Despite their growing popularity, consumers in New York and nationwide still face misconceptions about electric vehicles.

One of the most pervasive is about colder climates reducing battery efficiency, which many energy and environmental agencies have resoundingly found false.

Kate Kruk, president of the New York Capital District Electric Vehicle Association, said given the evolution of EVs since they first hit the road, people can benefit from EVs any time of year.

"Most modern EVs have such advanced battery management systems it kind of minimizes that impact," Kruk pointed out. "You can use features a lot of electric vehicles have called preconditioning, which can ready your car so the car is already warm when you're ready to go so it doesn't reduce that range as much."

From Kruk's own experience as a longtime EV driver and upstate New Yorker, she feels an EV is better equipped to tackle the region's snowy winters, because an EV's battery runs across the bottom of its chassis making for better weight distribution on slippery roads. With a gas-powered car, most of the weight is in the front with the engine which can make it harder to control on the snow and ice.

Aside from driving capabilities, EV's pose many cost, health and safety benefits for consumers. Though it has translated into increasing consideration to buy an EV, there is still some reluctance to purchase one.

Kruk argued the biggest challenge is in a driver's mind, given so many have only traveled in fossil-fuel-powered vehicles.

"Once we get over that general kind of anxiety, it can play out and hopefully we can start to be a little bit more open to different ideas," Kruk contended. "Something, again, only knowing or only coming from a background driving in a fossil fuel vehicle, range anxiety is very real and it becomes a challenge to get people over that hump."

The election could test the country's love of EVs. Former president Donald Trump claims Vice President Kamala Harris will implement an EV mandate to cripple the auto industry, though the claim is false. Kruk added no matter the election's outcome, there will not be much of a change in the country's adoption of EVs.

"The ship has sailed," Kruk emphasized. "I think we're ready to move forward especially knowing that the United States can be and should be a leader in e-mobility and technology."

Advocates of electric vehicles are countering what they call misleading claims about the effects of EV production in Michigan.

Critics of electric vehicles argued prioritizing EV production could harm traditional auto manufacturing jobs, and said the focus should be on safeguarding such roles and strengthening U.S. control within the auto industry.

David Kieve, president of EDF Action, the advocacy partner of the Environmental Defense Fund, said EV policies have already generated billions in investments and promise to create more high-paying jobs in Michigan.

"I think one of the things that we've been particularly focused on is the GM Lansing Grand River Plant," Kieve pointed out. "These aren't jobs that might come at some point in the future, these are current jobs that are here right now."

Opponents of the electric vehicle trend also warn more EV projects risk making the Great Lakes State reliant on foreign investments tied to China, raising economic and security issues.

Kieve emphasized Michigan, known for "putting the world on wheels," should not view EV production as a lost cause because China has a head start. He called that view "defeatist," among other things.

"It sells short Michigan autoworkers' ability to compete against the rest of the world, including against China," Kieve argued.

He also noted traditional vehicle pollution affects lower-income and minority communities the most, giving them the most to gain from EVs, in terms of cleaner air and reduced health and vehicle maintenance costs. Michigan has about 43,000 registered EVs on the road, fewer than the 60,000 originally projected by this time by state officials.

A national nonprofit dedicated to empowering Latino communities and improving access to public resources has launched a $10 million initiative to increase urban tree canopies in underserved areas across the United States, including the Sunshine State.

Hispanic Access has launched the Nuestros Bosques: Faith-Based and Strategic Local Investments program, which provides grants ranging from $50,000 to $1 million for projects to enhance environmental resilience, particularly in neighborhoods vulnerable to urban heat and pollution.

Amaris Alanis Ribeiro is director of forestry at Hispanic Access, and said the program is designed to empower communities with more than just greenery.

"I think our angle of calling it nuestros bosque signifies that it's about a reciprocal relationship with our forest," said Ribeiro. "This is our environment, and having that long-term relationship with the environment is key."

The Nuestros Bosques program, in partnership with the U.S. Forest Service, encourages faith-based organizations, Indigenous groups and local nonprofits to apply.

Its 80% funding focus is on disadvantaged communities. Applications are open until November 15, and interested organizations can apply through the Hispanic Access Foundation's website.

Ribeiro said the initiative highlights the role of faith-based organizations and Indigenous groups, among the key eligible applicants, in fostering a community-based approach to environmental care.

"The way our communities, especially Black and brown communities, connect with the environment," said Ribeiro, "with our ancestral knowledge, our indigenous knowledge, has been through a spiritual and cultural way."

Funding will be allocated to projects focusing on urban tree planting and maintenance, planning, and community engagement around forestry.

In Miami Beach, city officials plan to use the funds to expand native tree coverage along the Beachwalk path, which spans Miami's east coast, to mitigate urban heat and flooding risks.

The City of Hollywood plans to use the funds to plant nearly 500 trees in disadvantaged neighborhoods - including species such as the southern oak, royal poinciana and Sabal palms.




get more stories like this via email

Washingtonians are voting on a measure that will decide the future of the state's climate law. Opponents of the initiative say it could hurt the state's fight against increasingly severe wildfires.

Initiative 2117 would repeal Washington's cap-and-trade law, known as the Climate Commitment Act, which invests in climate resiliency programs with funds from the state's largest carbon emitters.

Amanda Monthei, a former wildland firefighter in the state, said a "yes" vote on the initiative repealing the Climate Commitment Act would damage efforts to protect against wildfires.

"We're going to be potentially losing that $30 million in funding that's supporting things like prescribed fire, which helps reduce flammable vegetation," she said, "as well as manual treatments or mechanical treatments like using a chainsaw to cut extra vegetation or any number of other things."

The Climate Commitment Act has raised more than $2 billion since it went into effect last year. Opponents of the law, who are supporting initiative 2117, have called it a "hidden gas tax" for consumers and question where money raised from the law has gone.

Jay Wilkins, an active firefighter and member of the Washington State Council of Firefighters, said repealing the state's climate law would be shortsighted and make his job harder. Wilkins said one of the biggest benefits from Climate Commitment Act funds has been the prevention piece, such as grants that help homeowners harden their homes against wildfires.

"What that does for us in the response part is gives us a fighting chance to save homes. It gives us a fighting chance to limit fire spread," he said. "And really at the end of the day, shorter-duration fires means less air pollution, less smoke in the air. It makes everybody's quality of life better."

Monthei said there's an urgency to funding wildfire resiliency right now as the effects from climate change worsen.

"We really just need all hands on deck. We need all the resources we can get. We need all the funding we can get," she said. "And this can be a sustainable and really effective funding stream for building forest health and resilience and building more fire-resilient landscapes in Washington if we allow it to be."


get more stories like this via email