalized images of the party,” Jacobs said. 

Some Democrats, though, have maintained a degree of separation. Gepford said this is the “reverse coattails” effect. 

“Our [Democratic] candidates down-ballot will outperform the presidential [race], because they’re more likable in the area than the presidential candidate is,” Gepford said. Contest Every Race is focused on identifying reverse coattails in rural counties, and particularly in swing states, this year.

That is, if rural Americans vote. Even as vice presidential candidates JD Vance and Tim Walz bring up their connections to small-town America while on the campaign trail – the word “rural” was used multiple times during the vice presidential debate, after no mention at all during the presidential debate – rural strategists and organizers from both parties said it remains to be seen how community members will cast their support this year, if at all. 

In some rural areas, Jacobs said local candidates could push people to cast ballots more than anything else. 

“Sometimes local candidates’ ground games, especially for state legislative office, do actually have an important bearing on who turns out, so it’ll be interesting to see,” Jacobs said.


Julia Tilton wrote this article for The Daily Yonder.

A new AARP Nevada poll showed former President Donald Trump holds a seven-point lead over Vice-President Kamala Harris among voters 50+ in the Silver State.

Maria Moore, state director of AARP Nevada, said a strong majority of Nevadans age 50 and older said they are extremely motivated to cast a ballot. Among older Hispanics and Latino voters, 84% said their motivation to vote is 10 out of 10.

"In the 2018 midterm elections, the 50+ made up 60% of the electorate in our state," Moore reported. "They're poised to make an even larger share this year."

And while Trump holds a lead over Harris with voters 50+, Harris holds a 15-point lead among older Hispanic and Latino voters. Moore said if candidates want to win in the Silver State, they'll need to focus on addressing the issues that matter to older voters, like protecting Social Security, supporting family caregivers and aim to bring down the costs of necessities such as food, housing and utility bills.

In the Senate race, Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., holds a lead over her Republican opponent Sam Brown among voters overall, but holds a 20-point lead with older Hispanic and Latino voters.

Almost 30% of the Silver State's population identifies as Hispanic or Latino, according to the U.S. Census.

Bob Ward, partner in the polling firm FabrizioWard, said Democratic support among Hispanic and Latino voters is changing.

"More Hispanic voters opting for Republican candidates, even though overall they're still certainly a Democratic-leaning constituency in the state," Ward explained.

The polling data found immigration and border security are the most important issues for Hispanic 50+ voters, followed by inflation and threats to democracy.