By Jabari Gibbs for The Current.
Broadcast version by Shanteya Hudson for Georgia News Connection reporting for the Rural News Network-Public News Service Collaboration

Republicans and Democrats used the final weekend of early voting to urge Glynn County residents to cast ballots in what is expected to be a razor-tight race for Georgia’s sixteen electoral votes for president.

In 2016, Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton by almost 29% of the vote in Glynn and four years later beat Joe Biden by 23% of the nearly 42,000 votes cast in the county. The former president is expected to prevail again this year in this heavily Republican county. 

But statewide, the race between the former president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris could be decided by the narrowest of margins. That’s why in even as red a county as Glynn, both campaigns are scrambling for votes. 

On Saturday morning, the First African Baptist Church, just off Amherst Street in Brunswick, hosted a “Souls to the Polls” rally, offering hot dogs, hamburgers and encouragement to prospective voters before they boarded a bus for the short ride to the nearby county board of elections office. 

“I’m not going to tell you who to vote for, but you know what has to be done,” Regina H. Johnson, a retired Glynn County school teacher, told the mostly pro-Kamala Harris crowd.

Johnson, who helped organize the event, explained the amendments on the ballot, including a proposed Educational Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax (ESPLOST) of 1%. “That’s one cent on every dollar spent here in Glynn County…and that goes for anybody who visits,” she said.

For Charlie Middlebrooks, in particular, Saturday was a landmark day.

The 19-year-old recent graduate of Brunswick High was aboard the first shuttle leaving the church and cast his first vote. He was driven, he said, to ensure Trump would not return to the White House.

“The whole thing about how he’s a millionaire — he was born with the money and Kamala Harris had to work her way up. And that relates to a lot of us here, including myself, because we didn’t start out with all that money. Growing up, you got to work, work your way up. That’s the way I was taught. The way a real man does it,” Middlebrooks said. 

‘Slept her way to the top’

Keen to win over the undecided and uncommitted, especially in the county’s Black community, Republicans were busy over the weekend, too. 

A former reality court television judge, Joe Brown, was the featured speaker at a Sunday rally at Brunswick’s Selden Park. He appeared as part of a five-city tour of Georgia organized by MAGA Black Georgia that includes stops in Rome, Marietta, Savannah and Thomasville. 

Brown excoriated Harris, repeating baseless allegations and smears that Trump has often voiced during campaign rallies.

“Now I don’t know about you, but I’d much rather have a successful billionaire who’s manipulated all of that running the U.S. government as the chief administrative officer than somebody that has never done that in their lives, that has slept her way to the top,” he told the audience of about 45 people, eight of whom were Black. 

Brown suggested that Harris was physically unfit to serve as president, though her campaign released a doctor’s report earlier this month that she is in “excellent health” and “possesses the physical and mental resilience required to serve as president.” 

“Some doctor friends of mine tell me that her word salad thing is the result of something they call early onset dementia. It starts in the mid-50s, and maybe it might hit by the early 60s, but she’s 60 years old this month,” Brown said. “It is very alarming.”

Trump has released very little health information, including after his ear was grazed by a bullet during an assassination attempt in July in Pennsylvania.

Brown’s audience was made up almost entirely of White — and very vocal — Trump supporters. For some, however, their backing of the former president wasn’t unqualified.

“Do I find him disgusting at times? Yes, I do. I find his rhetoric to be disgusting at times. I find the name-calling to be disgusting at times,” Carolyn Fisher admitted. “‘[But] I like what he says he is going to do, and I’ve seen him do it between 2016 and 2021. I saw what he did, and I want that back again.”

But Brown’s talking points about uncontrolled immigration and voting by illegal migrants resonated deeply with the 74-year-old Fisher, a resident of St. Simons. 

“I’m afraid. I am terrified about the illegal migrants that are coming across our borders, about people who are not even citizens that are voting. I am terrified about it,” she said.

Gordon Rolle, the head of MAGA Black Georgia, vouched for Brown. 

“You know, there’s no difference between him and a college professor as far as the information he has to present, but he gets a lot of information from historical documents, but a lot of information that he gives, if you notice that comes from first-hand knowledge of this.”

A former Democrat, Rolle was approached by the Virgina-based MAGABlack to develop an outreach program for Georgia that would target Black males between the ages of 18 and 34.

But feeling that Trump was “the right choice” and frustrated that nonprofits like MAGABlack are barred by law from endorsing presidential candidates, Rolle divorced himself from MAGABlack and moved to MAGA Black Georgia.

“After the election, what we want to do is have an establishment in each community that we’ve been in contact with, and we invite other communities to reach out to us because we consider ourselves an umbrella organization,” he said.


This story was originally produced by Jabari Gibbs of The Current as part of the Rural News Network, an initiative of the Institute for Nonprofit News (INN), supporting more than 475 independent, nonprofit news organizations.


get more stories like this via email

Wisconsinites overwhelmingly voted 'yes' on a record number of school funding measures, according to a new Wisconsin Policy Forum study. The appeals essentially asked voters to increase their own property taxes to fund school operations across the state. Voters favored a record number 169 referendums, authorizing a record total of $4.4 billion in new funding for 145 school districts.

Denise Gaumer Hutchison, Northwest regional organizer with the Wisconsin Public Education Network, said districts are being forced to take their needs to the ballot box to fund gaps between prioritizing students and overdue bills.

"The first responsibility of our public schools across the state is to educate children and to take care of the kids and the families they serve, every single day," she said. "So, that means any available funds that public schools have they put toward educating children. And so, if that means a boiler has to be patched rather than replaced, that's what they're going to do."

Almost half of the state's 421 school districts passed a referendum in April or November. Hutchison blames the state for not adequately funding school priorities, from building maintenance, to student mental-health services. The state superintendent announced last week the proposed 2025-27 budget would include $4 billion more in spending for public schools.

Despite 78% of the ballot measures passing, Hutchson said the districts where voters turned them down are in dire need of support to keep their doors open. Regardless of whether taxpayers have children in public schools, she says, the focus should be on providing every Wisconsin student with a quality education.

"I want their experience in public schools to be as awesome as my 25 and 26-year-old's were. I want them to get to be able to participate in sports, in theater, in drama and DECA, and learn about the history of our state and our country, and think about what our state and our country can be," she continued.

The study found factors like inflation outpacing the state allocated per-student revenue limits, the loss of pandemic aid and staff competition in a tight labor market are all factors that contributed to the record number of referendums.


get more stories like this via email

The presidential vote was close in Nevada and with the results in, local organizations leaning more progressive believe the re-election of Donald Trump could put much of the progress made in the Silver State in jeopardy.

Shelbie Swartz, executive director of Battle Born Progress, said Nevadans should take Trump's campaign promises seriously. She called on leaders in Carson City and in Congress to "stand up for their constituents," whom she argued a Trump administration could target, from immigrants to people who identify as transgender.

"If your values change based on polling, if your willingness to fight for the dignity of all Nevadans does not extend to our transgender siblings, then those are not values," Swartz contended. "They're talking points drafted in pencil."

Swartz stressed she has faith in the Nevada Legislature to pass bills to uphold and protect the rights of Nevadans but added the biggest challenge will be seeing what can make it across Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo's desk. Last year, Lombardo, who endorsed Donald Trump, vetoed a record 75 bills passed by the Legislature's Democratic majority.

Trump campaigned on the idea of mass deportations and has doubled down on the threat since his win.

Leo Murrieta, executive director of the group Make the Road Action Nevada, said it is time for leaders who are ready to move beyond what he calls "fear-based policies," to advocate instead for immigration reform, including clearer, earned pathways to citizenship.

"It is time for leaders to see our community as an integral part of this country's fabric, not just a political talking point," Murrieta argued. "We are standing united with many other groups ready to resist any of the policies and any of the other threats that we're certainly going to face."

A new report from the American Immigration Council found a one-time mass deportation operation would cost the United States at least $315 billion to remove more than 13 million people.

California good governance experts are warning the expansion of presidential power under a second Trump administration could cast aside expertise and the public good to further purely political aims.

Over the past week, President-elect Donald Trump has nominated multiple candidates known more for their personal support for him than for relevant expertise.

Bill Resh, associate professor of public policy at the University of Southern California, said Trump appears to be following the blueprint set by Project 2025.

"Project 2025 puts into place principles such as loyalty, first and foremost, to the President as a criterion for placement into these agencies, and often with the intention of undermining those missions."

Supporters of President-elect Trump say voters have given him a mandate to govern as he sees fit. So far, he has nominated people strongly aligned with the oil industry to run the U.S. Interior Department and be Energy Secretary. He has nominated a climate change skeptic to run the Environmental Protection Agency, a television host with no executive experience as Defense Secretary, an election denier for Attorney General and a vaccine skeptic to run the Department of Health and Human Services.

Resh noted Trump has already suggested using recess appointments to avoid what could be bruising confirmation hearings for some of his nominees.

"His stars are aligned to consolidate executive power and bring what used to be either quasi- or fully independent agencies, that were not subject to political whims, to bring those agencies to heel toward his policy preferences," Resh contended.

This year, the U.S. Supreme Court found presidents cannot be prosecuted for most actions in office. And come January, both houses of Congress will be controlled by allies of President-elect Trump.