Conservative and traditionally "red" Utah is one of the states that helped elect former President Donald Trump last week but with Election Day behind us, there are rising concerns about the role political violence could play from now until Inauguration Day.

Robert Pape, professor of political science at the University of Chicago, said there has not been much activity, but warned it can change in an instant. He compared the country's polarized nature to prime wildfire conditions which do not require much to ignite.

"Folks like me can scientifically measure the size of the dry, combustible material that can be touched off," Pape explained. "But the triggers -- the lighting strikes, the cigar butts thrown out the window, camp fires left unattended -- the triggers are always unpredictable."

Pape pointed out just last week, U.S. federal investigators revealed another assassination attempt on Trump with ties to Iran. He commended President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris for advocating for peace and rejecting the inflammatory political rhetoric but added talks of a resistance march ahead of Inauguration Day in Washington D.C. have already started to take place and are sparking concerns.

The Trump campaign claimed it had nothing to do with racist texts sent to Black and Latino people across the nation following last week's election. Pape noted while they could be considered a form of political violence, they are not what he called "good triggers."

"We see a lot of material like that and it does ebb and flow," Pape observed. "But the kind of triggers that really matter here are like for example Donald Trump served as a key trigger multiple, multiple times before January 6th and then on January 6th itself."

The Federal Communications Commission's enforcement bureau is investigating the text messages and said in a statement "the message are unacceptable" and they "take this type of targeting very seriously."

Support for this reporting was provided by The Carnegie Corporation of New York.

This weekend, a new coalition called "We Are California" is holding meetings up and down the state, preparing to resist what it sees as anticipated attacks from the incoming Trump administration.

Hundreds of nonprofits have joined the coalition, whose mission is to promote inclusion, community and democratic norms.

Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, explained the purpose of the coalition.

"What are we bracing for? Exactly what Donald Trump said he was going to do: mass deportations, family separation, worksite raids," Salas explained. "These are all things that he has done in the past. But what we're expecting and what we're bracing for is a scale of attack on our community that is unprecedented."

The coalition hopes by banding together, its members can fight any erosion of civil rights for LGBTQ+ people, immigrants and others. The gatherings this weekend will take place online and in person in the Bay Area, Fresno, Los Angeles, Orange County and San Diego.

Salas pointed out California has also put limits on how new immigration detention centers can be built.

"We can also model what it means to resist, but what it means to defy," Salas emphasized. "Because I think last time, we resisted. This time around, it's really about putting in place everything that interrupts this agenda."

In 2017, lawmakers passed the California Values Act, which said no state or local resources can be used to assist federal immigration enforcement and declares schools, hospitals and courthouses as safe spaces. And the California Trust Act said jails should not hold people with low-level nonviolent offenses past their initial detention period solely to give the feds time to initiate deportation proceedings.


get more stories like this via email

Ohio Republicans will soon have stronger representation in Washington, D.C., as Buckeye State native and Vice President-Elect J.D. Vance is set to take office in January.

Across the country and here in Ohio, a majority of voters cast their ballots to elect Donald Trump as the 47th president, with Vance as his running mate.

Amy Hagan, a resident of Vance's hometown of Middletown, said she voted for him and is hopeful for what she called "a brighter future."

"I think it's really cool just to be able to get our name out there, you know, see what he's got," Hagan explained. "I just hope he stands up to his word. That's my biggest thing, is trust."

Improving the economy will be a major issue for many voters in Middletown, where the poverty rate is over 19%, more than 6.5% above the national rate. Women ages 35-44 make up the largest group of people in poverty in the city, followed by women ages 45-54.

Jo Baldwin, president of the college Democrats at Ohio State University, is among the almost 44% of Ohio voters who did not choose the Trump/Vance ticket, although she said she is still proud an Ohio State graduate is going to take office.

"I think that it's awesome that Ohio State was able to produce a vice president," Baldwin emphasized. "I think it's a great school and I'm very lucky to go here. But I do think that he is not representative of Ohio State's population."

Vance's campaign stump had its share of rocky patches, as his candor resulted in some statements infuriating women, teachers and cat lovers, to name a few. But with more than 3 million votes cast for the Trump/Vance ticket, Ohio's 17 electoral votes are officially secured for the new administration.


get more stories like this via email

A proposition on the ballot to change the way voting works in Idaho failed in last week's election.

Proposition One would have opened up primaries to create a top-four system and ranked-choice voting in general elections. The measure received 30% approval.

Al Vanderklipp - senior research associate with the Northwest-based think tank Sightline Institute - said even when people dislike the status quo for elections, they are suspicious of proposals to change the way they vote.

"The default stance of most voters is 'no' for these ballot measures," said Vanderklipp, "and so there's a really high bar to educate voters on the potential benefit of why they might want to vote 'yes,' and in this case it appears that bar was not cleared."

Many top Republicans came out in opposition to the measure.

Like many states across the country, state Republicans saw success on Election Day, adding three more seats in the state Legislature to the supermajority they already possessed.

A ranked-choice measure in Oregon also failed.

However, Vanderklipp noted that candidates could win without receiving a majority of the votes.

"Let's say the independent candidate wins 33% of the vote, and the Republican wins 33% of the vote, and the Democrat wins 34%," said Vanderklipp. "That would elect a Democrat in a state that really doesn't elect Democratic candidates - and that would not be representative, probably, of the population as a whole."

Vanderklipp noted that a ranked-choice system could solve this by counting people's second choice in elections.

But with an unpopular result for Proposition One, he said other changes could be possible in the future.

"There are more incremental reforms like top-two primaries, rather than top four," said Vanderklipp. "California and Washington use those. They're pretty popular. They're effective in electing more moderate and more representative candidates."

Support for this reporting was provided by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.




get more stories like this via email